| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Skelator
   |
Posted - 2003.12.20 01:43:00 -
[91]
 Quote:
Why in the h3ll did they go to showing every1's employment history to the whole world? Why is it any1s business what corps i've been in the past?
I think this is total BS. CCP should remove this immediately. In rl life it would be an invasion of privacy. Well, they are supposed to give the game a feel of realness.. this is not real at all.
Mercy Killer
T0R
Cant steal and scam new corp now huh???
Cry me a River...
They have us Surrounded again.. the Poor Bastards |
Jash Illian
|
Posted - 2003.12.20 01:50:00 -
[92]
Quote:
Quote:
So the fact that it:
1) Is annoying
and
2) Offers no real security
Haha. You're definition of "fact" is as fuzzy as your definition of "privacy."
The fact that you find this feature annoying is not an attribute of the feature, it's an attribute of you and your opinions and preconceptions about the feature. So, the only "fact" here is that "Jash Ilian is annoyed by this feature."
Last time I checked, that didn't warrant being eliminated.
As for "offering no real security," well, who said it did? It offers exactly what it says it offers: an "employment history."
Seems to me like it functions perfectly.
Keep trying though, these arguments are fun to see through - mostly because of how transparent they are.
If there's no merit in the argument, I'd be the only person stating such an opinion. But I'm not the only person.
What I do see to be transparent are several attempts by you to bait me into attacking you. What I believe to be transparent is the attempt to minimize opposition to the employment history so that what you like doesn't get restricted in some manner.
Some of the more trustworthy members of the community have changed corporations multiple times.
Most of the least trustworthy members of the community only changed corporations once:
From the starter corp to the corp they ripped off.
I mean its like you want corporations to oblige each other like its sex or something. Pffft I would rather **** my enemy.- Rohann
Be careful out there. That other guy waiting in the queue for the gate MIGHT be a baby-munching frock-burner, YOU JUST DON'T KNOW!- Lallante |
Veruna Caseti
|
Posted - 2003.12.20 04:37:00 -
[93]
Quote:
If there's no merit in the argument, I'd be the only person stating such an opinion. But I'm not the only person.
Look at the thread... you are in a minority. A vocal minority, but a minority nonetheless.
Quote:
Some of the more trustworthy members of the community have changed corporations multiple times.
Most of the least trustworthy members of the community only changed corporations once:
Well if you are smart enough to come to this conclusion, what makes you think the CEO and Corporation considering recruiting someone won't come to the same? You are assuming (rather inaccurately) that people will jump to conclusions based on employment history alone. It is merely one piece, a single tool that CEOs can use in conjunction with many other things, and their own discretion, in making decisions about people who are interested in joining their corporations.
Any CEO or Corporation who judges someone immediately trustworthy or not based on employment history alone would be making a foolhardy mistake -- but it's their mistake to make. The information is there to serve a purpose, and it serves it perfectly well whether you like it being available or not.
Veruna Caseti
Ishukone |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |