EVE Search - Privateer Alliance , are thay abusing war dec ?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Privateer Alliance , are thay abusing war dec ?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
SFShootme The Carebear Stare Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.09 08:07:00 - [1] Edited by: SFShootme on 09/03/2007 08:04:04 Let's just start quote'ing shall we? Quote: If you wana attack them and thay see a gang in local and just dock the a station, there is no way to do tham any damage , and we (the 0.0 ppl) need emp (for POS Full and so...) but that don't need 0.0 Ur forgetting about all the wartargets that dock for us..... I yeah, u guys tend to dock way way waaaay more than we do, so far i have not had to dock for a big gang yet.... so yeah. Quote: How does the Privateer Alliance different from pirates? Is there a difference between piracy and pvp in 0.0? Quote: Chances are, they are abusing the process. We see an ongoing pattern of individual corporations leaving, and I'm sure the same thing is happening on the input side, although notification is not given. More false accusations 4tl! A corp cannot war dec somebody and then join a alliance. A corp must drop all their decced wars to be able to join an alliance.... Quote: Where you - the casual player - can see 1 or 2 enemies in empire a seldom time, the privateers see enemies everywhere and all the time!! Including members from way more dangerous alliances! Thank you for pointing that out Quote: If you wana attack them and thay see a gang in local and just dock the a station! And you don't happen to run when u see a privateer gang in local? Quote: Sad to say but empire war dec can be a griefing tool. War dec needs to be meaningful. CCP needs to make war dec expensive especially when it is an alliance war dec. Maybe 1B a week. The war decs go up to 200million isk per week bro, i wouldn't see much of a change there. Quote: Since high-sec, where they are 99% of the time, was meant to be free of piracy, aside from the occasionnal suicide gank, their use of the war-dec system to do just that comes under the heading of deliberate use of flaw in game mechanics, and as such is an exploit. .. \ Oh noes! Haxploits!!!111oneoneoenoene. No but really, use ur brains be4 u start rambling. The war deccing system is made to blow stuff up in empire. And that's what we are using it for. Quote: In that case, it can be said taht they are still below the threshold of pain. If/when they rise above it something will be done, 0.0 alliances will band together, or whatever it takes to force Privateers back below the pain threshold. yah! more targets... Quote: They had 4 guys. FOUR WHOLE GUYS camping the Jita 4 4 lagfest station for two days. If they're at war with any alliance worth mentioning they'd be pwned out of there so fast... Bob, (former) ascn, LV, need i say more? Quote: . Nobody is doing squat about it so too bad. There's no loophole being abused. There's only carebear corps with poor organizational skills getting the smackdown. I ain't afraid of those b-----s and neither should you be, teddy. We do happen to war-dec the more "leet" squads out there bro. And no, we're hardly in war with small stuff since they don't give alot of targets. Quote: thought the exploit was the alliances that declare war and then cancel so they can get the 24 hours of fighting. Or the ones who don't pay the fee but still get that 24 hours of fighting. It takes 24h before a war to go in effect, shame on that accusation bro. Quote: I think there should be some way to stop wartargets from hiding in stations. Thats probably the only thing that is somewhat breaking of the whole concept of war. If they want to wage war thats fine but they shouldn't be able to hide behind an invincible npc barrier either Awsome, that would give me about 50 kills more per day -------- Above is my opinion and not of any 3rd partys and/or the privateer alliance. Tho shall give Life, for Life.
SFShootme The Carebear Stare Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.09 16:34:00 - [2] Quote: They had 4 guys. FOUR WHOLE GUYS camping the Jita 4 4 lagfest station for two days. If they're at war with any alliance worth mentioning they'd be pwned out of there so fast... What would be the use of any more people at 4-4? More splitted loot etc... Pretty pointless if u ask me Tho shall give Life, for Life.
SFShootme The Carebear Stare Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.09 16:34:00 - [3] Quote: They had 4 guys. FOUR WHOLE GUYS camping the Jita 4 4 lagfest station for two days. If they're at war with any alliance worth mentioning they'd be pwned out of there so fast... What would be the use of any more people at 4-4? More splitted loot etc... Pretty pointless if u ask me Tho shall give Life, for Life.
SFShootme The Carebear Stare Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.09 16:35:00 - [4] Edited by: SFShootme on 09/03/2007 16:32:07 doublepost =/ Tho shall give Life, for Life.
SFShootme The Carebear Stare Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.09 16:35:00 - [5] Edited by: SFShootme on 09/03/2007 16:32:07 doublepost =/ Tho shall give Life, for Life.
SFShootme The Carebear Stare Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.10 09:51:00 - [6] Dangerhouse, a corp can just surrender to a war-dec... An alliance cannot Tho shall give Life, for Life.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.