EVE Search - Sticky:Dev blog: The second CSM X summit

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:Dev blog: The second CSM X summit - meeting minutes included

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)

CCP Guard C C P C C P Alliance 5254	Posted - 2016.02.26 17:11:20 - [1] - Quote Last week we had the last CSM summit for CSM X and next week we open the election for CSM XI. In this dev blog we go over how the summit went, share with you 79 pages of minutes from the summit, and publish the final list of candidates for the upcoming election. Have a great weekend. CCP Guard \| EVE Community Developer \|-á@CCP_Guard

big miker New Eden Scallywags Zero.Four Ops 456	Posted - 2016.02.26 17:37:14 - [2] - Quote HYDE4CSM Latest video: Ferocious 8.0 'Officer' Nightmare!
Shalmon Aliatus Bluestar Enterprises The Craftsmen 7	Posted - 2016.02.26 17:44:59 - [3] - Quote Can you sort the candidates in alphabetical order ? Or explain why they are in this order ? Makes it very hard to find a candidate on the list

CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 1424	Posted - 2016.02.26 17:48:43 - [4] - Quote Shalmon Aliatus wrote: Can you sort the candidates in alphabetical order ? Or explain why they are in this order ? Makes it very hard to find a candidate on the list As it turns out, the order is just the order they came out of the database. I'll edit in a sorted list in a moment. EDIT: The list is now sorted (might take a few minutes to work through the various caches). CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Shalmon Aliatus Bluestar Enterprises The Craftsmen 7	Posted - 2016.02.26 17:57:28 - [5] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Shalmon Aliatus wrote: Can you sort the candidates in alphabetical order ? Or explain why they are in this order ? Makes it very hard to find a candidate on the list As it turns out, the order is just the order they came out of the database. I'll edit in a sorted list in a moment. EDIT: The list is now sorted (might take a few minutes to work through the various caches). Thank you.
Mike Azariah The Scope Gallente Federation 3411	Posted - 2016.02.26 18:40:36 - [6] - Quote Actually, Randomization is a good thing as there is a possibility of people getting more votes if they are higher in the alphabet as lazy folks just click the first thing they see. m Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯\|(pâä)/¯
Niko Lorenzio United Eve Directorate 519	Posted - 2016.02.26 18:43:44 - [7] - Quote Thank you for the honest dev blog. I believe honesty and trust are the foundation of any strong relationship. I really appreciate you taking on that tone and if I should have the privilege of working with you, look forward to reciprocating it.
Niko Lorenzio United Eve Directorate 519	Posted - 2016.02.26 18:45:13 - [8] - Quote Mike Azariah wrote: Actually, Randomization is a good thing as there is a possibility of people getting more votes if they are higher in the alphabet as lazy folks just click the first thing they see. m I guess that kinda balances out with getting primaried all the time by lazy FCs
Dierdra Vaal Interstellar Stargate Syndicate 347	Posted - 2016.02.26 18:55:45 - [9] - Quote All candidates have been sent their Vote Match login details via Evemail. Please take the time to fill out your profile and survey so you can be included in the matching process! :) Veto #205 Director Emeritus at EVE University CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman Evesterdam organiser and CSM Vote Match founder Co-Author of the Galactic Party Planning Guide
Scotsman Howard The Scope Gallente Federation 31	Posted - 2016.02.26 19:31:41 - [10] - Quote Very nice!! I will admit it was kind of annoying having to wait for a week or two for the notes, but the quality was far better this year than last (which I think was the point of the delay). Well done CCP and CSM (not sure who made them but will give credit to everyone. It was also nice that not everything was NDA blocked this year as well.

SurrenderMonkey Space Llama Industries 2108	Posted - 2016.02.26 19:35:33 - [11] - Quote Quote: They are thinking of increasing the taxes in NPC stations, by increasing the brokerGÇÖs fee in all NPC stations to 5%. "Help, I'm bored with missions!" http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
Rivr Luzade Kenshin. DARKNESS. 2345	Posted - 2016.02.26 20:35:03 - [12] - Quote These minutes clearly show that some people have no idea how the game works (I look at you, Thoric, your responses and opinions on sov are ridiculous) and still advice CCP on the matter... and they have a potential for a flood of tears of biblical proportions. Interesting read. UI Improvement Collective My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
Valuv Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde 2	Posted - 2016.02.26 21:55:52 - [13] - Quote Attribute removal? High Res Textures?
Freelancer117 So you want to be a Hero 455	Posted - 2016.02.26 23:14:10 - [14] - Quote Woot, we are no doubt going to see more CCP Guard / Logibro dev blogs Eve online is : A) mining simulator B) glorified chatroom C) spreadsheets online D) CCP Games Pay to Win at skill leveling, with instant gratification http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg http://bit.ly/1egr4mF
marly cortez Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance 133	Posted - 2016.02.26 23:54:30 - [15] - Quote Freelancer117 wrote: Woot, we are no doubt going to see more CCP Guard / Logibro dev blogs Would prefer to see CCP taking less time with putting out Blogs and more time listening to what Players actually wanted from them tbh, Impression you get currently is 'Fozzies on a High and he just ain't listening to anyone'. Hope that does not get lost in translation...
Altrue Exploration Frontier inc 2001	Posted - 2016.02.27 12:04:20 - [16] - Quote Niko Lorenzio wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: Actually, Randomization is a good thing as there is a possibility of people getting more votes if they are higher in the alphabet as lazy folks just click the first thing they see. m I guess that kinda balances out with getting primaried all the time by lazy FCs This guy knows what's up. Signature Tanking Best Tanking Retired Exploration Frontier Inc [Ex-F] CEO - Ex-BRAVE - Eve-guides.fr
Shalmon Aliatus Bluestar Enterprises The Craftsmen 7	Posted - 2016.02.27 13:24:11 - [17] - Quote Quote: "Endie added that the thing that drives people away the most is when they have a huge goal and they aim for it and they achieve, but it horrendous cost." I guess there is also the people that just can't have huge goals anymore, because they already did everything. EVE is an old game with old players that have done everything and at the moment there is no endgame content except "more of it" I hope there will be some stuff soon where the players have to work hard, with the possibility of failure or victory at a horrendous cost. EVE is most fun when sh*t hits the fan, you and your friends lose some stuff and you still somehow manage to complete your objective or at least save the rest of your fleet. Otherwise it is just grinding the same stuff over and over again, something I tried to avoid by playing EVE Online.
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe 6950	Posted - 2016.02.27 16:18:56 - [18] - Quote Shalmon Aliatus wrote: Quote: "Endie added that the thing that drives people away the most is when they have a huge goal and they aim for it and they achieve, but it horrendous cost." I guess there is also the people that just can't have huge goals anymore, because they already did everything. EVE is an old game with old players that have done everything and at the moment there is no endgame content except "more of it" Multiboxing your 2nd, 3rd and 4th titan huge goals each, very rare expensive and powerful just got a little harder too, huh. CCP Grimmi: With all players on a single server and in direct competition with each other even your trade and industry activities are PvP.
Indahmawar Fazmarai 4801	Posted - 2016.02.28 00:08:12 - [19] - Quote I've browsed the minutes based on section headlines and Team names (why don't they have a more descriptive name? Do we really need to know and remember that "Team size matters = UI?"), and apparently there was no specific/dedicated discussion of PvE? It's a bit disappointing. All I've read was about Drifter incursions not working as expected... Not expected by CCP; since they're not-working exactly as anyone with, say, 7 years of experience in PvE, would expect them to "unwork". Looks like some issues just will never be tackled. Even CCP Denebola kinda misfired; why does she focus on "things that work" rather than adress "things that horribly don't work"? CCP Seagull: "EVE should be a universe where the infrastructure you build and fight over is as player driven and dynamic as the EVE market is now". 62% of players: "We're not interested. May we have Plan B, please?" CCP Seagull: "What Plan B?"
Memphis Baas 1230	Posted - 2016.02.28 02:22:46 - [20] - Quote Idea for dreads: - Change capital gun ammo to have a small radius AoE at the point of impact with the target. Not to do more damage to the target, but rounds of that size caliber should be AoE'ish on impact. - And the reason why: Allow dread pilots to form a chain / coordinate fire / sync their weapons and achieve bombardment of a volume of space (AoE) - basically give them a mini-superweapon if multiple dreads enter this coordinated mode.

Amarisen Gream Divine Demise Apocalypse Now. 211	Posted - 2016.02.28 07:59:19 - [21] - Quote Read this wall of text - enjoyed parts didn't like other parts Suggestions for CCP - - add a post or something to the web site that list what team handles what - this is good for both players and CSM - as it seems a lot of the report was "that is a different team" - I know you all have a plan for New Eden, but could we see a survey that list the current projects you all are working on and let the players voice what they fill as a whole needs priority. And figure out a reward to motivate more than just the forum trolls to come vote. Some of the post talking about how you all have plans for this or that and then realize you don't know if you like what you are doing - please, for lack better description, get your heads out of your arse. - We have asked for ORE Command ships in the destroyer size for a long time - - We miners who live in Null have wondered for a long time at what changes will take place for the Rorq and still we have no solid plans. "The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1 DIDE- is open to new members
Oxide Ammar 232	Posted - 2016.02.28 11:14:43 - [22] - Quote Quote: Jayne asked how CCP thought the drifter incursions were going. CCP Affinity said they're not going as well as CCP wanted. One of the problems they see is that players are hesitant to tackle them due to the extreme difficulties. This sums up CCP vision regarding PVE, no perspective..no vision of what can be introduced as new blood to PVE. A year old PVE player can told you before wasting development hours on how drifters incursion is fail introduction to PVE but w/e floats your boat CCP. Lady Areola Fappington: -áSolo PVP isn't dead!-á You just need to make sure you have your booster, remote rep, cyno, and emergency Falcon alts logged in and ready before you do any solo PVPing.
Shalmon Aliatus Bluestar Enterprises The Craftsmen 7	Posted - 2016.02.28 11:25:27 - [23] - Quote Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: I've browsed the minutes based on section headlines and Team names (why don't they have a more descriptive name? Do we really need to know and remember that "Team size matters = UI?"), and apparently there was no specific/dedicated discussion of PvE? I guess the teams have multiple tasks. Also doesn't help to switch your team name after every task, so nobody knows who is in which team. Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: It's a bit disappointing. All I've read was about Drifter incursions not working as expected... Not expected by CCP; since they're not-working exactly as anyone with, say, 7 years of experience in PvE, would expect them to "unwork". I really hope they get drifter incursions to work and make it something players have to work hard for to get rid off. The current problem with PvE is that player figure out how to win and then repeat it until it gets boring. I remember how cool it was to rescue my first damsel. The first thing I did when I got the Damsel bodyguard was flying to the sun, throwing him out of the airlock and alpha the container with a 1400mm Howitzer Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Looks like some issues just will never be tackled. Even CCP Denebola kinda misfired; why does she focus on "things that work" rather than adress "things that horribly don't work"? For marketing it is easier to promote things that work
Shalmon Aliatus Bluestar Enterprises The Craftsmen 7	Posted - 2016.02.28 11:39:39 - [24] - Quote Memphis Baas wrote: Idea for dreads: - Change capital gun ammo to have a small radius AoE at the point of impact with the target. Not to do more damage to the target, but rounds of that size caliber should be AoE'ish on impact. - And the reason why: Allow dread pilots to form a chain / coordinate fire / sync their weapons and achieve bombardment of a volume of space (AoE) - basically give them a mini-superweapon if multiple dreads enter this coordinated mode. I like this idea. But that ability should have some drawbacks, otherwise you have permadeath-zones on gates. Maybe make a new gun instead of just having a new ammo. Capital gun, very high rate of fire, uses large amounts of smaller ammo (Large), takes very long to reload. Since you can't refit with combat timer (and have the wrong ammo with you anyway), this prevents caps from just switching to a different ammo type when they realise that the subcaps are killing them.
Freelancer117 So you want to be a Hero 456	Posted - 2016.02.28 18:31:37 - [25] - Quote Mike Azariah wrote: Actually, Randomization is a good thing as there is a possibility of people getting more votes if they are higher in the alphabet as lazy folks just click the first thing they see. m So I read some of the minutes, it's a nice large chunk to be divided over the weekend But have you had the opportunity Mike, to ask CCP Games to invest into bigger text boxes and perhaps have even voice-overs for the newbro's that are coming to the game in 2016. Regards, a Freelancer ps: here is a picture of a Squirrel Eve online is : A) mining simulator B) glorified chatroom C) spreadsheets online D) CCP Games Pay to Win at skill leveling, with instant gratification http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg http://bit.ly/1egr4mF
Indahmawar Fazmarai 4807	Posted - 2016.02.29 07:59:47 - [26] - Quote Shalmon Aliatus wrote: (...) Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Looks like some issues just will never be tackled. Even CCP Denebola kinda misfired; why does she focus on "things that work" rather than adress "things that horribly don't work"? For marketing it is easier to promote things that work For expanding your business it is easier to keep customers willing to leave than turn non-customers into potential customers. Quitting customers can be divided into wrong, offended and confused. The wrong are impossible to keep, but offended and confused can be kept easier than just turning non-customers into customers. CCP Seagull: "EVE should be a universe where the infrastructure you build and fight over is as player driven and dynamic as the EVE market is now". 62% of players: "We're not interested. May we have Plan B, please?" CCP Seagull: "What Plan B?"
ChromeStriker Out of Focus Odin's Call 1018	Posted - 2016.02.29 15:22:43 - [27] - Quote Wormhole coverage is again in a sorry state :( As a corpmate put very well... CSM members are out of touch when it comes to WH's No Worries
Atum Eclipse Industrials Quantum Forge 121	Posted - 2016.03.01 19:48:13 - [28] - Quote Putting the entirety of the security portion of the summit under NDA isn't really doing anybody a favor. Sure, it's best not to openly discuss specific means and methods, but there's nothing wrong with letting us know that the implementation of a new tool improved detection of mining bots by n percentage points and ratting bots by x points, or something the CSM suggested during the last time summit reduced the false positive rate of suspected ISK mules by r points. It's also interesting to see how much dirty ISK is being removed from the economy, or if certain ships/items tend to show up repeatedly. PS... I miss CCP Sreegs' security chart porn
Suede Caldari Provisions Caldari State 109	Posted - 2016.03.08 11:48:48 - [29] - Quote marly cortez wrote: Freelancer117 wrote: Woot, we are no doubt going to see more CCP Guard / Logibro dev blogs Would prefer to see CCP taking less time with putting out Blogs and more time listening to what Players actually wanted from them tbh, Impression you get currently is 'Fozzies on a High and he just ain't listening to anyone'. Hope that does not get lost in translation... Shame that CCP do not even reply to there own dev blogs as much as they should. and SP buying/ SP injectors was one of the worse ideas ever for CCP just to make money. Just a shame and let down that CSM did not even bring it up more with CCP in regards to the SP injectors. Name change and Sex change allowance License extension for 5 days, 2500 Aurum
Jenshae Chiroptera 2625	Posted - 2016.03.10 03:16:49 - [30] - Quote Quote: Chance talked about how his group instituted a rule where people were not allowed to talk about injectors due to some people getting upset over others talking about having them so much. CCP stated that they're carefully watching to see what the longer term effects of skill trading are. In other words, waiting for the players to calm down and watch the cash roll in. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids I will be voting for Xenuria because... EVE is becoming shallow and childish; it will not satisfy either crowd.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.