| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 18:42:15 -
[1] - Quote
Pandora Bokks wrote:
Please ban Windows 10, hovering over the icon shows a preview of all open clients (it is small but I have bird eyes).
Visual Acuity is now a bannable offense. |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 19:11:52 -
[2] - Quote
Tiberizzle wrote: I also think when you start placing restrictions on presentation and input mapping beyond multicasting (or multicasting "workarounds" like rollover bars) you're starting to roll down a slippery slope at the bottom of which lies pretty much banning people for being too good.
Being better at the game than me is unfair. You are using the game client in a way that gives you an unfair advantage over me. Enjoy your ban.
|

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 19:20:59 -
[3] - Quote
lord xavier wrote:You're allies bested my alt by having 10 people ready for me. This was an unfair advantage of 1v10. Enjoy your ban.
But anyone could get 9 friends, therefore it is totally fair since any player could just recruit 9 guys...
But wait! I don't have any friends because i'm an *******! Now it's unfair again!
BUT WAIT! I can now LEGALLY multi-box 9 more dudes in pvp since that makes it fair again.
Or something **** I dunno.
|

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 21:47:07 -
[4] - Quote
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
>Posts vague things that now are bannable.
>Posts vaguer timescale on when, if ever, clarification will be given.
This is a very uncool topic to let people guess on dudes...
Time to go multi-box shoot a monument in Jita.
|

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 23:15:21 -
[5] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:inb4 cloaks require CAPTCHA between x cycles
A Captcha would both:
1. Overlay on the EvE Client
2. Confer an unfair advantage to the person who is at their keyboard, who can type in the captcha. This would at the very least, double the cycle time for the non-afk player.
The CCP dev who implements this would be risking a ban. |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2016.02.24 17:39:30 -
[6] - Quote
Chalithra Lathar wrote:http://i.imgur.com/G8LGsj7.png
apparently this is banned, and CCP claims to have a way to 'detect' it. Don't use windowed mode (or desktop window manager) if you want to avoid being banned.
...That is actually more information than my current ISBoxer setup, with larger sizes in regards to the ore hold part, which is doable if I had one of those ultra-wide monitors. This rule is dumb. |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2016.02.24 18:01:02 -
[7] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote: dude read the blog
I have and it doesn't say that. Using the ingame window mode does not give you an unfair advantage. Every player has access to those options.[/quote]
Every player has access to ISBoxer too. Not every player has financial access to bigger/more monitors. |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2016.02.24 18:21:50 -
[8] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Shadoroth wrote: Every player has access to ISBoxer too. Not every player has financial access to bigger/more monitors.
Use IsBoxer if you want. Or put each individual client on its own monitor, or use window mode. Eve-o preview is also an option. Just make sure if you do use a 3rd-party program you don't use it to break the EULA.
I would like to direct your attention here:
Chalithra Lathar wrote:http://i.imgur.com/G8LGsj7.png
apparently this is banned, and CCP claims to have a way to 'detect' it. Don't use windowed mode (or desktop window manager) if you want to avoid being banned.
with ISboxer, you can take those visible pieces of the other clients, and put them on a different part of your screen (not overlaying a different eve client). Like the example, you could also click that part of the screen, and it would focus on that client (just like in the example). The difference, however, is that with ISBoxer, there is no over-laying involved, yet with the example posted, the eve client repositioning, there IS overlay.
Therefore, the outrage is, what the actual hell is bannable, and what is not? |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2016.02.24 18:47:55 -
[9] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Isboxer is not banned.
Certain aspects of the program will mean you break the EULA mainly the broadcasting and the videofx-dxnothing parts of it.
There is a sticky in general discussion about it if you want more details.
From my understanding, repeater pass-through of videoFX breaks EULA. VideoFX itself, as long as its not used in an overlay, should not break EULA, but it might because ~vagueness~ |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2016.02.24 19:01:04 -
[10] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Shadoroth wrote: From my understanding, repeater pass-through of videoFX breaks EULA. VideoFX itself, as long as its not used in an overlay, should not break EULA, but it might because ~vagueness~
It does break the EULA as it changes the way the game is played. Each client should be playable as though it was the only client. By having elements of client ie; overview or HUD seperate you can't play that client without an additional client open.
Then having multiple monitors also breaks EULA, as having videoFX without repeater passthrough is just a cheaper alternative to having every account have its own monitor. |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2016.02.25 21:44:14 -
[11] - Quote
Memphis Baas wrote: Pressing G3 to send a wall of text to Jita local chat, so you can scam with text and links to your contracts = bannable.
Ctrl+C bannable. Gotcha. |

Shadoroth
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
16
|
Posted - 2016.02.26 06:35:45 -
[12] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:Uh. I launched a client and forgot about it, and left it under my browser. Then it was very odd to me that I could hear EVE sounds as my mouse moved around the screen. Apparently my mouse location was registering in the EVE client when it was hidden behind another window? Is this new? Am I going to be penalized for a false positive if I find myself in a similar scenario in the future?
Don't lie. You were looking at dotlan you cheater. Enjoy your ban. |
| |
|