| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.02 11:30:00 -
[1]
I am against the existence of this thread tbh but the "oh it doesnt matter you suck but we are busy elsewhere" posts by CA guys sort of exhonerate it retrospectively.
I would like to say though that AWAR thinks people who want to see info can look for our (better than this thread implies btw ) stats for themselves and dont need to be told in a thread. Putukas of course heads a separate sovereign entity within our alliance and has the right to decide for himself.
Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.02 11:34:00 -
[2]
Originally by: soulkiller3 I like how cow started this war one day after our main fleet moves out of GW. Well done at ganking our carebears, they may learn to be more carefull. I came back once to fight Cow, 30 jumps to camp 10 nanobattles ships in a empire station. Your in GW to try and wast time from us fighting LV, its not going to work.
Hum Hum cow started this war the day you formed and before the Mega war started... I explained then that the very birth of your alliance was an abomination that would be punished... well it has been, dont you agree?
Anyway I am ducking out of this thread since I disapprove of it o/ Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.02 11:48:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Crellion on 02/03/2007 11:45:19 And these last three posts demonstrate why there is no point in this thread. They will never own up. There is no point treating them like NBSI or MC or RA or anyother serious war enemy of the past. There is a propaganda line with 2000 members repeating the same stuff.
There are KBs and videos of fleetbattles let those things do our talking AWAR pls stay away from this thread. TY
(ps Putukas as I said you are a leader of your people and your choices are respected and your own. I am merely talkign for awar) Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.02 16:29:00 -
[4]
Originally by: NightmareX because it shows that you ONLY care about killmails.
and there I was thinking that you were the most clueless of your entire alliance and we would never agree on anything. How wrong I was... Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.02 21:50:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Tassi
Originally by: Pepperami
As for achievements, I think we've each done more than our part in the past, probably more than most of the new CA. and I am much more proud of my 200 people taking on a challenge than bandwagoning with god knows how many, but hey, diversity is the spice of life.
1 or 2 months ago a little pact of corporations managed to put so much pressure on Imperium Alliance/Foundation (the Official claimers of the GW) that little Xirty had to pull in Red Alliance and the Alcohol Alliance to stop this little pact from claiming parts of the Great Wildlands.
This little pact of corporations has achieved more than your whole "PvP godlike superman Alliance" my friend. Beat this and you will earn your so desired respect.
Is that the same little pact that then joined Imp and RA and IAC and and and ... and now they are all together getting spankage?
Anyway nm... Tassi dont pretend to be an observer and stuff. You have been in Infod for ages. Ok cool. You think they are teh uber. Ok
Now contribute something relevant to the thread (which should allready have been locked by now tbh) and stop explaining how CoW might spank CA but Infod who are in CA could spank CoW with their hands behind their backs  
After all we were all in -v- once sharing one killboard with the same stats and I dont remember such glorious acheievements from you personally or Infod at the time. You were good but just that and nowhere near the top of the boards ... awar and EE on the other hand... Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.02 21:56:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Siobhan Ni The only corp in COW that deserves respect is EE. They stayed in GW and fought along side INFOD and what was left of V and stay true to their word. The other corps? We asked them to help V in GW and they wouldn't come, and when they did it was too late.
And like Tassi pointed out, post here again when you pose a big enough threat that you can hurt those living in GW so much that they need to call help from other alliances and call in a capital fleet.
I don't mean to flame here, but it's gonna take more than a few ganks to hurt CA. Your arguments now sound a lot like the arguments that IMP used when the main V pvp fleet left GW to fight in scalding pass 
You little troll you forget who kept you safe and allowed you to npc for your little iskies when we were still in -v-. Because we left and what was left (apart from EE, SERA and precious few others we agree in that) was a bunch of carebears that basically dragged -v-'s name through the mud, you dare turn and accuse us? and say we "do not deserve respect".
You ungrateful little nothing you would have never seen the inside of 1v- station if it wasnt for us... you forget that month upon month upon month we consistently topped the -v- boards defending your little sorry behind. Now you move on to another fine corp (Outbreak) way above your personal station and you make them also look bad by posting drivel here...
Pffft the eve-o forums where people with out wee wees pown all. Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.02 22:32:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Siobhan Ni Edited by: Siobhan Ni on 02/03/2007 22:17:11
Originally by: Crellion
Originally by: Siobhan Ni The only corp in COW that deserves respect is EE. They stayed in GW and fought along side INFOD and what was left of V and stay true to their word. The other corps? We asked them to help V in GW and they wouldn't come, and when they did it was too late.
And like Tassi pointed out, post here again when you pose a big enough threat that you can hurt those living in GW so much that they need to call help from other alliances and call in a capital fleet.
I don't mean to flame here, but it's gonna take more than a few ganks to hurt CA. Your arguments now sound a lot like the arguments that IMP used when the main V pvp fleet left GW to fight in scalding pass 
You little troll you forget who kept you safe and allowed you to npc for your little iskies when we were still in -v-. Because we left and what was left (apart from EE, SERA and precious few others we agree in that) was a bunch of carebears that basically dragged -v-'s name through the mud, you dare turn and accuse us? and say we "do not deserve respect".
You ungrateful little nothing you would have never seen the inside of 1v- station if it wasnt for us... you forget that month upon month upon month we consistently topped the -v- boards defending your little sorry behind. Now you move on to another fine corp (Outbreak) way above your personal station and you make them also look bad by posting drivel here...
Pffft the eve-o forums where people with out wee wees pown all.
So one minute INFOD are a respectable pvp corp, next minute they're a bunch of npcers? Make up your mind. Guess I hit a nerve. EE know what we done in GW. Let's leave it at that.
EDIT: The respect part was referring to help V at the end, not your acheivements within V, which I don't question. Like I said, don't mean to flame.
You ask a question here my answer is: I didnt mean Infod as a corp I meant you because your comment would only be possible if you didnt take part in the pvp when you were in -v- ergo you must have been npcing. (though I think I remember you at fleets but I might be wrong). As I said Infod was good. Also they are now the best CA has with BOS... but that says less believe me. Good in old -v- > than best of new CA. Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 02:47:00 -
[8]
Originally by: MaidMarion TBH, as good as you are doing C.O.W., Razor did it better.   
(A) Perhaps then you should look at awar stats 
(B) Razor have greeks too so its only natural  Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.05 13:15:00 -
[9]
Originally by: maihem
Originally by: ramptrick
Originally by: Fedaykinn Heh COW you know that out main bulk of pvpers are in detroit atm engaging LV. We were gonna actually stop for a while and turn back to GW to engage COW and push them back out. But when we did this you guys were all in Nano BS's Bumping single players form the station and then ganking them with abuot 5 different ships. Then when we finally get a gang togeather you guys run back off to Egbinger and it just wastes our time. Wed rather engage an enemy that stands and fights (Like LV) than runs away like you guys. It wasted our pew pew time.
Sure youve had gangs of what 40+ but ATM CA have gangs of 60-100 (sumtimes even more) down in detroit engaging LV. And we know as soon as we bring that fleet back up to GW you will run away again and weve wasted like antoher hour or 2 of our time. Is it no wonder weve decided to not even bother now?
but dont you see!! us wasting your time away from killing our friends LV works for us.. we waste your Pew Pew time against LV to even the odds abit.. 
this is quite honestly the most truthful post on this thread. that's why we can not be bothered to mount any sort of serious campaign against you. it's not because you are uber it's not because we will loose ships and i am not trying to flame you here, but as you said your self, you are a distraction at the moment we can not afford to pay attention to. we are fighting some people now who, if we fail, will wipe the floor with us. so we better not fail and that means not bothering to jump 30 or more (yes the front has moved that far now) jumps to fight..or maybe search in vein for your roving 10 man battle ship gangs. but i do look forward to all that changing cause man your egos are just too much :p
Translation: "You COWs fight our 500 GW residents wiht your 100 people andf kill them all the time but when this war is over if we still have an alliance we will bring 200 man fleets to fight your 30 man fleets. Now 30-60/70 you still win but 30v150 you will lose COWs. We might not actually kill you but we can say you are running away from the fair fights once again 1111"
My comment: go you.
Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |
| |
|