|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
CBBOMBERMAN
Dissident Aggressors
Mordus Angels
5
   |
Posted - 2016.03.18 20:30:55 -
[1] - Quote
This is solved very easily.
Cut down on systems you don't use/have no presence.
Done.
No more headaches, no more timers. 
Front lines are meant to be under constant attack.
|
CBBOMBERMAN
Dissident Aggressors
Mordus Angels
8
|
Posted - 2016.03.19 11:15:48 -
[2] - Quote
Got to love this waterfall of tears from the CFC.
Please change the title of the thread from:
"Please reduce the number of SOV timers"
To
"CCP please help me survive the war vs the allies"
|
CBBOMBERMAN
Dissident Aggressors
Mordus Angels
9
|
Posted - 2016.03.20 12:55:40 -
[3] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:
Ignore OP, they haven't accepted that you pick between a job or sov, and you don't get to have both.
lol. Really this is what the crying has come to?
If you cant cover the timezone, switch the timezone to a time where numbers are higher. See, I fix it for you.
Otherwise drop sov on systems you clearly cant defend cos dont have the bodies and concentrate on the ones you can.
EZ
You guys are spreading yourselves too thin and on top of that, you are been attacked by many different entities united to bring you down. That the key too all your troubles. |
CBBOMBERMAN
Dissident Aggressors
Mordus Angels
17
|
Posted - 2016.03.22 07:49:45 -
[4] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Xeno Szenn wrote:You keep saying the attacker should commit and IGÇÖll quote the Mattanis fireside chat last night GÇ£we owe you nothingGÇ¥. So the question has to be raised why does the attacker owe you anything? They don;t ow me anything, but a balanced mechanic would have both sides put something on the table to fight over. That's a basic principle of games. If only one side has a stake in the game then it's becomes completely one sided. As I sad earlier, imagine playing poker against someone who gets to keep their chips regardless while you always have to go all in. They can play to only win or break even, while you have the potential to lose.
You can get your big slugfest when you comeback to defend after reinforcement. So far we have seen a few of this in this war where large battles and super have been used. Other cases like ihubs, cfc has refused to engage. There seems to be a contradiction here dont you think when you want to claim lack of comitment... cfc lost 3 ihubs. Did not bother with comiting to defence.
If you are expecting them to drop supers on you then you are high. In war you fight using your strenght, not your weaknesses for the most part at least. Considering you are 50k coalition you should not be surprised... they are not here to make you have fun but to kill your coalition and maybe they have fun but not you if the can help it. Lets not forget that this has been a cfc strategy for years. Kinda funny when the same strategy is used against you now....i am enjoying the war.
|
CBBOMBERMAN
Dissident Aggressors
Mordus Angels
18
|
Posted - 2016.03.25 16:12:33 -
[5] - Quote
Tiddle Jr wrote:Not sure but if someone decided to hold the territory and consider himself as a land lord later on this would automatically means that someone else would think of to take that territory as well. So here we have this conflict of interests which lead both sides to have a deal or fight. Having limited period of time during which one the territory vulnarable for capture is a complete nonsence. Same thing about that a small gang of rookie ships mounted with single module could 'destabilize' the whole system by opening doors for invaders. This type of sov is a cancer. The disease which tend people to collaborate under 'blue doughnut' or let the land go into someone else hands.
blue donut existed for years way before new sov. New sov is not related at all to the blue donut. Infact the new sov has changed space completely. All you have to do is open veritas sov and see the big difference between north and south. The blue donut only really exist in the north now..
|
|
|
| |
|