What about the good old Rokh?

Rokh:

8x mining lazor II

medium should booster II, shield boost amplifier II, 2x invuln II, EM amplifier II, heavy cap booster II

2x mining lazor upgrade II, damage control, 2x co-processor II

Sit next to a depot, switch all mining lazors with heavy neutron blaster II, the lazor upgrades with mag-stabs, the co-processors with tracking enhancer II, remove medium shield booster II with 2x x-large ancillery booster and the heavy cap booster with a scram, the em amplifier with a web = win.

If you read my "research" in the 5th post here you would have seen I've already figured out how to beat CODE at their own game regardless of how you, or anyone, else tries to spin it. It's really very simple and I'm not looking for verification of it as you would have others think. But just to be perfectly clear I am not fooled by what you or any of them would say, and you can call this a mental dogma or use w/e other warped language you want, but you compared what I'm preparing to do with just playing by their rules which would only be true if part of their rules is to make them lose and lose badly every time they are met...and if that is the case then I am MORE than fine with that. However, I'm pretty sure no one makes rules for themselves that deliberately set themselves up for such failure, humiliation and loss even if it suits their purposes to make others think they do. Likewise, I actually hope CODE reads this and plans out exactly how many ships they have to lose because of me; the idea that they know they will lose in advance is will make it like losing twice in their minds. The builds I"m looking for will be much cheaper than w/e they need to pop it no matter how much time they have to think about it.

I hope that answers your "concerns" but, if not, keep them to yourself. My one and only question is also very simple and can be found in my first post alone.

So all posters please keep your replies to ship fits that satisfy the conditions of the original post with perhaps the additional stipulations of being under a capital ship and tougher than a barge/exhumer (although I do like the efficiency of the procurer and may go with that in addition to the ultimate answer to my question). I'm looking for ship fits and maybe discussion about how good the fits are for their intended purposes; not philosophical rants or elaborate spread of CODE propaganda.

If i was to set a trap, i would not post it on the forums

If you get ganked, CODE wins.
If you tank your ship and don't get ganked, CODE wins
If you set a trap, CODE wins
If you spend any amount of time trying to figure out how to "beat" CODE, they win.

Getting you to play the game instead of mindlessly mining AFK is their goal, you can't beat CODE, they always win.

OP: The reason no one mentioned the rokh is because it has almost no space for ore( meaning you have to transfer it into something that is very vulnerable OR spend 10 minutes warping back and forth between belt and station every couple of minutes in a sloth)

But if you want BS fits... The scorpion is better than the rokh. More isk is not always better. These are the most unorthodox ridiculous fits i came up with but they are also max tanked.
[Rokh, New Setup 1]
Damage Control II
1600mm Steel Plates II
1600mm Steel Plates II
1600mm Steel Plates II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II

Large Shield Extender II
EM Ward Field II
Thermal Dissipation Field II
Kinetic Deflection Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II

[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]

Large Core Defense Field Extender I
Large Core Defense Field Extender I
Large Core Defense Field Extender I

216k omni tank. 270 mil in jita

[Scorpion, New Setup 1]
Damage Control II
1600mm Steel Plates II
1600mm Steel Plates II
1600mm Steel Plates II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II

Large Shield Extender II
Large Shield Extender II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
EM Ward Field II
Thermal Dissipation Field II
Kinetic Deflection Field II
Large Shield Extender II

[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]

Large Core Defense Field Extender I
Large Core Defense Field Extender I
Large Core Defense Field Extender I

217k omni tank. 230 mil in jita. My procurer fit is still the better bang for the buck as you can lose 5-7 of those to one of these. and they have half the tank, a decent ore hold, and can mine much more efficiently.

thoughts?

If you've got the skills, the Skiff.
Always the Skiff.
Moves like a cruiser, tanks like a battleship, deals out insane drone damage.
Just take some of the fitting suggestions listed earlier in this thread and you should be fine.
Nothing's ungankable, but you can make your boat so much of a pain in the backside that folks will look elsewhere for easier prey.
Now, no amount of tank will fix not being at keys...

[quote=Darthon Zoh]
-snip-
makes me want to jump clone out of null and gank you myself just for lols.

Quoted for relevance. That is, if I was in null and not a pacifist carebear.

Op you are almost as moronic as code. Outsmarting code isn't even an issue, as nothing they do is smart, it's mindless miner ganking. It's not difficult, clever, profitable, or indeed anything worth worrying about. Saying you want to make it difficult and less profitable for them just shows that you don't understand even a tiny bit what they are about. If you want to beat them, jump in a pvp ship and hunt them. They can't handle an actual fight. Ref alliance tournament.

You've been given the right answer many times already, by people who know what they are talking about. No point to any more fittings being posted.

These same people have also tried pointing out to you that you are not on to a winning strategy. That what you are trying to do is pointless. That code doesn't care about profitability of ganks.

Please do tank your mining vessel. I have no sympathy for people who don't and then get blown up. But don't pretend like you're some Eve savant who has masterfully outwitted the witless. You're just yet another sour grapes victim.

Troll.

Welp folks,

Op is absolutely beyond help.
Time to pack your stuff and go give your very good advice to someone who will take it :)

Fly wrecklessly o7

Mic drop and walk off is a lot more effective when you actually go away. *fingers crossed*

I have to assume that posters like you don't really believe what you say and are just attempting to spread propaganda or troll because otherwise the only other option is that you do believe your own drivel and no one can really be that dumb.

To refocus the thread, once again, it is about ship fits guided by the original post. Since now most posters here have avoided the actual question, I'm beginning to think what has been offered so far has exhausted the ideas of the EVE general forum goer and that paints a very dismal picture for the EVE community's general ingenuity (and therefore its intelligence) and activity. But feel free to prove me more right, in all respects, by making more posts not oriented to ship fits. Mic drop.

You're My Boy Friend Joe?

Well this entire thing is silly, but OK I'll play along:

Go with the rokh + depot idea.

Refit with full large smartbombs as code starts warping in (yes you'll need your safety on red and there may be some innocents caught in the crossfire)

nuke them all before they even have time to realize what is happening - get the pods too.

wait for concord if anybody else was near you.

?????

Profit?

This would likely cause concord to aggro to us as well and therefore reduce our insurance payout to zero, would it not? I considered and ECM burst build like this as well but it would also likely cause concord aggro. Keeping the isk costs down well below that of what CODE would be forced to used is key to be both able to claim victory and keep these efforts easily sustainable and the ship insurance is essential to that.

You Must Be ******* Joking

Yes it would, as I said you'd likely have collateral damage, innocents in the crossfire, and concord coming down on you.

On the other hand you might just make some code gankers lose pods they didn't plan to lose - I've seen some pretty juicy ones =P

Can I just ask: is the intention of this to just sit in an asteroid belt doing nothing, on the off chance that code warp in and fly in range so you can discobomb them? If so, you definitely just failed Eve. And you've disappointed your parents.

Actually the OP's intention is to just sit in an asteroid belt doing nothing on the off chance that code warp in and kill him so he can brag that they lost more isk than he did in doing so...

So I think my suggestion was at least a mild improvement.

Can I just ask: is the intention of this to just sit in an asteroid belt doing nothing, on the off chance that code warp in and fly in range so you can discobomb them? If so, you definitely just failed Eve. And you've disappointed your parents.

I'm sorry you have a hard time reading. Might I suggest signing back up for junior high? Seems like you're having trouble understanding EVE. There are much easier games out there that would give you a more gentle time (although not that many). Also the ship fit you suggested will not work.