EVE Search - Destroyers

All Channels

Warfare & Tactics

Destroyers

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zaltone STEEL CITY. Main Force Patrol 0	Posted - 2011.12.21 22:57:00 - [1] - Quote How are the new destroyers fixes working out ? I was wanting to start flying them in the pvp groups i fly with.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 182	Posted - 2011.12.22 00:14:00 - [2] - Quote Zaltone wrote: How are the new destroyers fixes working out ? I was wanting to start flying them in the pvp groups i fly with. Try them out and please tell us.
Axel Korgain The League of Extraordinarily Wealthy Gentlemen 1	Posted - 2011.12.22 00:24:00 - [3] - Quote RubyPorto wrote: Zaltone wrote: How are the new destroyers fixes working out ? I was wanting to start flying them in the pvp groups i fly with. Try them out and please tell us. Typical dumb **** response.
Lady Spank GET OUT NASTY FACE 573	Posted - 2011.12.22 00:24:00 - [4] - Quote They gud (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) GÖÑ Inactive 21/12 unltil the new year, seasons greetings GÖÑ
Killstealing Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild 213	Posted - 2011.12.22 00:44:00 - [5] - Quote frigate sig radius 33% dps increase hail is buffed as well by the way
Cromwell Savage The Rock Hard Roosters 2	Posted - 2011.12.22 00:48:00 - [6] - Quote LOL - I had no issues with using Dessies long before the patch. They made an already good ship (Thrasher) even better .
Goose99 Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 360	Posted - 2011.12.22 01:53:00 - [7] - Quote Thrasher is the way to go. Coercer has 1 mid, and other two are either slow (by frig standard) blaster or rail.
Fear An'Bhata Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2011.12.22 05:40:00 - [8] - Quote I have a decent Thrasher fit setup for L2's passive shield tank.. one-shots L1's and makes pretty quick work on most L2's at 20km. This is the 3 year old loadout. I'm adjusting it as time goes on. http://eve.battleclinic.com/loadout/10170-Thrasher-Passive-Shield-Tank-lvl-2-missions.html I'll upload my modified fit to this build in a day or so.. new skills taken into consideration (Fear the Boatman) Fear An'Bhata
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 182	Posted - 2011.12.22 05:45:00 - [9] - Quote Fear An'Bhata wrote: I have a decent Thrasher fit setup for L2's passive shield tank.. one-shots L1's and makes pretty quick work on most L2's at 20km. This is the 3 year old loadout. I'm adjusting it as time goes on. http://eve.battleclinic.com/loadout/10170-Thrasher-Passive-Shield-Tank-lvl-2-missions.html I'll upload my modified fit to this build in a day or so.. new skills taken into consideration The PvP of shooting red crosses really is tricky stuff.
Fear An'Bhata Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2011.12.22 05:49:00 - [10] - Quote Dps is Dps =)
Brotha Umad Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 3	Posted - 2011.12.22 13:26:00 - [11] - Quote Fear An'Bhata wrote: Dps is Dps =) Yeah and you won't do much with this setup. SPRs are for drakes and rattlers. BTW the OP specified he was talking about pvp.
Lady Spank GET OUT NASTY FACE 576	Posted - 2011.12.22 13:33:00 - [12] - Quote I enjoy the flying of Destroyer class wessels. Thrasher is still the most popular, Catalyst shortly following thanks to the hybrid buff but the other two can be worthwhile simply because they are underestimated. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) GÖÑ Inactive 21/12 unltil the new year, seasons greetings GÖÑ
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 182	Posted - 2011.12.22 14:27:00 - [13] - Quote Lady Spank wrote: I enjoy the flying of Destroyer class wessels. Thrasher is still the most popular, Catalyst shortly following thanks to the hybrid buff but the other two can be worthwhile simply because they are underestimated. I'll take my Catalyst for 850 dps, Trebek.
Dark Pangolin Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse 24	Posted - 2011.12.22 16:01:00 - [14] - Quote Rail Cormy is not to be dismissed...pew pew...100km...pew pew...
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 183	Posted - 2011.12.22 16:56:00 - [15] - Quote Dark Pangolin wrote: Rail Cormy is not to be dismissed...pew pew...100km...pew pew... NOBODY expects the sniper IBIS. EDIT: Oh, and 140dps at 100km on a Cormy? Sweet.
Marduk Nibiru Physical Chaos Skunk Works. 1	Posted - 2011.12.22 18:43:00 - [16] - Quote They still pop retrievers.
Capital T Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 24	Posted - 2011.12.23 05:31:00 - [17] - Quote Axel Korgain wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Zaltone wrote: How are the new destroyers fixes working out ? I was wanting to start flying them in the pvp groups i fly with. Try them out and please tell us. Typical dumb ** response. Typical dumb ** question.
Mathilde D'Arc The Intaki Ladies Deep Space Astrogation Auxiliary 0	Posted - 2011.12.23 13:46:00 - [18] - Quote Capital T wrote: Axel Korgain wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Zaltone wrote: How are the new destroyers fixes working out ? I was wanting to start flying them in the pvp groups i fly with. Try them out and please tell us. Typical dumb ** response. Typical dumb question. Typical dumb ** alt poster that thinks he is clever/funny.
Capital T Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 24	Posted - 2011.12.23 20:01:00 - [19] - Quote Mathilde D'Arc wrote: Capital T wrote: Axel Korgain wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Zaltone wrote: How are the new destroyers fixes working out ? I was wanting to start flying them in the pvp groups i fly with. Try them out and please tell us. Typical dumb ** response. Typical dumb question. Typical dumb alt poster that thinks he is clever/funny. And your point is...? You must be Great! Oh bow to this ********!^ *** please... lol
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 192	Posted - 2011.12.23 20:05:00 - [20] - Quote Capital T wrote: Mathilde D'Arc wrote: Typical dumb ** alt poster that thinks he is clever/funny. And your point is...? You must be Great! Oh bow to this ********!^ *** please... lol Typical dumb ass flame war. You both lose due to failure to make it entertaining, and the rest of us lose because we read that.
Marduk Nibiru Physical Chaos Skunk Works. 3	Posted - 2011.12.23 20:43:00 - [21] - Quote RubyPorto wrote: Capital T wrote: Mathilde D'Arc wrote: Typical dumb ** alt poster that thinks he is clever/funny. And your point is...? You must be Great! Oh bow to this ********!^ *** please... lol Typical dumb ass flame war. You both lose due to failure to make it entertaining, and the rest of us lose because we read that. Typical humor elitist.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 194	Posted - 2011.12.23 20:44:00 - [22] - Quote Marduk Nibiru wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Capital T wrote: Mathilde D'Arc wrote: Typical dumb ** alt poster that thinks he is clever/funny. And your point is...? You must be Great! Oh bow to this ********!^ *** please... lol Typical dumb ass flame war. You both lose due to failure to make it entertaining, and the rest of us lose because we read that. Typical humor elitist. Phlegm is the lightest humour, how did you know?
river Zateki Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension 2	Posted - 2011.12.28 01:05:00 - [23] - Quote Marduk Nibiru wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Capital T wrote: Mathilde D'Arc wrote: Typical dumb ** alt poster that thinks he is clever/funny. And your point is...? You must be Great! Oh bow to this ********!^ *** please... lol Typical dumb ass flame war. You both lose due to failure to make it entertaining, and the rest of us lose because we read that. Typical humor elitist. All of you just shut up lol
Harlot Hohannson Eye on Wang Poo 15	Posted - 2011.12.28 01:28:00 - [24] - Quote Typical lol OMG o I got my boobs out alt poster post
Vimsy Vortis Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation 170	Posted - 2011.12.28 01:37:00 - [25] - Quote My coercer would like another medslot. As would the retribution I don't have because why would I ever buy one of those. But really the changes are pretty sweet.
Pinaculus Insanely Twisted 83	Posted - 2011.12.28 17:30:00 - [26] - Quote I thought there was some unofficial CCP policy that the Coercer/Retribution were supposed to be PVP crippled ships because Amarr already has too many flyable ones. I know sometimes it's difficult to realize just how much you spend on incidental things each month or year, but seriously, EVE is very cheap entertainment compared to most things... If you are a smoker, smoke one less pack a week and pay for EVE, with money left over to pick up a cheap bundle of flowers for the EVE widow upstairs.
Hirana Yoshida Behavioral Affront 206	Posted - 2011.12.28 18:37:00 - [27] - Quote Naah, they have one mid because Amarr is an enlightened and highly social-able people. The devout know that while being alone can be good, having a buddy is always :awesome:. Besides, fly them right and you'll pop most **** before it knows what hit it .. hahahahahaha.
Cearain Imperial Outlaws 119	Posted - 2011.12.28 23:01:00 - [28] - Quote With destoyers having the sensor strength of frigates the sig radius just a bit over frigates, larger tank and more cap than frigates and the dps of a cruiser yet using frigate sized guns - who needs frigates anymore? I'm not really sure what purpose all those frigate classed ships serve anymore other than as targets for destroyers. IMHO Destroyers should have their sensor strength nerfed. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
Garr Earthbender Quantum Cats Syndicate 5	Posted - 2011.12.29 17:39:00 - [29] - Quote Hirana Yoshida wrote: Naah, they have one mid because Amarr is an enlightened and highly social-able people. The devout know that while being alone can be good, having a buddy is always :awesome:. Besides, fly them right and you'll pop most **** before it knows what hit it .. hahahahahaha. Yeah, I've seen some fits on battleclinic from Amamake type people that have no prop mod and run either a scram/disruptor. The dusruptor guy runs with a tracking enhancer in his lows to buff his scorch range. But apparently, by the time someone figures out that they're going down, it's not enough time to get out. LOL. I'm gonna fit up 3-4 Coercers and see how it goes myself.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.