|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 05:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Too much EFT. With blasters being what it is, brutix does almost no dps at point range, even with null. Cyclone will kite it until it dies. Undock once in a while. 
You are an idiot and I am now unable to read anything else that you post. I'm afraid if I read anything else from you then I will catch the stupids. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 07:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
Smabs wrote:Gallente ships are already the second fastest in the game and are so close to agility compared to minmatar that it's barely noticeable. How much faster do they need to be?
They won't be happy till they have the speed of Minmatar, the range of Caldari, and the DPS of... what they have already. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 08:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote: As I suggested in a previous post, the fix needs to include a nerf to projectile weapons, which are horribly unbalanced right now. Combine this with some new web drones and I think you'll end up with a more balanced, and more interesting game.
Projectile weapons are not unbalanced. Tracking enhancers falloff could be reduced a little and there are a couple Minmatar ships that could have their falloff bonus changed to a tracking bonus or something similar, however, to nerf projectiles would be to relegate Minmatar back to the days where they were considered "Eve on hard mode" because of their massively low dps and inability to apply any dps without getting into web/scram range which everyone knows = death to Minmatar against any other race out there.
They are made to fight in falloff and have the speed to keep them there. As it is now, falloff is a bit out of hand. Not projectile weapons. Flat nerf to a weapon system when people complain about a couple ships is just idiotic. Even more so when half of those ships aren't even Minmatar, but are a pirate race that uses the Minmatar weapon system. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 09:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote: yep , Blasters seems fine to some extend (most hybrid ships are still crap), but ac-s are just too good , fitting requirement should be increased a bit, so winmatar cant fit everything onto their superspeed ships to make them more tanky/more everything as a blaster ship. I would also lower close range ammo dmg.
Let's look at the facts.
425mm AC IIs, the largest in the medium AC range Power 154 CPU 25 Duration 5.625 Optimal 2400 Falloff 9600 Tracking 0.1056 Damage Mod 3.465
Heavy Neutron Blaster II Power 187 CPU 33 Duration 5.25 Optimal 3600 Falloff 5000 Tracking 0.12 Damage Mod 4.41
Heavy Pulse Laser II Power 231 CPU 35 Duration 5.25 Optimal 12000 Falloff 4000 Tracking 0.08125 Damage Mod 3.6
The ACs are the easiest to fit, next are the Blasters, and hardest to fit are the Lasers. Highest Optimal is Amarr, then Gallente, then Minmatar. Highest Falloff is Minmatar, then Amarr, then Gallente. (Maybe Gallente should have higher falloff then Amarr since Amarr has the highest optimal, this would put Gallente middle ground on both Optimal and Falloff) Fastest Duration is Amarr tied with Gallente, with Minmatar being a bit slower than both of them. Gallente has the best damage mod, Amarr has the second best damage mod, Minmatar has the least damage mod. Gallente has the best tracking, Minmatar has the second best tracking, and Amarr has the least tracking.
For the most part, this all looks fairly well ballanced. This would then lead to the ships needing to be looked at, not a weapon system.
Go over this again. Minmatar has the lowest damage mod, the lowest optimal, lowest cycle duration, second best tracking, and best falloff.
Gallente has the best tracking, the best damage mod, is tied for first for cycling time, second best optimal, worst falloff. ( I think they could do with a bit more falloff, but that's just me. )
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 09:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote: gallente... those are called blasters not gallente:P btw you missed some very needed parts like : cap use , dmg type , ammo types t1 t2 , all of those are ac favoured which greatly moves your balanced comparison into winac, imba op pulse t2 range and poor blasters
Which then makes it an ammo issue, not a weapon system issue. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 04:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Diemost with 2 nanos goes at 2km/s. Vega with same 2 nanos goes at 3km/s. That's a 50% difference, plus less agility and acceleration. The fact that this is "second fastest in game" is precisely why Winmatar wins. 
If you hadn't noticed, the Vagabond uses one of its ship bonuses to get this speed. It's not like its a racial problem. It's the fact that the vagabond was designed to be a fast cruiser and sacrifices one of its ship bonuses that could be used for damage, etc, and uses it for speed. Of course it is faster. It's supposed to be.
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 05:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Umega wrote:Here's to hoping that the idiots don't turn variety and varying play styles and choices into all the same thing.. not much of a vanilla fan myself. Want my ice cream shop to have a wide degree in choices for me to taste and enjoy.
+1 FOR 51 FLAVORS!!!! |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 05:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Goose99 wrote:Then specify the situation. I'm not typing out a wall of text covering all possible scenarios. More importantly, how do you like your newly "buffed" rails? Gotta have some non-thread derailing content.  Lets start with this: I am a total ******* moron that never ever undocks and I need help figuring out how to play this crazy fandangled "Eve Online". Please provide your three favorite ships, a fit for each, and some basic idea how to fly them. Please include tips like specifically what to do when you get tackled by something larger than you and what to do when you're in something much bigger than what's tackled you. And there it is, ad hominem defined. 
OK, obviously you have no idea what ad hominem means. I really think you just saw it on a box of cereal somewhere and decided to throw it around in every post to try to make yourself sound more intelligent.
"An ad hominem is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it."
The post that you are quoting is Liang asking you to pretend that Lian is an idiot noob. Doing so, Liang then asks you to explain some of your favorite ships and their setups. After that, you were asked to explain how to use them in specific situations.
At no point did Liang call you a name or point out any beliefs or characteristics of yours, that might be negative, in an attempt to assassinate your opinion on the matter. All that Liang did was what you asked Liang to do.
However, you are still an idiot. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 09:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote:at least he is trying to learn not like u :P you will be forever an idiot^^
my fav ship is the tornado cause it has total imba alpha due to ******** overboosted winmatard arties how to use it just load with short range ammo warp to belt target the closest afk botter mackinaw and press f1 easy dumbproof matar style :P 2nd is mackinaw for high sec mining , after tornado took care of competitors it has a free belt full of ice to make some tasty isk
"Several corp mates say they're overpowered now" what ******** corp you are in lilung...
At no point in any of his writings has he tried to learn anything. All he has done is spouted the same incoherent crap over and over. His only argument is that he is right (without any substantial proof) and that everyone else has to prove him wrong (Even though anyone he actually plays this game knows that his arguments are swiss cheese). However, at least he can form full sentences, unlike you.
I give him credit for at least being a good troll, if he's truly not at stupid as he seems to be in his posts. You, however, are an even worse idiot. Your terrible typing and sentence structure is enough to make the saintliest nun shoot a room full of children in frustration.
I am not mad, I'm actually in a wonderful mood. Work is over in 4 minutes! :D |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 15:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote: Personal choice, that's all. I choose not to use my real life name, either, although I don't have anything to hide.
It is entirely up to you whether you take the contents of my posts seriously or not. They are not intended solely for your benefit, so it doesn't really matter either way.
I don't take them seriously either. *shrug* Alt = Troll or Terrible
|
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 15:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote: Unless I'm mistaken, changing ammo takes just as long as reloading the current ammo - so, you can switch ammo types roughly about the same time you'd need to reload anyways, with very little loss - if any - in DPS. And, as you pointed out, hybrids need to reload, too. So, the reload advantage to hybrids is 5 sec, irregardless if you change ammo types or not.
Yes, you are mistaken. 10 seconds of not firing your guns is a significant drop in dps. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:[quote=ElCholo] Does reloading the same ammo, when your guns run dry, take the same amount of time as swapping to a different ammo type? Projectiles do not have a zero reload time.
They take twice the time as Gallente do, and in a typical fight, you don't run out of ammo before you or the person you are fighting dies. Unless you are fighting more than one person or they are using an active tank.
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 21:33:00 -
[13] - Quote
Confirming that Gallente ships are terrible. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 22:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Confirming that a ****** fleet filled with fail fits with no context or circumstances provided going up against T2, Faction and Pirate Faction Ships are a good measure of what what a race can do. I don't know perhaps that purger rigged Hurricane, T1 fit beam Harb, and T1 gunned Thrasher are all part of a Super Secret PvP setup. I am interested to know how they planned to use that survey scanner. I mean perhaps I am further mistaken when I noticed that the defeated side is from a virtually unknown Alliance with less kills combined then I have (Which isn't much  ) and more then twice as many losses as they have kills. Maybe a fact made worse when the other fleet was made up of Veto Corp, Rooks and Kings, Pandemic Legion, oh and you were there. o/ So ElCholo well you were kicking this unknown Alliances Fail Fleet with a combo of pretty prominent PvP Groups in rather expensive ships is that when you realized that these good folks truly represent the best PvP opposition to your fleet? They must have put on one impressive performance I dare say. As Survey Scanning Harbingers are well known to do. Edit/ Know what, I know I suck at PvP but I am just gonna take a moment and pat myself on the back for being single handedly better then this entire Shadow of Honor Alliance. Thanks EnCholo that was a much needed ego boost. 
You don't see that they had twice that number and carrier support... because we didn't lose anything. Troll on fail troll. :)
And you pointed out another good thing. You are right, we are a skilled group. Going against folks like the EFT trolls in this forum who say that Gallente aren't good. We are proving that competent pilots in Gallente ships are capable of taking on the crap drake and minmatar blobs out there. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 22:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:ElCholo wrote: You don't see that they had twice that number and carrier support... because we didn't lose anything. Troll on fail troll. :)
Where did I troll. All I have is your word that they had that and for all I know you could have had more Logi's. Your Confirming, confirms nothing. The Irony. ElCholo wrote: And you pointed out another good thing. You are right, we are a skilled group. Going against folks like the EFT trolls in this forum who say that Gallente aren't good. We are proving that competent pilots in Gallente ships are capable of taking on the crap drake and minmatar blobs out there.
Anyone is capable of taking out crap fit fleets flown by pilots who don't know what they are doing but Ok.  I guess you proved me wrong taking out those elite PvP'ers with your humble fleet. Balance should always be decided in a contest between the best PvP'ers and the worst.
That's the funny part. I'm far from the best. I'm about average. I just PvP more than I complain on the forums. I'm trying to show people on the forums that if they would pvp more and complain less, that they could get good fights too. And they would also see that all ships are good, you just have to come up with a good fleet for them, instead of expecting them to all do the same thing in the same way. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 22:25:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nikuno wrote:ElCholo wrote: That's the funny part. I'm far from the best. I'm about average. I just PvP more than I complain on the forums. I'm trying to show people on the forums that if they would pvp more and complain less, that they could get good fights too. And they would also see that all ships are good, you just have to come up with a good fleet for them, instead of expecting them to all do the same thing in the same way.
And that's where you begin to miss the point. These ships are already agreed as being good at station/gate camping and if they can be dropped at zero in a relatively small engagement. But that's less than 5% of eve. For 25% of the player base who are Gallente, and for however many of the Caldari pilots that have discovered they have turret ships too. Why should the weapon systems of choice for such a significant part of the players be sidelined?
You really don't have a clue, do you. :( The point is that we are roaming, not station/gate camping. Roaming is what a large portion of Eve does. It really saddens me that people just don't get the big picture. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 23:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
http://www.rancyin.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=12045666
Another good one where we were outnumbered. Both sides were taking sentry fire due to terrible planning on targets called. However, Gallente isn't terrible. Blasters aren't terrible. :) It's players that are terrible. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 23:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
Sebastian N Cain wrote:
You really don't have a clue, do you. :( The point is that we are roaming, not station/gate camping. Roaming is what a large portion of Eve does. It really saddens me that people just don't get the big picture.
And against clueless people who earned their kills by camping and hunting solo missionrunners with a gang and thinking pvp is klick, target, klick, orbit, F1 F2 F3 in less than well thought through fitted ships (let me guess, you had nasty buggers like ecm-drones that they had no clue how to deal with, they didn-Št even try to take out your rr-support first and instead of keeping the range open they went in to scram you (because they likely thought bc against cruiser? easy kills) despite having mwd themselves that would also get shut down) this is well and all, but since many people are now and then up against people that know what they are doing, most prefer hardware that isn-Št coming with a handicap built in.[/quote]
Confirming that what you said is true about the majority of people who fly Minmatar and who complain that Gallente is under powered. What we are doing is proving that Gallente can best other fleets by flying competent and cohesive setups. If you don't like that this can happen then you are on of the former pilots and are unable to compete with them by creating your own competent and cohesive fleet setup and fighting the larger group of pilots with your wits.
First you complain that Gallente are under powered and then when shown otherwise you complain that the people flying the Gallente are only picking on unskilled players. Yet, what you can't seem to grasp is that most of the people who spam fly Minmatar ARE in skilled players who only fly what everyone tells them is the fotm.
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 00:13:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jask Avan wrote:ElCholo wrote:What we are doing is proving that Gallente can best other fleets by flying competent and cohesive setups. Anything competent and cohesive will best those fleet you were fighting. You sound an awful lot like the guy who was arguing Armor-EWar-HAM Drake was viable based on the reasoning that somewhere, sometime, somehow... it might not die horribly. 
Another faceless alt. I sound like them except that we are fighting every fleet we come up against. Your argument is in error since most of the fleets you come up against will be like these that we have fought, not armor-ewar-ham drakes. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 02:52:00 -
[20] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Confirming the gang ElChocolo et al. are running with is pretty good. These days, you can stuff a 1600 AND neutrons on a Deimos and it cooks at 1500m/s at least. Its every Deimos pilot's dream come true.
You have uber webs on the Ashimmu, with neuting. So you've got tackle and cap warfare sorted. A couple of logis for tanking because, luls, they will primary the Deimos so their pants don't fill up first and jam their F1 keys - i mean, tanking 2 Deimos's isn't easy. Stabber fleet for bait/tackle and sig tanking.
That's a pretty nice gang. You're all jelly, forum alts, because you haven't figured out how to run decent gangs.
Correct on all but one item. :) The Stabber wasn't there as bait, it was there because poor Ran can't use blasters yet. :( He's training them though. You would be amazed at how fast Deimos can cook these days. We didn't need to bait really, we were just running head long into any gang / camp we could find. For the most part, it worked out great. We will be taking it out on a regular basis, though we are trying to replace the Ashimuu with Vigilant for the added DPS, though we may keep one Ashumu for the cap warfare which is always nice to be able to shut off hardeners with. |
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 02:54:00 -
[21] - Quote
Hungry Eyes wrote:ElCholo wrote:Confirming that Gallente ships are terrible. confirming that youre still a goddamn troll
I'm sorry, but you are completely incorrect. I'ma ctually trying to enlighten people. I've even gotten a group of friends together to start flying predominantly Gallente ships to show people just how terrible they aren't. Now please, be constructive, if possible. :) |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 19:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
Nikuno wrote:
I beg to differ. Check my history and you'll see that I use gallente ships most months, but to do so I have to go looking for fights pretty much on my own or in very small groups. All the other kills generally come from fleets where there is no room for gallente ships, either rail or blaster fitted. I repeat, you are arguing that a significant portion of the playerbase are expected to play with a minority and niche weapon system. This is neither balanced nor sensible, nor are you in your opinions.
My friends and I are now flying Gallente in mid sized fleets. People may be used to Gallente only being good for solo or very small fleets, but this is now due to narrow minded views and the inability to see that things have changed. They are now much more viable.
Your argument that a significant portion of the player base are expect to play with a minority weapon is an oxymoron. If it is a significant portion using them then obviously it is a significantly used weapon. They are also not nearly as niche as they used to be. This, of course, falls under that area where people must stop obeying the all mighty FOTM crowd and come up with viable fleet options, which we have. My opinion is sensible and balanced, yours, however, is lumped in with the likes of every other troll on these forums. I hope you enjoy the company. :)
By the way, we are going out roaming again today, it will be fun proving more and more people wrong. We even have a RPer in our ranks who is a member of Veto. He is writing up some fabulous stories about it. I will see if I can get him to share it here with the non-believers. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 02:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
Another win for the Gallente ships!
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=12054016
You may have to copy and paste since Eve-O sucks for linking.
You will notice that our one loss was also taking sentry fire for all of you nay sayers who will cry wolf that we only engaged when the other side is under sentry fire. :) |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 03:36:00 -
[24] - Quote
Fade Azura wrote:
lol cmon man you got 4 gallente ships in a 9 man fleet in the killmail and one is a logi and one died because his blasters forced him into range so he can be tackled back most likely causing the loss .... far cry from a gallente fleet and it was not a victory for gallente in the least. take a 20-30 man fleet of 90% gallente ships and beat an equal blob of drakes or canes or something and then you might be able to try and pass those off as any kind of proof or representation of gallente in general. and i think we both know that is not going to happen until railguns are better or equal to arties. blasters will never be a fleet weapon as long as their range remains where it is at.
Honestly are all you guys trolling or what? rofl i have never seen so much pathetic examples or claims that are so easily contradicted in my life anywhere.. either all you guys saying that gallente are all right are all trolling or you have some monetary(isk) reason for the influence you are trying to push on here. im guessing its a combination of both or maybe its just you guys all were apparently dropped on your heads as babies .... and are complete e-tards.
anyhow feel free to keep trying to say gallente is fine and i will be there to tell you that you are wrong and a moron and prove it to you in a variety of diffrent ways. Gallente is broken as a race in this game .... BROKEN. and it needs to be fixed.
with that being said i applaud the efforts of anyone attempting to pvp in gang scenario's with a majority of gallente ships as it adds much needed diversity to the pvp in this game and shows skill for overcoming the obvious drawbacks of gallente.
You'll notice that all of the ships are using short range guns. Thus, all the Gallente are fighting at brawling range. The Ashimuu could just as easily be replaced Vigilants. We've already gon over why the SFI is there. As far as my claims. All I've done so far is post actual results while you and yours have only been able to say "LOL YOU TROLL" without bringing any actual argument to your side that was anything more than theory crafting. Results > EFTWhoring. However, I applaud your efforts to claim I am wrong by virtue of "LOLTROLL".
Feel free to keep crying troll and we will continue to show results, actual results and not eftcrafting. I'm sure that those who actually play the game will take results over "LOLTROLL"ing.
Gallente is a viable option for fleets. Even armor Gallente. As you can see by our one loss, we are armor tanking them against "OMGWTFOPMINMATAR" and winning. We are catching "nano" fleets by out flying them and out smarting them. Minmatar is not OP. Gallente is not terribad. Terrible players who fly terribly in Gallente are terrible. It's unfortunately that in today's day and age of "I deserve everything", people would rather scream for the game to be made easier than to actually learn to play it on a level above the terrible trolls.
Undock and fly crazy. You never know, you might just cease being terrible. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
76
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 03:41:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jask Avan wrote:I actually don't think Gallente ships are so terrible now. Just the arguments here seem terrible. (I think they're still slightly too niche though.) Such as the last link. Tornadoes that are terribly fit for smaller brawlers suck against smaller brawlers. News at 11.
I enjoy how people will constantly claim one thing and then when presented evidence to the contrary, they will dismiss the evidence saying, "Well of course that, but not so and so." They will continue to do this no matter how much evidence is presented, ad nauseum.
However, I will continue to fly Gallente and continue to present evidence, actual in game proof, that Gallente are good. Eventually, all scenarios will be covered and what will be left are the trolls and their complete lack of actual game experience screaming some other insane gibberish. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
76
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 04:41:00 -
[26] - Quote
Fade Azura wrote: Rambling
And it is folks like you that will keep flying the ships of lemmings, obeying mindlessly what terrible FCs tell them are good fits. Never braving to venture out to true pvp prowess that separates the lemming from the pvper who will win no matter what ships he flies, be it FOTM or whatever terribad ship is being QQd about on the forums.
Dare to be something other than a lemming. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
76
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 05:22:00 -
[27] - Quote
Fade Azura wrote: in the end its looking like your trying to prove you can work with a bad system .... just because you can still ride a bike with a flat tire doesnt make it a good thing!
Except that I am not "trying" to prove my point. I "am" proving my point. Your analogy about the bike is missing the fact that the bike with a flat tire is beating the rest of the bikes. Which would make the bike with the flat tire superior and thus proving my point. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
76
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 06:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jask Avan wrote:Goddammit forums. Short rewrite.
As I said, I think Gallente are almost fine. Shoulda stated that in my first post. Still probably won't see them in blob numbers unless railfits somehow get popular due to blaster range. As for example, Tornadoes fight ships they're designed to be weak against and not fitted to be good against. Just doesn't seem like a good example to me. I'm not arguing against the ships, just the example.
I understand where you are coming from but it's not like we chose that fight for those reasons. We chose it because they were there. We chose all of our fights.... because they were there. We are fighting typical fleets you will find out roaming or gate camping. You can look us up and see we've engaged others and won, though they weren't as nice as those fights.
Your comment makes it sound like my point is invalid because our fleet could of course beat that setup. However, that setup is a typical setup that is being used right now which makes our fleet a good counter for it. It also shows that Gallente are a good race to fly to counter typical fleets being used these days.
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
76
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 18:39:00 -
[29] - Quote
Hungry Eyes wrote:just admit that medium rails need fixing. that's all i ask.
I've never used medium rails, so unlike ever forum ***** on here who feel blasters need to be fixed because of eft numbers, I won't say they do or don't for lack of experience with them. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
76
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 19:58:00 -
[30] - Quote
JusyFrut wrote:gallente and hybrids suck cholo! You should know better then trying to argue with EFT-warriors who have absolutely no clue.
I know, I'm sorry. :( |
|

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
79
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 04:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
Are you fools still going at it in here? I thought this ended a couple months ago... |
|
|
|