Amarr acts of agression against Minmatar are well known. But they happened about 700-800 years ago, and I don't think there is any Amarr from that time is still alive to be accounted for it.

Modern Amarr Empire doesn't conduct acts of aggression. Their current doctrine allows enslaving of only criminals and prisoners of war. (There was though an act of agression that I greatly respect, but it was done not by the Empire itself, but by one of the Heirs without approval and it has ended in the failure, unfortunately.)

She probably feels that they are justified in those operations. Also, thank you for your intervention in those matters.

You can imagine and empathize whatever you want but I'm sure if I break your arm, in reality it will hurt much more than in your imagination.

and may be somewhat childish in itself.

The unacceptable kind. I'll leave it to you to figure out where you draw the line. I've drawn mine.

"Slave" after all, in the Empire is a spectrum that can encompass at one end some poor bastard mining salt with their fingernails and being lashed seven ways to half-dead in lieu of breakfast, and at the other end a tutor educating a new generation of Heirs in etiquette and diplomacy, who dines and lives just as well as the masters of the Holding.

The caldari one is a weird one to talk about. You serve a company and lose all honour and respect if you disavow it, But it is so enshrined in the culture and attitudes of the people that it is the way of life, And it has made them a very powerful people, They are one of the smallest empires but are capable of holding their own against bigger entities.

Why is there the concern about free people arguing about slaves? Because from the perspective of a slave it is yet one more person trying to use us. The free people who engage in these discussions have a tendency to treat slaves as a cause for their own benefit, using the emancipation or support or comparison to them as a way to prove to others of their own "noble character" (or ignoble, as in the case of those who talk about killing slaves to make themselves seem so evil and ruthless), or as a subject on whom or through to push their own ideological beliefs ("everyone is a slave, really!" or "freedom!" or, yes, "amarr victor"). You see that here, with this thread, someone making a big showing about their releasing of their slaves in the hopes of convincing people (or even convincing himself) of the rightness of his new beliefs. Slaves are pawns. When a free person is speaking to or about us, we expect that it is because they want something from us, because they have a need of us. Actually helping us for our own benefit? Really caring? That is what is hard to believe. Other slaves, then, become the only ones we feel can speak with a level of real empathy and understanding. Of course that is also not entirely true, as slaves use each other as much as free people do..