| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Linium
Without Reason FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.26 22:44:00 -
[1]
BS shouldn't be able to fly @ 10000m/s FULL STOP, well not unless everything else can fly at 50000m/s. ----------------------------------------------------
|

Linium
Without Reason FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.26 23:19:00 -
[2]
The OP requested no idiots to post.
How do you adapt? nothng can catch them except other nano BS. CCP have already stated that BS isn't supposed to go at 10k m/s. Its impossible to try solo your bs VS a nano bs. You just can't hit them, drones won't catch them and your nos only counters theirs and does nothing to slow them down. Intys should be the fastest ships not BS, no arguing with that. Only mistakes, lag or CTD will kill a savvy nano bs pilot and NOT legitimate combat tactics. ----------------------------------------------------
|

Linium
Without Reason FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.27 17:16:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 "The OP requested no idiots to post.
How do you adapt? nothng can catch them except other nano BS."
right but it is okay that the only thing that can catch a tricked out inty is another inty? I mean your lame arguement comes down to the same thing. there is bound to be one ship that is the fastest and the only way to catch that ship will be to fly that ship. Why is it that it should be any different for a nano BS?
Look every arguement is lame I have seen. It is all about you don;t want to have to fly a nanoBS to beat one. I see a bunch of spoiled players who are used to having there 1 set up wins all ships and you don;t want to have to alter that to handle a specialized ship. I mean lets be honest, how the hell is a inty blocking the warp droves of a BS? How the hell are frigates and inty's able to not get pwned by a battleship with immensly more fire power? Why are BS supposed to be the one ship able to get pwned by everything and pwn nothing but other BS...
It would be a shame if CCP caved to this silly nerf whine. There is a penalty for Nano's they don;t need a stackign penalty. The only thing I could see being reasonable is maybe alter nano mods so they might lower inertia so they are a little more easier to web. Honestly though, scramblers and webbers themselves work to well already. they are essentially 100% activatables, and msot of this whining is because finally there is a ship you cvannot be assured to web with certainty.
tip to web a NANO bs you need to be moving fast with it and web.... it will slow down some and you won;t making it unable to get away, but I know that requires special set up and actually piloting your ship isntead of sitting there tapping IWIN buttons.....
I understand the principle of catching a nano bs, it is very easy for ANY ceptor to catch a nano crow or crusader, just get within 10km and stick a web on him. Even if your stilleto or ranis is slower it is still possible catch them due to skills and tactics. My corp mate makes a living out of killing standard missle nano fit crows. It is not possible to do the same to a nano bs however as multiple posters have indicated. Even if a huggy could web a bs to a stop its still not right that only one race, let alone just recons in that race can. Nano BS are a step too far, unsetting the balance between the races and ship classes to sometimes an un-winable level. I only ever ask for a chance to be able to win any battle, this situation is however only winable using another nano bs. ----------------------------------------------------
|
| |
|