EVE Search - Belt cans

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Belt cans

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ghosttr Amarr The Department of Resource Control	Posted - 2007.02.06 01:14:00 - [1] Almost anywhere i go in .5 empire systems there are loads of lagtastic cans placed all around the asteroid belts and ice fields. In my entire time of playing this game i have never seen the owner of the can anywhere near it. I don't know how much lag they cause, but i think they need to go the way of the insta-jump bookmark I think that secure cans should have a time limit as to how long they last after your last access. And cans that are left unused for an extended period of time should pop. FIX OUR DESTROYERS!
hotgirl933	Posted - 2007.02.06 01:18:00 - [2] been suggested should vanish if account holder goes inactive as it stands tho u need to guess the password to get at it. Petition CCP with a stuck petition saying youre stuck due to lag ( has happened to me sometimes in empier) CCP want solutions to problems in threads as well appaerntly remove all jetcans that have been placed where the accout hodler is inactive or make their contents available for anyone to loot and recover the can ( 6 month inactivity rules)
ghosttr Amarr The Department of Resource Control	Posted - 2007.02.06 01:24:00 - [3] Originally by: hotgirl933 been suggested should vanish if account holder goes inactive as it stands tho u need to guess the password to get at it. Petition CCP with a stuck petition saying youre stuck due to lag ( has happened to me sometimes in empier) CCP want solutions to problems in threads as well appaerntly remove all jetcans that have been placed where the accout hodler is inactive or make their contents available for anyone to loot and recover the can ( 6 month inactivity rules) The time period needs to be much shorter, then active accounts can spam the cans in system and never have to touch them after they are initially launched. Maybe a period of a week or two, so if someone wants to spam cans everywhere then they must have upkeep on the cans to make sure they dont pop. FIX OUR DESTROYERS!
ghosttr Amarr The Department of Resource Control	Posted - 2007.02.06 03:09:00 - [4] Seems like i was ignored and this post slipped to the bottom of the pile. FIX OUR DESTROYERS!
El Verbatim	Posted - 2007.02.08 12:30:00 - [5] or...or.... limit the amount of containers you can anchor by tying it to the Anchoring skill. Give at the same time an overview of all the belt cans you have in space, somewhere in your assets window or something like that. Maybe even add the possibility to remotely 'unanchor' and let it float till it disappears? If not, move there, unachnor, scoop or let it float. Then you can anchor a new container in the system you like.
Niccolado Starwalker Shadow Templars	Posted - 2007.02.08 12:33:00 - [6] Originally by: El Verbatim or...or.... limit the amount of containers you can anchor by tying it to the Anchoring skill. Give at the same time an overview of all the belt cans you have in space, somewhere in your assets window or something like that. Maybe even add the possibility to remotely 'unanchor' and let it float till it disappears? If not, move there, unachnor, scoop or let it float. Then you can anchor a new container in the system you like. Excellent Idea! and in addition, let every level you have in the skill also count as 1 month per point. So if you have level 5 you can have 5 cans up-and-running for 5 months! Originally by: Eldo Davip PORTRAITS OMFG WOOT. WE R GONIG FOR MROE BREEE!!!!11
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2007.02.08 12:43:00 - [7] Originally by: Niccolado Starwalker Originally by: El Verbatim or...or.... limit the amount of containers you can anchor by tying it to the Anchoring skill. Give at the same time an overview of all the belt cans you have in space, somewhere in your assets window or something like that. Maybe even add the possibility to remotely 'unanchor' and let it float till it disappears? If not, move there, unachnor, scoop or let it float. Then you can anchor a new container in the system you like. Excellent Idea! and in addition, let every level you have in the skill also count as 1 month per point. So if you have level 5 you can have 5 cans up-and-running for 5 months! And if you need more? I have three cans anchored I actively use right now, I'll be looking at anchoring at least 5 more in the next couple of weeks. ---------- IBTL \o/ EVE is upside down! WTZ+Slower Warp=Win
Niccolado Starwalker Shadow Templars	Posted - 2007.02.08 12:54:00 - [8] Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Niccolado Starwalker Originally by: El Verbatim or...or.... limit the amount of containers you can anchor by tying it to the Anchoring skill. Give at the same time an overview of all the belt cans you have in space, somewhere in your assets window or something like that. Maybe even add the possibility to remotely 'unanchor' and let it float till it disappears? If not, move there, unachnor, scoop or let it float. Then you can anchor a new container in the system you like. Excellent Idea! and in addition, let every level you have in the skill also count as 1 month per point. So if you have level 5 you can have 5 cans up-and-running for 5 months! And if you need more? I have three cans anchored I actively use right now, I'll be looking at anchoring at least 5 more in the next couple of weeks. Well, you can always have the additional skills. Advaned anchoring maybe? I dunno. But dont forget the point. The whole idea is to reduce the ammount of anchored containers in space. It does after all create lag and trash in space. Originally by: Eldo Davip PORTRAITS OMFG WOOT. WE R GONIG FOR MROE BREEE!!!!11
Shameless Avenger	Posted - 2007.02.08 13:43:00 - [9] I agree to both: 1) Time limit on secure cans; Use it or loose it. 2) Limit ammount of anchored cans, tied to skills. And I add: 3) Bigger secure cans so people don't have to use as many.
Dotar Sojat Reality Check	Posted - 2007.02.08 13:46:00 - [10] I think CCP should allow all anchored cans to be hacked by those that have the skill, allowing them to open the can and scoop the loot. After the can has been hacked it should automatically disassociate from its owner and become salvageable.
CodeR70 Gallente Tranquility Astronautics	Posted - 2007.02.08 13:49:00 - [11] And if you need more? I have three cans anchored I actively use right now, I'll be looking at anchoring at least 5 more in the next couple of weeks. Then you just have to unanchor the others so you can put up new ones on new places. I just don't see how you can actively use 8 cans at the same time.
Jack DuVal	Posted - 2007.02.08 13:56:00 - [12] When not touched for 4 weeks, the can-security system got outdated and they become hackable (with hacking lvl V). Pls no popping of secure cans after 6 months, change their color over time or so, after 4-5 months they get rusty and just need hacking lvl I. and my personal favorite, and completely crazy: After a year, they become historic artifacts and just serve as a collector's item
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2007.02.08 14:04:00 - [13] Edited by: Crumplecorn on 08/02/2007 14:03:21 Originally by: CodeR70 Edited by: CodeR70 on 08/02/2007 13:47:02 Originally by: Crumplecorn And if you need more? I have three cans anchored I actively use right now, I'll be looking at anchoring at least 5 more in the next couple of weeks. Then you just have to unanchor the others so you can put up new ones on new places. I just don't see how you can actively use 8 cans at the same time. Your understanding, as they say, is not required. Originally by: Niccolado Starwalker Well, you can always have the additional skills. Advaned anchoring maybe? I dunno. But dont forget the point. The whole idea is to reduce the ammount of anchored containers in space. It does after all create lag and trash in space. I have plenty of skills to be training as it is thanks. And lag? Even with wrecks, mission runners, fleet battles, etc etc, a few secure cans are going cause significant lag? Edit to clarify: The generality of your idea does not account for the fact that my secure cans are all at safespots. All things going well neither you nor anyone else besides myself will ever be on the same grid as them. An idea that tackles can-ridden belts specifically, OTOH, is a different story. ---------- IBTL \o/ EVE is upside down! WTZ+Slower Warp=Win
CodeR70 Gallente Tranquility Astronautics	Posted - 2007.02.08 14:21:00 - [14] Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 08/02/2007 14:03:21 Originally by: CodeR70 Edited by: CodeR70 on 08/02/2007 13:47:02 Originally by: Crumplecorn And if you need more? I have three cans anchored I actively use right now, I'll be looking at anchoring at least 5 more in the next couple of weeks. Then you just have to unanchor the others so you can put up new ones on new places. I just don't see how you can actively use 8 cans at the same time. Your understanding, as they say, is not required. True, but it would make it easier for people to understand why you want to create additional lag to the belts we all are using.
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2007.02.08 14:26:00 - [15] Originally by: CodeR70 Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 08/02/2007 14:03:21 Originally by: CodeR70 Edited by: CodeR70 on 08/02/2007 13:47:02 Originally by: Crumplecorn And if you need more? I have three cans anchored I actively use right now, I'll be looking at anchoring at least 5 more in the next couple of weeks. Then you just have to unanchor the others so you can put up new ones on new places. I just don't see how you can actively use 8 cans at the same time. Your understanding, as they say, is not required. True, but it would make it easier for people to understand why you want to create additional lag to the belts we all are using. From the post directly above this: Originally by: Crumplecorn Edit to clarify: The generality of your idea does not account for the fact that my secure cans are all at safespots. All things going well neither you nor anyone else besides myself will ever be on the same grid as them. I don't care about belts, at least not ones in highsec. I care about an idea that restricts the number of cans I can use. ---------- IBTL \o/ EVE is upside down! WTZ+Slower Warp=Win
CodeR70 Gallente Tranquility Astronautics	Posted - 2007.02.08 15:08:00 - [16] Originally by: Crumplecorn I don't care about belts, at least not ones in highsec. I care about an idea that restricts the number of cans I can use. My understanding is not required, so I wont.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.