EVE Search - Taking the fight to CODE

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Taking the fight to CODE

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Dom Arkaral Bite the pillow 560	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:07:32 - [151] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Well some CO2 players had a war dec on one of the Miniluv medium Citadels, me and a few lads tried to turn up to pick off their neutral logi, however we were late because for some odd reason I just could not log in for about 40 minutes, we got there too late and the only fun I had was enticing the Gankers to try to gank my Proteus which failed, funny part was that I had just told the OGB to drop links and dock so was getting the links back up, but as I was after burning away the thrashers were out of optimal and did not get through shields. Was fun though and the AG chaps appreciated it even though we failed to help the attack on the Citadel. A lot of secondary Miniluv characters went into the corp that owned the Citadel, I have the names somewhere, they actually had a sizeable fleet, but if someone like VMG went for it, they would die in a ball of fire. If mini luv decides to pull in 200 dudes, it'll take a lot more than just VMG to kill them. VMG excel at what they do, but numbers win most of the time There is no counter to that argument. Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r Gù+Nitshe's favorite Gù+Bane of Holeysaltmountain 01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116
Runner Chase BLOODY STEEL 0	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:15:46 - [152] - Quote Dom Arkaral wrote: Runner Chases wrote: I feel like I already read the exact same reply in another post But, good points (too bad you'll get marked as a supporter like Dirty Forum Alt, even though you're not on CODE.'s side) All the organized AG left to have fun elsewhere in game, so all that remains is as organized as a kindergarten class lol IDK I just got back to playing a week ago ? and I already lost an ore freighter, I was slipping and lost my ship in hek . I looked at local and it became obvious I was not the only victom and something about code ? I clicked the link for the blog and read, very interesting. I don't care about being targeted for being anti CODE, Sign me up ! I like to manufacture, but willing to play any role in the resistance .
Dracvlad Taishi Combine Second-Dawn 2231	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:16:57 - [153] - Quote Dom Arkaral wrote: Dracvlad wrote: Well some CO2 players had a war dec on one of the Miniluv medium Citadels, me and a few lads tried to turn up to pick off their neutral logi, however we were late because for some odd reason I just could not log in for about 40 minutes, we got there too late and the only fun I had was enticing the Gankers to try to gank my Proteus which failed, funny part was that I had just told the OGB to drop links and dock so was getting the links back up, but as I was after burning away the thrashers were out of optimal and did not get through shields. Was fun though and the AG chaps appreciated it even though we failed to help the attack on the Citadel. A lot of secondary Miniluv characters went into the corp that owned the Citadel, I have the names somewhere, they actually had a sizeable fleet, but if someone like VMG went for it, they would die in a ball of fire. If mini luv decides to pull in 200 dudes, it'll take a lot more than just VMG to kill them. VMG excel at what they do, but numbers win most of the time There is no counter to that argument. True, it would be like a certain Hard Knocks Citizen event that cost VMG a few losses a couple of months back... When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.
Dom Arkaral Bite the pillow 560	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:27:41 - [154] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: Dom Arkaral wrote: Dracvlad wrote: Well some CO2 players had a war dec on one of the Miniluv medium Citadels, me and a few lads tried to turn up to pick off their neutral logi, however we were late because for some odd reason I just could not log in for about 40 minutes, we got there too late and the only fun I had was enticing the Gankers to try to gank my Proteus which failed, funny part was that I had just told the OGB to drop links and dock so was getting the links back up, but as I was after burning away the thrashers were out of optimal and did not get through shields. Was fun though and the AG chaps appreciated it even though we failed to help the attack on the Citadel. A lot of secondary Miniluv characters went into the corp that owned the Citadel, I have the names somewhere, they actually had a sizeable fleet, but if someone like VMG went for it, they would die in a ball of fire. If mini luv decides to pull in 200 dudes, it'll take a lot more than just VMG to kill them. VMG excel at what they do, but numbers win most of the time There is no counter to that argument. True, it would be like a certain Hard Knocks Citizen event that cost VMG a few losses a couple of months back... Or the massacre 3 months back? CD and idk (90 some dudes) who else went up against 200 guys in t1 ships and nados Isk war was lost that day lol Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r Gù+Nitshe's favorite Gù+Bane of Holeysaltmountain 01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116
Dirty Forum Alt Forum Alts Anonymous 549	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:29:54 - [155] - Quote Runner Chase wrote: Dom Arkaral wrote: Runner Chases wrote: I feel like I already read the exact same reply in another post But, good points (too bad you'll get marked as a supporter like Dirty Forum Alt, even though you're not on CODE.'s side) All the organized AG left to have fun elsewhere in game, so all that remains is as organized as a kindergarten class lol IDK I just got back to playing a week ago ? and I already lost an ore freighter, I was slipping and lost my ship in hek . I looked at local and it became obvious I was not the only victom and something about code ? I clicked the link for the blog and read, very interesting. I don't care about being targeted for being anti CODE, Sign me up ! I like to manufacture, but willing to play any role in the resistance . Ironically he meant the OP would label you as being part of CODE. - not that anyone would label you as anti-CODE. But the OP seems to have given up - or at least fallen asleep. Dracvlad might be able to get you in touch with whatever passes for the organized anti-ganking people these days - I can't, sadly - but good luck o7
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:47:15 - [156] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Runner Chase wrote: Dom Arkaral wrote: Runner Chases wrote: I feel like I already read the exact same reply in another post But, good points (too bad you'll get marked as a supporter like Dirty Forum Alt, even though you're not on CODE.'s side) All the organized AG left to have fun elsewhere in game, so all that remains is as organized as a kindergarten class lol IDK I just got back to playing a week ago ? and I already lost an ore freighter, I was slipping and lost my ship in hek . I looked at local and it became obvious I was not the only victom and something about code ? I clicked the link for the blog and read, very interesting. I don't care about being targeted for being anti CODE, Sign me up ! I like to manufacture, but willing to play any role in the resistance . Ironically he meant the OP would label you as being part of CODE. - not that anyone would label you as anti-CODE. But the OP seems to have given up - or at least fallen asleep. Dracvlad might be able to get you in touch with whatever passes for the organized anti-ganking people these days - I can't, sadly - but good luck o7 Morning CODE Forum Alt, have not given up, there just isn't much to talk about. Current game mechanics protect you and your boyfriends from the EVE community. I don't want ganking nerfed, I don't want bumping nerfted, I dont want CODE nerfed. The changes I would like to see do not prevent CODE from operating how they are now. I want gankers to have to go do some ratting before they can conduct business as usual, I want gankers to not be sheltered in high sec by NPC stations, not full docking restrictions, just partial. In short, I want there to be some consequences for criminal activity in high sec, consequences that put criminals at risk of losing assets other than throw away gank ships. Of course you gankers dont want to fight for your ability to gank
Faylee Freir Facetious Indifference Vendetta Mercenary Group 274	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:49:23 - [157] - Quote I dont officially speak for VMG but i can say that i personally believe that if you blow up a miniluv alt citadel it will have negligable effect since they are easily replaced. I also wanted to talk about the wreck ehp change and others complaining about the "buff to ganking". Popping freighter wrecks was 100% uncounterable and could be done in a cheap Thrasher. You can ask miniluv how 1 person dedicated themselves to popping a ton of miniluv gank wrecks for almost and month and almost bankrupted them. Buffing wreck ehp not only benefitted gankers, but was good for everyone that was interested in looting wrecks. Not only was it beneficial to everyone but its good and proper balance to a mechanic that had no direct counter. HTFU
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.17 20:58:12 - [158] - Quote Faylee Freir wrote: I dont officially speak for VMG but i can say that i personally believe that if you blow up a miniluv alt citadel it will have negligable effect since they are easily replaced. I also wanted to talk about the wreck ehp change and others complaining about the "buff to ganking". Popping freighter wrecks was 100% uncounterable and could be done in a cheap Thrasher. You can ask miniluv how 1 person dedicated themselves to popping a ton of miniluv gank wrecks for almost and month and almost bankrupted them. Buffing wreck ehp not only benefitted gankers, but was good for everyone that was interested in looting wrecks. Not only was it beneficial to everyone but its good and proper balance to a mechanic that had no direct counter. Destroying alt citadels will have no effect, not because they are easily replaced but because there is no reason to replace them, just move all the dog **** to the nearest NPC station, and conduct business as usual. The citadel becomes an asset when one must rat sec status back up to access NPC stations in high sec. I agree with you regarding the wrecks, like I have said before, ganking should be easier, the ehp buffs to ships in the past were a mistake. The problem with ganking is the gankers are often untouchable, there is no consequences for ganking at the moment. The only worry of the ganker is disruption ops. That is what needs to change.
Faylee Freir Facetious Indifference Vendetta Mercenary Group 274	Posted - 2016.08.17 21:08:04 - [159] - Quote Cockchaos wrote: Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Runner Chase wrote: Dom Arkaral wrote: Runner Chases wrote: I feel like I already read the exact same reply in another post But, good points (too bad you'll get marked as a supporter like Dirty Forum Alt, even though you're not on CODE.'s side) All the organized AG left to have fun elsewhere in game, so all that remains is as organized as a kindergarten class lol IDK I just got back to playing a week ago ? and I already lost an ore freighter, I was slipping and lost my ship in hek . I looked at local and it became obvious I was not the only victom and something about code ? I clicked the link for the blog and read, very interesting. I don't care about being targeted for being anti CODE, Sign me up ! I like to manufacture, but willing to play any role in the resistance . Ironically he meant the OP would label you as being part of CODE. - not that anyone would label you as anti-CODE. But the OP seems to have given up - or at least fallen asleep. Dracvlad might be able to get you in touch with whatever passes for the organized anti-ganking people these days - I can't, sadly - but good luck o7 Morning CODE Forum Alt, have not given up, there just isn't much to talk about. Current game mechanics protect you and your boyfriends from the EVE community. I don't want ganking nerfed, I don't want bumping nerfted, I dont want CODE nerfed. The changes I would like to see do not prevent CODE from operating how they are now. I want gankers to have to go do some ratting before they can conduct business as usual, I want gankers to not be sheltered in high sec by NPC stations, not full docking restrictions, just partial. In short, I want there to be some consequences for criminal activity in high sec, consequences that put criminals at risk of losing assets other than throw away gank ships. Of course you gankers dont want to fight for your ability to gank Ganking happened before CCP allowed us to buy tags. While your suggestions would make the activity more of a pain, ganking is an activity thats 100% based on RNG, requires abnormal amounts of dedication and preparation, and relies on players being dumb and/or greedy... So why punish us further? HTFU
Dracvlad Taishi Combine Second-Dawn 2231	Posted - 2016.08.17 21:10:32 - [160] - Quote Faylee Freir wrote: I dont officially speak for VMG but i can say that i personally believe that if you blow up a miniluv alt citadel it will have negligable effect since they are easily replaced. I also wanted to talk about the wreck ehp change and others complaining about the "buff to ganking". Popping freighter wrecks was 100% uncounterable and could be done in a cheap Thrasher. You can ask miniluv how 1 person dedicated themselves to popping a ton of miniluv gank wrecks for almost and month and almost bankrupted them. Buffing wreck ehp not only benefitted gankers, but was good for everyone that was interested in looting wrecks. Not only was it beneficial to everyone but its good and proper balance to a mechanic that had no direct counter. Yes it was something that could be counted, and the gankers did a few times, it is however not easily counted. The real issue of this was the lack of understanding by CCP on the emergent game play occurring within the AG group, some of the players were actually starting to create gank characters. Who knows where this would have developed if CCP had given this a bit more time to develop. So what I find is the sudden action by Endie in pushing for it as AG starts ganking freighter wrecks, then CCP realising what they had done and then buffing the EHP of freighters to balance off against it and then gankers going on about the massive nerf to ganking by this balance. If CCP had looked at the situation and understood what was going on or even talked to someone from AG they might have actually thought about it and scaled it in, but no. And I would not be surprised if the person who did this had not even mentioned the fact that Ag was starting to gank freighter wrecks. The issue most of all was that AG is a bit part militia with people mainly spending bits of SP when they can spare it on toons that they only just managed to push themselves to use for ganking wrecks. It killed it stone cold dead. Now of course I will get all the normal stuff about step up your game fail AG and the like, but the thing was only a very few AG players were doing it and bang. Do the gankers have to win like that. And the answer is yes... So yes I agree with the logic of the change, but how it happened stinks... When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.17 21:28:17 - [161] - Quote Sure ratting is a pain, but it would force gankers to undock in something other than a throw away ship so the players who's assets were destroyed could have a chance at some revenge. It's not a punishment, it's only fair. When I was a ganker I spent time ratting, that's how it should be.
Herzog Wolfhammer Sigma Special Tactics Group 7953	Posted - 2016.08.17 21:34:35 - [162] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: ...or even talked to someone from AG... There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example. I still think there are factions in the organization at odds with each other. So there's hope. But I do miss the days when CODE. "always" won in space and we had a good time giving it try. Knowing they will win in the office removes motivation to try - and I'll bet the gankers themselves will become disenchanted when they realize all that HTFU cred they felt earlier was a lie. Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Dirty Forum Alt Forum Alts Anonymous 549	Posted - 2016.08.17 22:13:05 - [163] - Quote Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example. I dunno how to break this to you....but RvB is still around - so a bit premature to be talking about them purely in the past tense. As for the "bridge" between CCP and the player who kill people (in all their forms) - that is the style of play that most of the CCP devs enjoyed back when they were allowed to openly play EVE and be a dev. It isn't some big conspiracy - they are just naturally inclined to favour their own personally preferred play-style within the game... The bright side for you is there are fewer of those devs left, and new ones coming in who aren't as steeped in that side of the game - there may be hope for you yet on that front - time will tell.
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.17 22:37:56 - [164] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example. I dunno how to break this to you....but RvB is still around - so a bit premature to be talking about them purely in the past tense. As for the "bridge" between CCP and the players who kill people (in all their forms) - that is the style of play that most of the CCP devs enjoyed back when they were allowed to openly play EVE and be a dev. It isn't some big conspiracy - they are just naturally inclined to favour their own personally preferred play-style within the game... The bright side for you is there are fewer of those devs left, and new ones coming in who aren't as steeped in that side of the game - there may be hope for you yet on that front - time will tell. edit: Oh and OP - I'm still not CODE. - and you are still an idiot whose suggestion is doomed to be ignored Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content as well, and give players the ability to go after those that suicide gank their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot.
Dirty Forum Alt Forum Alts Anonymous 549	Posted - 2016.08.17 23:00:02 - [165] - Quote Cockchaos wrote: Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot. If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it.... Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can already deal damage to them....you simply refuse to. To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes just so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point.
Herzog Wolfhammer Sigma Special Tactics Group 7954	Posted - 2016.08.17 23:35:29 - [166] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: There's a wall between CCP and AG, and a bridge between the easy kill community and CCP. That's why the kill-farming ruse called "RvB" was able to go on so long, as just one example. I dunno how to break this to you....but RvB is still around - so a bit premature to be talking about them purely in the past tense. As for the "bridge" between CCP and the players who kill people (in all their forms) - that is the style of play that most of the CCP devs enjoyed back when they were allowed to openly play EVE and be a dev. It isn't some big conspiracy - they are just naturally inclined to favour their own personally preferred play-style within the game... The bright side for you is there are fewer of those devs left, and new ones coming in who aren't as steeped in that side of the game - there may be hope for you yet on that front - time will tell. edit: Oh and OP - I'm still not CODE. - and you are still an idiot whose suggestion is doomed to be ignored You protest too much. As for developers playing the game their way and bias to those ends, well I think everybody can admit the game was better when the developers actually played it at all. Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Dirty Forum Alt Forum Alts Anonymous 551	Posted - 2016.08.17 23:39:30 - [167] - Quote Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: You protest too much. As for developers playing the game their way and bias to those ends, well I think everybody can admit the game was better when the developers actually played it at all. It had its issues, but yes - it was. I think things would have gone a different way had they made an example of the devs who cheated and put in safeguards to prevent future occurrences...but had not banned devs from actively playing.
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.17 23:56:43 - [168] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Cockchaos wrote: Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot. If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it.... Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can already deal damage to them....you simply refuse to. To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes just so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point. Why are you so against putting mechanics in place that don't change ones ability to suicide gank, and also gives the EVE community the means to retaliate against those who suicide ganked them??? Oh wait, thats right, you are a CODE alt hahahaha
Dirty Forum Alt Forum Alts Anonymous 551	Posted - 2016.08.17 23:58:47 - [169] - Quote Cockchaos wrote: Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Cockchaos wrote: Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot. If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it.... Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can already deal damage to them....you simply refuse to. *To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes just* so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything*.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point. Why are you so against putting mechanics in place that don't change ones ability to suicide gank, and also gives the EVE community the means to retaliate against those who suicide ganked them??? Oh wait, thats right, you are a CODE alt hahahaha I honestly don't think you can read... I bolded/underlined part of my post that you just quoted* - see if you can find 2 whole brain cells to rub together and try to read it...
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.18 00:00:18 - [170] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Cockchaos wrote: Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Cockchaos wrote: Yes I was born with more balls than brains, and I expect my suggestions to be ignored, however, you have to admit that these changes do no harm to suicide ganking. You must also admit that these changes would create some content and give players the ability to deal damage to those who suicide ganked their assets. If you say otherwise, you are an idiot. If it didn't affect them at all it would be pointless of you to bother requesting it.... Also as I keep pointing out to you - you can already deal damage to them....you simply refuse to. *To be honest from my perspective it would be worth seeing CCP implement your silly changes just* so I could mock you when you came up with new excuses why you were unwilling to do anything*.... But CCP still won't do so, so it is a moot point. Why are you so against putting mechanics in place that don't change ones ability to suicide gank, and also gives the EVE community the means to retaliate against those who suicide ganked them??? Oh wait, thats right, you are a CODE alt hahahaha I honestly don't think you can read... I bolded/underlined part of my post that you just quoted* - see if you can find 2 whole brain cells to rub together and try to read it... You don't actually mean that though, that's why I ignored it. You and I both know that you and your boyfriends would be crushed if these changes were made.

Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.18 00:01:28 - [171] - Quote It's so funny to me how worked up you get about this, we both know why you do though hahahahaha That is why earlier in this thread you freaked out like a little teenaged girl hahahaha
Dirty Forum Alt Forum Alts Anonymous 551	Posted - 2016.08.18 00:06:51 - [172] - Quote In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread... But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion.
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.18 00:09:46 - [173] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread... But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion. Debatable hahahaha Yes, blessed with more balls than brains, you are good at pointing out the obvious, terrible at hiding the fact that you are a CODE alt hahahaha What blows your cover is that you don't want the player base to be able to retaliate against gankers.
Dirty Forum Alt Forum Alts Anonymous 551	Posted - 2016.08.18 00:15:47 - [174] - Quote Cockchaos wrote: Dirty Forum Alt wrote: In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread... But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion. Debatable hahahaha Yes, blessed with more balls than brains, you are good at pointing out the obvious, terrible at hiding the fact that you are a CODE alt hahahaha What blows your cover is that you don't want the player base to be able to retaliate against gankers. Well, I wasn't aware I needed to hide something that is self evidently not true... Should I try harder to hide the fact that I am also the owner of CCP? Or the fact that every CEO of every corporation in EVE is actually my alt? Perhaps I should be trying to hide the fact that you've been permanently banned from EVE? I mean with most people I don't have to hide these things, because they are self evidently not true....But with you that seems to equate to proof positive... Also - since we have clearly established that you have no balls and are too chicken to do a single ***ing thing....does that mean you actually have a negative* supply of brains? That actually explains a lot...
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 16	Posted - 2016.08.18 00:18:23 - [175] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Cockchaos wrote: Dirty Forum Alt wrote: In point of fact I have remained calm throughout this entire thread... But as we have illustrated you are an idiot who can't read, so I suppose I understand your confusion. Debatable hahahaha Yes, blessed with more balls than brains, you are good at pointing out the obvious, terrible at hiding the fact that you are a CODE alt hahahaha What blows your cover is that you don't want the player base to be able to retaliate against gankers. Well, I wasn't aware I needed to hide something that is self evidently not true... Should I try harder to hide the fact that I am also the owner of CCP? Or the fact that every CEO of every corporation in EVE is actually my alt? Perhaps I should be trying to hide the fact that you've been permanently banned from EVE? I mean with most people I don't have to hide these things, because they are self evidently not true....But with you that seems to equate to proof positive... Also - since we have clearly established that you have no balls and are too chicken to do a single ***ing thing....does that mean you actually have a negative* supply of brains? That actually explains a lot... Wtfuck are you babbling about lol, stay on topic please.
Nitshe Razvedka 1233	Posted - 2016.08.18 03:20:52 - [176] - Quote CrazyRooster is after my pot-stiring-award. Must get a DNA check. (might have been that wild ni in Tama) Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS. Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Dom Arkaral Bite the pillow 561	Posted - 2016.08.18 03:24:22 - [177] - Quote Cockchaos wrote: Yes I was born with more balls than brains I highly doubt that, especially since: You're talking on an alt (like you were scared of repercussions), You obviously never ganked (your limited knowledge on how to stop something you supposedly did, dead giveaway), You do a lot of big talk, but you're unable to do anything you say Stop trying to be a victim when you're nothing but an excuse. Adapt or Die Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r Gù+Nitshe's favorite Gù+Bane of Holeysaltmountain 01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116
Nitshe Razvedka 1233	Posted - 2016.08.18 03:31:30 - [178] - Quote Dom, I leave you in good hands with the OP. try and find your safe place . Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS. Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Cockchaos Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 18	Posted - 2016.08.18 03:31:52 - [179] - Quote Dom Arkaral wrote: Cockchaos wrote: Yes I was born with more balls than brains I highly doubt that, especially since: You're talking on an alt (like you were scared of repercussions), You obviously never ganked (your limited knowledge on how to stop something you supposedly did, dead giveaway), You do a lot of big talk, but you're unable to do anything you say Stop trying to be a victim when you're nothing but an excuse. Adapt or Die Hahahaha, more balls than brains regarding real life bud. Balls don't cross over to an internet spaceship game, however, my stupidity does. For now I'm using this character to talk on the forums, eventually I will use my newest main most likely, I bio massed my main main, the one I used to gank years ago. I have not said I would do anything, the purpose of this post is to point out that gankers operate with impunity in high sec due to current game mechanics. I'm not all that interested in disrupting CODE, more interested in CCP changing mechanics so they undock in something other than a throw away gank ship. ...idiot.
Dom Arkaral Bite the pillow 561	Posted - 2016.08.18 09:23:01 - [180] - Quote Cockchaos wrote: Dom Arkaral wrote: Cockchaos wrote: Yes I was born with more balls than brains I highly doubt that, especially since: You're talking on an alt (like you were scared of repercussions), You obviously never ganked (your limited knowledge on how to stop something you supposedly did, dead giveaway), You do a lot of big talk, but you're unable to do anything you say Stop trying to be a victim when you're nothing but an excuse. Adapt or Die Hahahaha, more balls than brains regarding real life bud. Balls don't cross over to an internet spaceship game, however, my stupidity does. For now I'm using this character to talk on the forums, eventually I will use my main.... actually I dont know which character is my main at this point, I biomassed my main main, the toon I used to gank with years ago while you were busy grinding your moon elf up in World of Warcraft. I have not said I would do anything until it is feasible to do more than disrupt CODE, the purpose of this post is to point out that gankers operate with impunity in high sec due to current game mechanics. I'm hoping things change, so members of CODE have to undock in something other than throw away gank ships. ...you imbecile Go on with the name calling, it's really showing your toxic cause. Keep on asking for CCP to do the player's job for you, it'll never happen. Good luck in your endeavors... If you ever grow a pair to actually do something else than whining on the forums lmao Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r Gù+Nitshe's favorite Gù+Bane of Holeysaltmountain 01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.