| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
EvilTwin I
Twin Corp
   |
Posted - 2007.03.11 23:29:00 -
[1]
Edited by: EvilTwin I on 11/03/2007 23:25:40
What about:
A Rig that could add 1 more Med/low slot
ofc with a penalty
what do You think ? |
Zeonos
Amarr
venus divine brotherhood
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 00:18:00 -
[2]
would be nice with rigs for more low/mid/high slot and/or torrent/missiles slots
the rigs should cost alot so you cant just plug 3x mid in. might cost 400cali point pr rig.
Join the save Stargate SG1 Campaign Today!
www.savestargatesg1.com
|
Princess MiMi
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 01:14:00 -
[3]
only problem is when a ship already has 8 high/mid/low
maybe have it change a high/mid/low to a low/mid/high in addition to the high calibration
|
jbob2000
Gallente
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 03:23:00 -
[4]
It would throw off the balance for alot of ships.
________________________________
KIA Recruitment |
Tulisin Dragonflame
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 06:11:00 -
[5]
Pretty much makes that rig the best rig in the game 95 % of the time. Want more cap recharge? Why go for a 15 % CCC when you could just grab another lowslot for a 25 % CPR?
|
Rhamnousia
Caldari
Pelennor Swarm
R i s e
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 06:15:00 -
[6]
no no no no and no.
imagine my enyo with 3 mid slots, MWD, warp scrambler and a cap injector ... so yea, there ...
---------------------------------------
- yes, im a noob
- yes, im a nut job
- no, i dont give a .... about what u think of my noobness
- now, tell me sumthing i dont know |
Erim Solfara
Amarr
Tarlos INC
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 10:27:00 -
[7]
It wouldn't change the fitting though, maybe even have a mild penalty to it.
So it could be very hard to squeeze another module onto a ship with an already tight build.
New ship class |
Jonas O'Fall
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 12:06:00 -
[8]
What about rigs that replace a turret slot with a missile slot, or the reverse?
Or one that removes a low and adds a medium?
|
Eleana Tomelac
Gallente
AD VITAM AETERNAM
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 13:58:00 -
[9]
Adding slots kills the balance...
I think moving slots is dangerous too, you'll see many ships adding slots to tank or adding hi slots for more weaponry (or as much weaponry and add a warfare link on a BC maybe).
But...
Adding hardpoints, changing the hardpoint type, allowing you to fit something you couldn't before (a rig to allow 1 warfare link module on a ship, giving the 99% CPU reduction?).
--
Pocket drone carriers (tm) enthousiast !
Flying Vexor and Ishkur, Myrmidon was too slow, got ganked by 3 BC and a Megathron...
|
Tarron Sarek
Gallente
Endica Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.03.12 20:16:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Tarron Sarek on 12/03/2007 20:33:49
 Originally by: Jonas O'Fall
What about rigs that replace a turret slot with a missile slot, or the reverse?
They could call that the 'CNR' or 'CNR+' rig..
Changing slots is dangerous, as has been mentioned already.
Some ideas I had two months ago.
At any rate, only tech 1 ships should be able to get additional slots.
But even then, battleships are a problem.
Perhaps a big CPU/Grig penalty would be sufficient, perhaps not.
I'd like to see an option to add a mid or low slot to tech 1 frigates and cruisers, especially frigs, as they are getting more and more ectinct.
That would be rather limited and not overpowered, but quite arbitrary tbh.
___________________________________
_/_/ Game balance isn't just a luxury _/_/ |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |