| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Callistus
Gallente Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 02:13:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Dark Shikari Edited by: Dark Shikari on 23/01/2007 01:55:45
Its better because it purposely degrades all audio and blurs all video unless you have a license and play it on a monitor that supports HDMI (read: 2000 dollars). Its better because it performs quite a bit slower in all benchmarks and eats an extra 800 megabytes of RAM.
Eh? Have you actually tried Vista? Your posts are usually pretty intelligent but this one just seems misguided.
I've been running Vista RC2 since it came out and the ram usage is under 400MB (of my 1GB) when its relatively idle. I used to run 2GB, before one stick died, and then I remember the ram usage was higher (around 600MB iirc) so I can only assume that Vista's memory usage varies depending on how much ram you have to spare.
As for the degraded audio and blurred video I simply have no idea what you're talking about. --------------
[Coreli Corporation Mainfrane] |

Callistus
Gallente Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 02:30:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Dark Shikari Edited by: Dark Shikari on 23/01/2007 02:13:58
Originally by: Callistus
Eh? Have you actually tried Vista? Your posts are usually pretty intelligent but this one just seems misguided.
I've been running Vista RC2 since it came out and the ram usage is under 400MB (of my 1GB) when its relatively idle. I used to run 2GB, before one stick died, and then I remember the ram usage was higher (around 600MB iirc) so I can only assume that Vista's memory usage varies depending on how much ram you have to spare.
Under 400MB? I haven't installed it simply because I only have a gig, but the screenshots I've seen show 800MB idle usage. I know someone with a gig who couldn't play back a DVD because he didn't have enough free memory.
Well I'm sat here with 45 running process (AV, firefox, download software, etc) and the memory usage is 450MB. I also regularly run two eve clients and ventrillo on top of that and don't run into problems. Admittedly I did try and play music on top of that a few times and things did slow down.
Originally by: Dark Shikari
Originally by: Callistus
As for the degraded audio and blurred video I simply have no idea what you're talking about.
Read up on Vista DRM. You cannot play back any protected content (meaning any DVD, even things you could play fine on XP) without it being blurred unless you have a screen that supports HDMI.
Not sure exactly what you mean by "blurred" but I've watched a ton of DVDs on this computer with no problems at all. Audio quality on all my music seems to be exactly the same as XP as well. --------------
[Coreli Corporation Mainfrane] |

Callistus
Gallente Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 02:41:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Callistus on 23/01/2007 02:38:03
Originally by: Dark Shikari The 800MB must have been counting pagefile usage. How much pagefile usage do you get with that 450MB of RAM?
Page file usage says 768M/2301M --------------
[Coreli Corporation Mainfrane] |

Callistus
Gallente Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 02:51:00 -
[4]
Actually that pagefile of 768 was while I was watching a movie (bumping the ram usage up to 525MB).
Now that I've stopped and the ram is back down to around 450MB, the pagefile is down to 660. --------------
[Coreli Corporation Mainfrane] |

Callistus
Gallente Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 10:37:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Callistus on 23/01/2007 10:36:36
Originally by: jitachecker
Originally by: Callistus
As for the degraded audio and blurred video I simply have no idea what you're talking about.
linkeh
Hmmm does sound scary... but:
Quote: Microsoft said only the quality of "premium content" would be lowered, and only if requested by copyright holders
Guess we'll have to wait and see how many copyright holders actually take advantage of this.
Also,
Quote: Microsoft said that if picture quality was degraded it would still be better than current DVD quality.
--------------
[Coreli Corporation Mainfrane] |
| |
|