7helix3
Perkone
Caldari State
0
   |
Posted - 2016.03.08 10:07:52 -
[1] - Quote
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:
One of the dumbest mechanics in eve is that you can conduct aggressive acts outside a station and the station prevents you from docking, BUT if you just don't do anything aggressive for a minute the docking manager suddenly forgets what just happened. You should have to leave grid, kill or drive off all agressors to regain docking rights.
We need commitment from both sides of engagements. Basically if you've aggressed and you're still being shot at,pointed or webbed - no docking.
I need to dock when local spikes and more WT enter system. It'd be too easy to get someone aggressed, and on top of the usual HS neutral logi fagotry now we'd have to deal with you escalating the conflict whilst preventing me from de-aggressing? No. If you don't want your target to dock up, get a good bump on him or grab one of those nifty microjumpfield generators.
I think you're proving her point. You need to commit to the fight, you don't need an easy game provided escape mechanic. If local spikes after you engage, then you should lose your ship for not providing yourself with good intel.
It's worrisome that you don't even see that it's your particular brand of risk aversion (The game owes me an escape route after I engage) is a poison that weakens the game.
"I need to dock when local spikes and more WT enter system." No you don't need to. You personally feel too afraid to commit to an engagement because something might happen, and *gasp* you will lose your ship. It's just a ship cupcake, if you feel you need a way out after you engage, then maybe missioning in Motsu is more your playstyle. Please don't try to pass your fears of losing a ship as a legitimate NEED. It's just not so.
You then go on to prove your lack of game prowess with "If you don't want your target to dock up, get a good bump on him or grab one of those nifty microjumpfield generators" Do you even know that docking rings (say Jita for example) are sometimes over 30km in diameter. A GOOD BUMP? You can't bump anything in eve for 30km with A GOOD BUMP. Then you double down with mentioning the microjumpfield generators which for good reason don't function in HS and due to risk averse whinage won't function in LS either.
"It'd be too easy to get someone aggressed, and on top of the usual HS neutral logi fagotry now we'd have to deal with you escalating the conflict whilst preventing me from de-aggressing?" Ummm..... what??? You're basically saying that it's too easy to kill someone and logi faggotry as your reason to need the deagressing and docking mechanics.
WTF? Who's really the risk averse player? The guy that brings more players and sure why not some logi OR IS IT the guy crying they NEEEEEED deagressing and docking mechanics so they won't 'lose'? I would call the first group a team of players who plan ahead and play to win. I would call the second (this would be you) a risk averse pvp poser crying for CCP to maintain easy escape mechanics.
TL/DR - you sicken me.
Lost can't log in right now (vacationing in Ireland), so as an alt of Lost I'm picking up her slack.
|