|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
6437
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 16:06:15 -
[1] - Quote
We are excited to give you an update about Project Discovery, the real life Human Protein Research project in EVE Online.
Project Discovery is waiting for you on the test server Singularity and we invite you to start testing this feature!
Please read more about this great initiative in CCP Scarpia's dev blog Project Discovery needs You! and provide plenty of feedback.
CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer - Volunteer Manager
|
|
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
6437
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 16:13:51 -
[2] - Quote
Mr Grape Drink wrote:The comments link on the dev blog itself leads to the skill trade dev blog comments post Oh dang! Thanks for the notification, I have updated the link.
CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer - Volunteer Manager
|
|
|
CCP Paradox
1434
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 16:33:02 -
[3] - Quote
Makoto Priano wrote:Hey there!
I'm on Singularity now. How do I try out Discovery? :)
We're just getting it set up, and should not take more than an hour. I will reply again here when it is up.
CCP Paradox | EVE QA | Team Astro Sparkle
Always bet on the Drifters.
|
|
|
CCP RedDawn
C C P C C P Alliance
747
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 16:48:45 -
[4] - Quote
Ned Thomas wrote:So over time will there be multiple research projects associated with this or will always be completely focused on one research goal at a time (if the research goal ever changes at all, of course)?
This project is set for the Human Protein Atlas for now, but hopefully you can see the other possibilities in the future for other types of research. They would still have to fit thematically within the EVE experience however.
Team Space Glitter
|
|
|
CCP RedDawn
C C P C C P Alliance
747
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 16:55:22 -
[5] - Quote
Midori Tsu wrote:What are the rewards going to be like? is it a baseline of say 500 lp that increases with the rating?
Currently, the amount of LP you gain is in direct correlation with your Accuracy Rating, with 500 SOE LP being the payout for a 100% score on a single sample. So a 1% score will grant you 5 LP.
Please be aware however that these values and the overall rewards are not finalised and are subject to change before they appear on TQ. (Based on your feedback and our own observations during public testing of course)
Team Space Glitter
|
|
|
CCP Paradox
1435
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 18:18:04 -
[6] - Quote
Project Discovery is now active on Singularity, thank you for your support. In the name of Science, please give it a try!
CCP Paradox | EVE QA | Team Astro Sparkle
Always bet on the Drifters.
|
|
|
CCP Paradox
1436
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 19:11:45 -
[7] - Quote
Makoto Priano wrote: Is there some allowance for, say, 'common misidentifications,' as in this case? Or do I just need to work on my pattern recognition?
Remember there is a color channel selector at the bottom of the sample image. Changing the channels can help you identify the correct characteristics sometimes if you are having difficulty.
CCP Paradox | EVE QA | Team Astro Sparkle
Always bet on the Drifters.
|
|
|
CCP Paradox
1437
|
Posted - 2016.01.22 19:32:29 -
[8] - Quote
Sarmatiko wrote:It's easy enough...once you figured it out. But I already failed twice with the Nucleus\Nucleoplasm recognition: http://i.imgur.com/2ZU2Mmr.jpg As you can see Nucleus wasn't correct "answer" despite description ("overlaps with blue marker and evenly stained") and correct was Nucleoplasm (green should color everything, except small circles, which is not the case on this image).
In that example, it is only the nucleus, as soon as you see the green outside the nucleus also it is something else. Remember to use the color channels to see, especially for times there are green inside and out of the nucleus.
CCP Paradox | EVE QA | Team Astro Sparkle
Always bet on the Drifters.
|
|
|
HPA Darkfield Oramara
Polaris Corporation
6
|
Posted - 2016.03.11 09:34:24 -
[9] - Quote
Zepheros Naeonis wrote:Kata Amentis wrote:It's quite interesting, but some of the "correct" results don't make sense from either a description or sample image stand point. For example Bafflededit: More BaffledCould someone explain how that is the right answer? asymmetrical bloby/tubular compared to the "correct" symmetrical vainy/web. Is that "correct" in the sense that an above average number of people on sisi clicked on it, so we're being penalised because people are just clicking through carelessly? a bug? naff data in the project? etc. edit: couple of samples later, I get something almost the same as before "ok, it was this last time..." wrong.... erm I am getting this more times than I can count and it is beginning to **** me off. I'm going to take the suggestion someone else mentioned and close/reopen after every submission to see if that helps. EDIT: http://i.imgtc.com/LDtorSg8cF.png Don't mind my answer, I should have just skipped it honestly. 100% selected Cytoplasm when it clearly states that it is "seen throughout the entire cell EXCEPT FOR THE NUCLEUS (blue part)". The Nucleus is completely riddled with the cytoplasm, so how is Cytoplasm even an option in this case? I am either completely lost in my understanding of how picking between the groups works or this is just a spam fest of amazing proportions. http://i.imgtc.com/8NYTqicNoS.png HOLY FACEPALM Community consensus needs to be scrubbed asap. I'm sorry to say, but there should be someone at least reviewing a sample after a certain number of submissions to determine whether they are on the right track or not. They are going to receive so many flawed results it isn't even funny.
As one of the researchers for this project I would say that your first image looks like a plasma membrane staining, together with nucleoli (and maybe also an additional cytoplasmic and nuclear staining, hard to tell when not being able to toggle the different channels). The point is however that there's very common that the protein is located to two organelles or more, which means that a cell with both cytoplasmic and nuclear staining will have staining in both the area overlapping with the red and the blue marker. The descriptions of the different locations are only true if there would be a cytoplasmic staining only. This is a bit tricky of course, but usually the different stainings don't have the exact same intensity which might make it possible to differentiate them.
I agree that the second image would rather be labeled as vesicles, but I can't really tell what the consensus for that location is from the image.
And what we have seen from the result from the test server is that you guys actually are doing really good!
|
|
|
|
|