| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Myrddin Emiris
Prizm Ventures Ltd.
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 02:58:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Aceonfire Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 02:47:33 Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 02:46:18
Originally by: Frogzuk
Sorry everyone i am not going to do this again,
Wonderful! Maybe the next person will do it with less bias and more accurate information 
*snip* Be nice - hutch
|

NightmareX
Caldari Infinitus Odium Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:02:00 -
[32]
Edited by: NightmareX on 23/02/2007 03:04:45 OMG, jeeeez LV, why be such a smacktards here?. This is a total smack / flame free report from what happend in 0-W today.
GTF out of this channel and smack / flame other places.
And we know why you all from LV are like crybabies now, but don't cry in this channel
Infinitus Odium - We Are The Bringers Of Hatred |

cflux
Caldari FinFleet Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:11:00 -
[33]
Edited by: cflux on 23/02/2007 09:34:56 *snip* be nice and dont use that word again please - hutch
 --
|

SevernBannow
Caldari TBC Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:17:00 -
[34]
Edited by: SevernBannow on 23/02/2007 03:13:34 I would like to point out that MUCH of LV did not smack at all and were very polite, pointing out how much fun everyone was having etc. It really disappoints me that one person can tarnish LV's reputation like that, trust me they were for the most part much more polite in game. Anyway moving on.
About numbers, the killboard has jarbled together what seem to be three different battles. And only parts of them from what I can tell. For instance on its battle summary it only posts one of my losses (the thorax, it doesn't list the celestis from the second match despite it being listed elsewhere in the killboard, but it does list a carrier that was killed in a completely seperate incident...).
I think for the first engagement LV and CA SUPPORT fleets had equal numbers. The deciding factor was the 6 to 8 LV carriers (I think it was 8 and not 6, but I'm not LV so I can't really say). Whatever the exact number, there were a lot of fighters, 10 went on my poor little thorax right away (they warped in on the cruisers/frigs before our bs warped to us, so their first primaries weren't the usual larger stuff). Plus LV had the station right there to bring out more fodder as needed. But really it was the carriers not the rienforcments.
I survived longer into the second engagement for some reason (I think the LV fc might have been calling targets based on distance, and I had mwded a couple km off the gate where the fighting took place). It started rather oddly and in such a way that I don't think the LV fc quite meant for it to go that way. There were ships that were coming out of the station in 0-W that we attacked (killing one before they warped, we were light on tacklers in the second fight) and then we warped to the gate LV were jumping in from and killed a couple there as apparently 5-10 of them were slightly seperated from the rest of their gang. Then a dictor came a good 20 seconds later to the gate and bubbled it and the rest of the LV gang warped back to the gate on us with fighters again. I'm not sure if the fighters were quite so numerous this time around, but the CA fleet was significantly smaller for this fight (about 45-50 in my estimation, some stragglers so its hard to tell) and the LV fleet was just as big as before it seemed.
I'm not complaining about being outnumbered (our fault for not coordinating with goons). Both sides fought very well and the second battle was probably one of the funnest battles I've been in. From what I understand a good number of CA did manage to break free. I'm not sure if they continued to evade LV's attempt to bust their safes, but I do know they killed the pursueing fighters and cost the carrier pilots a bit of isk.
Good fight all, that ends the tale as far as I know it. Anyone have the story relating to the goon killing of the LV carrier?
|

Tobruk
Vengeance of the Fallen Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:18:00 -
[35]
Edited by: Tobruk on 23/02/2007 03:16:04
Originally by: cflux Edited by: cflux on 23/02/2007 03:12:00 Edited by: cflux on 23/02/2007 03:10:27
Originally by: Zae'dra Xanthe
"Talentless Blobs" Way to make your alliance proud. Take a queue from the OP and try not to turn every battle report into a flame war. Those of us unable to participate in the war like to updates that aren't filled with useless smack.
If the OP allready lies like Xirtam before morning coffee, what else the whole thread is than a flamewar? If the OP's post would be even a tad bit close to what actually happened, there would be no need for flames. Currently its just a ****ty coverup.
Now they are sending their dogs and warsmackers to this thread to defend how "accurate" this report is.
Originally by: NightmareX Edited by: NightmareX on 23/02/2007 03:04:45 OMG, jeeeez LV, why be such a smacktards here?. This is a total smack / flame free report from what happend in 0-W today.
GTF out of this channel and smack / flame other places.
And we know why you all from LV are like crybabies now, but don't cry in this channel
Infact, why do you out of all people appear in every damn thread? iirc you where that guy from M.corp who wanted to join ATUK so badly and ended up baited and killed due utter retardness a year ago?
I wonder if Infod guys have seen that thread, since its absolutely hilarious. Just wondering have you told them about your good old history?
Since, knowing your past actions, I would stay very, very silent. Anycase, the OP's "battlereport" is fully biased, and hardly flame free.
we didnt get spanked at all. it was agood fight on both sides. I really dont undertand why you feel the need to flame. Both parties did well and both will do well again. If you dont think the OP was incorrect then counter his post with links and facts not with insults and assertions. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------- Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -HornFrog ([email protected]) |

NightmareX
Caldari Infinitus Odium Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:20:00 -
[36]
Edited by: NightmareX on 23/02/2007 03:19:51
Originally by: NightmareX Edited by: NightmareX on 23/02/2007 03:04:45 OMG, jeeeez LV, why be such a smacktards here?. This is a total smack / flame free report from what happend in 0-W today.
GTF out of this channel and smack / flame other places.
And we know why you all from LV are like crybabies now, but don't cry in this channel
Infact, why do you out of all people appear in every damn thread? iirc you where that guy from M.corp who wanted to join ATUK so badly and ended up baited and killed due utter retardness a year ago?
I wonder if Infod guys have seen that thread, since its absolutely hilarious. Just wondering have you told them about your good old history?
Since, knowing your past actions, I would stay very, very silent. Anycase, the OP's "battlereport" is fully biased, and hardly flame free.
And who the **** cares about something that happened over a year ago?. And that thing about me in M. Corp just showed what kind of peoples that are in LV, like you.
Yeah everybody in INFOD, and most of the peoples in CA know about the topic i made about that, and guess what they are saying about it LOL? You probably don't want to know that
And yeah, i'm still npcing here in INFOD, and do i get killed for it? LOL nah, why should they kill me for that?
The fact is that M. Corp does have a bunch of noob directors / CEOs who couldn't handle a single npcer. That only shows how good M. Corp / LV is
Infinitus Odium - We Are The Bringers Of Hatred |

NightmareX
Caldari Infinitus Odium Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:22:00 -
[37]
Edited by: NightmareX on 23/02/2007 03:19:00 Ops, double post
Infinitus Odium - We Are The Bringers Of Hatred |

cflux
Caldari FinFleet Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:22:00 -
[38]
Edited by: cflux on 23/02/2007 09:35:29 If you would honestly want discussion about the battle, you would not do an battlereport that is filled with inaccuracy, lies and bias to begin with.
yay for moderation! --
|

Severn Bannow
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:24:00 -
[39]
Edited by: Severn Bannow on 23/02/2007 03:21:12 Edit: Wrong char
|

SevernBannow
Caldari TBC Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:25:00 -
[40]
I love you to.
|

NightmareX
Caldari Infinitus Odium Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:27:00 -
[41]
Edited by: NightmareX on 23/02/2007 04:18:24
Originally by: Tobruk (and dear nightmareX, I ofcourse ment the utter crap you posted on LV forums, not into EVE-O and CA taking you among it ranks tells more about them than us. Any new ubah fits for CNR? :D)
So what?, i just told everybody that i wanted to leave LV on the LV forum, anything wrong with that?, and why i wanted to leave. I was plain honest there why i wanted to leave.
And if i have a CNR now, so what?, well i can say i don't have a CNR now. But i have another faction ship. And yeah i have tons of faction stuffs on it to.
You want to know my setup to ?
We in INFOD love faction bs'es, so we are talking alot about faction bs'es and that in corp chat. It's just fun.
Anyways, back on topic please.
Infinitus Odium - We Are The Bringers Of Hatred |

Tobruk
Vengeance of the Fallen Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:29:00 -
[42]
Originally by: cflux
Originally by: Tobruk
we didnt get spanked at all. it was agood fight on both sides. I really dont undertand why you feel the need to flame. Both parties did well and both will do well again. If you dont think the OP was incorrect then counter his post with links and facts not with insults and assertions. Thank you.
Oh, now you play the "I'm hollier than you" card. How about a local chatlog of your glorius leader Xirtamvotf spamming smack in local with capital letters after the fighting had ceased and other nice things done. If you wan't to post propaganda, don't try to drag us into correcting it, since for one thing is sure, CA lies anyway.
you want't to smack in Local thats one thing, its between 2 warring parites and worth a laugh most of the time. But smacking here makes you look bad TBH and takes away from what could be a constructive thread that gives both sides perspective. ---------------------------------------------- Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -HornFrog ([email protected]) |

Xeno Metamorph
Gallente Acerbus Vindictum
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:39:00 -
[43]
oh god my eyes..
The worst part is, you both give as good as you get. Simple answer is, LV quit complaining "omg its innacurate and biased" Compose yourselves, let the adrenaline leave... and write, 'that isn't accurate, here is what happened from our perspective...'
Its almost impossible for you to write an entirely accurate report when your on the front lines other than from your own perspective. Get someone in LV to writeup and let the community decide the real turn of events, dont just smack, back it up too!
Xeno
|

Touk
Shinra Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 03:55:00 -
[44]
Originally by: SevernBannow Edited by: SevernBannow on 23/02/2007 03:13:34 I would like to point out that MUCH of LV did not smack at all and were very polite, pointing out how much fun everyone was having etc. It really disappoints me that one person can tarnish LV's reputation like that, trust me they were for the most part much more polite in game. Anyway moving on.
About numbers, the killboard has jarbled together what seem to be three different battles. And only parts of them from what I can tell. For instance on its battle summary it only posts one of my losses (the thorax, it doesn't list the celestis from the second match despite it being listed elsewhere in the killboard, but it does list a carrier that was killed in a completely seperate incident...).
I think for the first engagement LV and CA SUPPORT fleets had equal numbers. The deciding factor was the 6 to 8 LV carriers (I think it was 8 and not 6, but I'm not LV so I can't really say). Whatever the exact number, there were a lot of fighters, 10 went on my poor little thorax right away (they warped in on the cruisers/frigs before our bs warped to us, so their first primaries weren't the usual larger stuff). Plus LV had the station right there to bring out more fodder as needed. But really it was the carriers not the rienforcments.
I survived longer into the second engagement for some reason (I think the LV fc might have been calling targets based on distance, and I had mwded a couple km off the gate where the fighting took place). It started rather oddly and in such a way that I don't think the LV fc quite meant for it to go that way. There were ships that were coming out of the station in 0-W that we attacked (killing one before they warped, we were light on tacklers in the second fight) and then we warped to the gate LV were jumping in from and killed a couple there as apparently 5-10 of them were slightly seperated from the rest of their gang. Then a dictor came a good 20 seconds later to the gate and bubbled it and the rest of the LV gang warped back to the gate on us with fighters again. I'm not sure if the fighters were quite so numerous this time around, but the CA fleet was significantly smaller for this fight (about 45-50 in my estimation, some stragglers so its hard to tell) and the LV fleet was just as big as before it seemed.
I'm not complaining about being outnumbered (our fault for not coordinating with goons). Both sides fought very well and the second battle was probably one of the funnest battles I've been in. From what I understand a good number of CA did manage to break free. I'm not sure if they continued to evade LV's attempt to bust their safes, but I do know they killed the pursueing fighters and cost the carrier pilots a bit of isk.
Good fight all, that ends the tale as far as I know it. Anyone have the story relating to the goon killing of the LV carrier?
this is what the OP's post should have been like, i personally don't expect a CA member to be unbiased, their CA so ofcourse they're gonna spin it in their favor (internationally or not) just as an LV member would.
Its plain fact, people spin stories to suit thier side, its extremely hard to be completely unbiased even when your not one of the warring factions.
I'm for LV, he's for CA....alls cool.
what makes it different and a better read is that any biased in the post is speculative, it could be true it could not. Personally i think thats about as unbiased as you can get when your actively involved in the fight so for that i congratulate you.
oh also, all you people saying "Look one LV member smacked us on the forums that must mean LV are all smacktards"
since when does one person represent and entire alliance?
ill happily admit to smacking in game from time to time but i very rarely do it on the forums, and its the same with alot of LV members, they may smack in game once in a while but no more than any other alliance member.
FreeHugs |

Heldane
Amarr 1st Praetorian Guard Vigilia Valeria
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 04:29:00 -
[45]
Let LV have their smack. It appears thats really all they have left.
|

Euripides Das
House Of Troy
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 05:01:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Princess Minnie Edited by: Princess Minnie on 23/02/2007 02:43:52 Looking at the Curse alliance killboard, Curse + allies outnumbered LV, had a lot more BS's then LV and took a lot more losses ship wise, and a severe amount of more losses isk wise.
Also why dont you wait till after the fight to post about it? now if someone makes a new post with all the details mods will lock it because there is already a post on that topic. And if someone does a good write up it will be buried deep in the pages of this thread and no one will get to read it.
So by posting speculative stuff way to early, you have gotten your some of your "facts" wrong, your opinions seem to be wrong (based on your killboards) and you prevent a decent write up from this battle being seen by anyone.
Yeah GG Froggy!
edit: stupid alts, why are they always selected as default characters on the forums? Main is Mr Mozzie
As far as I care there's only one question. Did Curse Alliance acheive what they set out to do? Unless the losses from this battle will put CA out of the war (unlikely) who lost more ships is IRRELEVANT. There is only one question, how many POS's did they manage to put into reinforced and what's going to happen when they come out and it's time to finish the job.
|

Skrypt
Shinra Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 05:06:00 -
[47]
Maybe I missed something but from the engagements I was involved in in 0-w today... you were spanked horribly on 2 occasions. The first being outside the station where LV held the field. Then you tried to pincer us between a 30man gang and a 60 man gang. Our FC did some amazing work maneuvering the fleet and splitting yours up and then reengaging you in 0-w on the 5j4 gate and again, spanking you and being left with the field. But hey... maybe different fights or something. ----------
"I know. I know you can fight. But it's our wits that make us men." ~ Malcolm Wallace (Braveheart) |

Jovius Marginus
Black Avatar Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 05:48:00 -
[48]
Originally by: cflux Edited by: cflux on 23/02/2007 03:12:00 Edited by: cflux on 23/02/2007 03:10:27
Originally by: Zae'dra Xanthe
"Talentless Blobs" Way to make your alliance proud. Take a queue from the OP and try not to turn every battle report into a flame war. Those of us unable to participate in the war like to updates that aren't filled with useless smack.
If the OP allready lies like Xirtam before morning coffee, what else the whole thread is than a flamewar? If the OP's post would be even a tad bit close to what actually happened, there would be no need for flames. Currently its just a ****ty coverup.
Now they are sending their dogs and warsmackers to this thread to defend how "accurate" this report is.
Originally by: NightmareX Edited by: NightmareX on 23/02/2007 03:04:45 OMG, jeeeez LV, why be such a smacktards here?. This is a total smack / flame free report from what happend in 0-W today.
GTF out of this channel and smack / flame other places.
And we know why you all from LV are like crybabies now, but don't cry in this channel
Infact, why do you out of all people appear in every damn thread? iirc you where that guy from M.corp who wanted to join ATUK so badly and ended up baited and killed due utter retardness a year ago?
I wonder if Infod guys have seen that thread, since its absolutely hilarious. Just wondering have you told them about your good old history?
Since, knowing your past actions, I would stay very, very silent. Anycase, the OP's "battlereport" is fully biased, and hardly flame free.
Not supporting either side. Just a good laugh for those PVPers in any alliance. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=316048
|

Aceonfire
Caldari JuBa Corp Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 06:25:00 -
[49]
Just an update, 2 CA dreads and large amount of CA support down, attempting to attack a LV large pos in 0-W
Good fight guys.
|

Seznid
Battlestars Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 06:31:00 -
[50]
I was only there for the station attempt - Impressed with your setup, good fun! Looking forward to the next one
|

DREDD
Battlestars Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 06:47:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Aceonfire Just an update, 2 CA dreads and large amount of CA support down, attempting to attack a LV large pos in 0-W
Good fight guys.
Confirmed, have to admit the setup of the POS was impressive. Good fight, I was one of the lucky CAP pilots to get out. Lesson learned, won't happen again. Was under the impression it was a small POS, realized after warp in we didn't have the fire power or the support to take it out. We would of all gotten out sooner but we were in reinforced mode.
Hands down, LV it was your fight on that one, but by NO means is this war over & we guarantee you will lose the system.
|

Swift Wind
6rasshopper Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 07:09:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Aceonfire Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 01:49:33 Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 01:48:21 Lots of things left out of the writeup.
You had more BS's than we did. I'm still going over the numbers, but I'm guessing it was probably 20+ more.
The battle lasted for nearly 45 minutes, and LV held the field after both engagments.
We recieved intel that the talentless blobs were on their way, and our FC, who was absolutely brilliant, just simply outsmarted the blob, which led to a 2nd arse whooping on the 5J4K gate.
GF though, was a great deal of fun.
(sorry LV, I know, I know, I need to work on my sublty)
Question: Does a ''blobs'' talent level make it hurt less?
Just curious
:)
BoC you've done it now, even the carebears are gunnin' for you... |

Aceonfire
Caldari JuBa Corp Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 07:28:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Swift Wind
Originally by: Aceonfire Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 01:49:33 Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 01:48:21 Lots of things left out of the writeup.
You had more BS's than we did. I'm still going over the numbers, but I'm guessing it was probably 20+ more.
The battle lasted for nearly 45 minutes, and LV held the field after both engagments.
We recieved intel that the talentless blobs were on their way, and our FC, who was absolutely brilliant, just simply outsmarted the blob, which led to a 2nd arse whooping on the 5J4K gate.
GF though, was a great deal of fun.
(sorry LV, I know, I know, I need to work on my sublty)
Question: Does a ''blobs'' talent level make it hurt less?
Just curious
:)
Actually it does. I would rather lose a battle to 50 skilled pilots, than to 300 noobs who are there to just fill resouces on the server.
We may lose the system, we may not.
We all know the only way CA will do this, will be riding on the backs of 300 t1 frigate pilots or 5+ alliances doing the job for them.
As of right now, every attempt by CA to siege the system has resulted in the destruction of their pos's or cap ships.
|

Skrypt
Shinra Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 07:46:00 -
[54]
Edited by: Skrypt on 23/02/2007 07:42:47 LV's will & morale are broken.
How will we ever recover. ----------
"I know. I know you can fight. But it's our wits that make us men." ~ Malcolm Wallace (Braveheart) |

Nostic
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 08:01:00 -
[55]
Posting with an unidentified character in this forum is prohibited, if you wish to participate in the discussions here, be sure to have your corporation and or alliance status ticked in your forum settings. - Huitzilopochtli Tlaloc ([email protected])
|

Kam SingDu'k
Singularity.
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 08:04:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Aceonfire Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 02:04:07 Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 02:02:59
Originally by: Zae'dra Xanthe
Originally by: Aceonfire Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 01:49:33 Edited by: Aceonfire on 23/02/2007 01:48:21 Lots of things left out of the writeup.
You had more BS's than we did. I'm still going over the numbers, but I'm guessing it was probably 20+ more.
The battle lasted for nearly 45 minutes, and LV held the field after both engagments.
We recieved intel that the talentless blobs were on their way, and our FC, who was absolutely brilliant, just simply outsmarted the blob, which led to a 2nd arse whooping on the 5J4K gate.
GF though, was a great deal of fun.
(sorry LV, I know, I know, I need to work on my sublty)
"Talentless Blobs" Way to make your alliance proud. Take a queue from the OP and try not to turn every battle report into a flame war. Those of us unable to participate in the war like to updates that aren't filled with useless smack.
Honstely that wasnt smack. When 100+ t1 frigates with 10 day old chars. get involved in a large fleet engagment, what would you call it?
And try posting with your main, the real smack was being posted by the CA member a few posts up, but I suppose you conviently missed that.
Quote: I will be happy to loose my destroyer for a few battle ships
If my corps cost anything I'll be happy to trade it for Titan
Question: How much is it costing you to move in with BOB? (swallows pride)
Just in case you missed it.
And P.S.
Thats not a battle report, its called damage control.
Please LV, I'm sure this player must be rare in LV, because if not i fear for your sanity.
Calling 100 t1 frigates talentless blobs as not smack? get your head checked please. (bear in mind you just shot yourself on the foot with that comment, remember when this 'talentless blob' took your capital system? like 24 hours ago?)
And damage control? As an outsider i dont see it, the op talks about heavy losses on both sides, and them retreating because of the LV reforming. What I do see is someone with a vested interest (you) trying to lay the smack down on a maybe inaccurate but frankly unbiased report- and failing miserably.
And no, we dont want you to write a report on the battle when you start calling the opposition talentles, and arse whoopings.
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed dimensions of 400x120 pixels and filesize of 24000 bytes -Taiatia (mods@ccpgames) |

Skrypt
Shinra Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 08:18:00 -
[57]
Aceonfire is LV's finest FC. T1 frigates just insure his survivability. 
*snip* This is basicly a simple killboard which isnt allowed - hutch
The POS nabbed lots of the KMs but they'll be posted shortly. All losses are posted at least so I guess it only gets better. :P ----------
"I know. I know you can fight. But it's our wits that make us men." ~ Malcolm Wallace (Braveheart) |

TechnoMag
Minmatar Delta team Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 08:40:00 -
[58]
Edited by: TechnoMag on 23/02/2007 08:44:38
Originally by: Frogzuk Edited by: Frogzuk on 23/02/2007 01:18:13 Edited by: Frogzuk on 23/02/2007 01:17:29 Major fleet engagements taking place in LV Space in and around 0-W the last few hours, loses stufferred on both sides.
CA entered with goal to destroy LV poses in system, 3/4 poses have been put into reinforce mode. LV warp in heavy fleet and undocked from 0-W station to counter CA actions.
3/4 pos'es put in reinforce ...lol u r kidding u say here with 20-30 bs's u put in reinforce so many towers in a hour??? LIES!
Originally by: Frogzuk A large skirmish took place with significant loses, with LV probably taking heavier damages/loses during the first encounter. It became clear that LV were redocking to bring new ships into the battle. CA forces retreated to 1v to regroup and restock.
Check LV killboard mate.... i tell u all the losses are there (BS's loss at least) and i say so because if u dont post the killboard u r not reimburse from loot gained. Yeah of course suport ships who died took another ship from station. I lost a frigate i docked and survived after in a ceptor. And btw CA was the fleet who launched drones away to crash the system... we had only about 30 fighters.
Originally by: Frogzuk CA forces moved back into 0-W to engage LV forces again, LV were not around system at this time. CA forces moved to gate on intel of incoming LV forces. The CA force was outnumbered considerably by LV forces in both engagements with LV bringing 8 (corrected from 6) carriers into the battle whilst no CA capitals were deployed.
LV fleet was one system away chasing another fleet of goons who u cried after them to help u from 77s. Check your numbers on the fleet pls ... we was mostly 65 with carier's and coverts included. Cariers was only 3 or 4 not 8 (maybe if u saw more on scaner its because there r always some cariers floating around pos's afk). Both of your gangs was over 80 people but yeah that means for u r outgunned ... in your view a fair fight is at least 4:1 numbers.
All your battle report its only LIES LIES LIES. Anyone who want too see the truth check the LV killboard, because CA killboard involves only CA killmails and there was tons of goons or other swarm coalition members. Smack how many u want from now on on this thread, u lost 2 fleets here with more numbers than us. Good job Xirtam .... tonight bring another fleet but at least be reasonable and dont bring 500 to crash the system.
About the lag yes its was awfull even for 80vs 70 people... i docked in arround 6minutes and i undocked after another 4 minutes. Already petition my frigate lost because i jumped and set the dock command from md- when the fight was started and my ship didnt docked and i was killed. Its not about money or ship its about CCP services ... right now i see we cant even have a small fleet battle with maximum 150 people involved and 2 years ago such engagements with those numbers was aprox. lag free or at least after the grid load u was abble to fight very well.
|

herasin
Black Omega Security Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 09:03:00 -
[59]
i cant believe you LV we post a thread to tell people we had a top fight with you which we admit you came out on top and you still flame and beat your little drum grow up you little *****
|

Pesadel0
Vagabundos
|
Posted - 2007.02.23 09:18:00 -
[60]
Lol at the LV's ,the OP tried to make a report and he got smacked to hell.
And if "talentless" frigs are taking your stations one after another i fear(for your sake) when they get in BS.
  
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |