EVE Search - RKK capital yard attack

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

RKK capital yard attack

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 10:07:00 - [1] Quote: Is funny to see BoB and BoB pets complaining about meta gaming. I don't see a single bob or supposed bob pet complaining about the outcome here, more cheering it. If you look carefully and actually read the majority of the posts here you will see only 1 side actually whining (p.s. it's not BOB!)
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 13:22:00 - [2] Edited by: PirateShampoo on 30/03/2007 13:24:56 Quote: BoB and LV don't have much in common, but what they have is the same disrespect for others and treating people like dirt. Wow. Just Wow. Go read up and learn about the history of these two alliances, they have masses in common. And you talking about disrespect? Mirrors that way -> P.S. After reading you employment history and seeing you have only been in an 0.0 alliance for 8 days I can see why you would make this mistake. I suggest you do you research before posting rubbish, unless being a member of 'Mega Mining Corporation' gives you insight to all of eve, it's alliances and players.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 13:34:00 - [3] Originally by: Khensu Blade What's a BoB pet? The only definition I can come up with from reading this thread is "Ally of BoB". ??? I'm guessing everyone has their own definition... In order to successfully commit against an enemy in war you have to dehumanize your opponent. This is nothing other than that. Don't read to much into it and just ignore it.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 13:44:00 - [4] Edited by: PirateShampoo on 30/03/2007 13:43:30 Edited by: PirateShampoo on 30/03/2007 13:41:15 Originally by: Liquid Vision Such a hoot that the Bobbits YET AGAIN got help by CCP that no one else knew about and they still couldn't hold their position. Honestly it was a brilliant tactic by BOB and pets. They stacked throwaway pet fleets in the systems leading up to F-T and then they packed their main cap fleet inside the system at the POS. So, the support fleets couldn't get there because unbeknownst to them or anyone else besides BOB, CCP had capped the limit of people inside the system. Thus, really the only coalition forces able to make it in were those cynoing in with caps. So, it really seems like Molle and "his balls" knew they were going to lose the Titan, they just decided to bork the game mechanics w/ their GM help to kill as many as possible w/o suffering staggering loses of their own. Of course. . .if capping memeber limits in system is going to be the norm now, swell. However, i'm sure the little LV masses (those actually left ) are quite a bit miffed that this only got implemented for the Bobbits and not for them. Tho really not at all surprising. Have fun reading all the Bobbit propaganda. Maybe this thread will get to 50 pages of their little Bobbit tears. I do sympathize tho. . .it must REALLY suck to lose a Titan THREE FREAKING DAYS before it comes outta the cooker. Jesus. . .all that time and effort. The Coalition has 90% of its 50 lost dreads replaced already, but ya can't replace a Titan that quick.... LV are not miffed, JV1V never exceeded 600 players so it never hit the cap that was announced and implemented by CCP well nearly 9 months ago. LV's problems in JV1V where due to node crashes/resets by admins. This never happened last night as the node's held but did reach the cap. Completely different situation.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 14:03:00 - [5] Liquid your trolling is sinking to lower depths than even I thought possible. Given that I was at JV1V along with the rest of LV/Exe and Rise, none of us saw 800 in that system - it's complete rubbish, anyone from there will confirm that. I don't believe anyone saw you there either? Perhaps someone will speak up on your behalf and prove you where there but I doubt it.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 14:57:00 - [6] Quote: Same old BoB here on this thread argueing both sides. "GMs did tell anyone!! Thats why our support fleet wasnt there either!!" Wait thats not working...ok."Yeah tey said this months ago...see we are just smarter than you!!!!" Humm, well I see liquid vision trying to put across usual trolling posts and I see someone trying to rebut him, neither are BoB. I suggest you take Nez's very sound advice in the post a couple above.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 15:10:00 - [7] Edited by: PirateShampoo on 30/03/2007 15:07:32 Quote: What you are failing to realize is that the 700 rule is anything but that. Its an arbitrary thing that suspect (all of ccp is suspect after recent events)GMs can throw around and use willy nilly...When it suits them and their goals. Just stop and think why is it these things never ever go against BoB? Coincidence can only account for so much people. Open your eyes and look at all of the evidence logically. Only on sensible conclusion can be made. CCP has never said the limit was arbitrary where do you get these supposed facts from? The blog said 700 and when 700 got into the system the cap was activated, looks completely automated to me. In addition given the fact that BoB could also not get their support fleet in due to the cap completely rubbishes your proposition that BoB received so called unfair advantage due to the cap.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 15:45:00 - [8] Originally by: Pj peng Why was this 700 player limit placed on this occasion? When goons took LVs system... it didn't happen i think disallowing the coalitions support fleet in was stupid, and don't help the whole band of developers situation either.. making it look like you only create these ideas when needed or enforce these rules. i personally think you should refund all the capital ships of the coalition as you didn't allow there support in, making the fight bias and basicully eliminating half of one team instantly. As previously stated, JV1V never reached the cap, the only one who has said it did was liquid vision and he's as clueless as ever.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 15:56:00 - [9] Originally by: darth solo ok, so all the good folks jump in the capital fleet, then the support is meant to follow, but it cant because the GMs have just made a 700 cap limit on the system without telling anyone?. leaving all you cap fleet outnumbered. lol u folks were seriously screwed over. id be after ship replacements. from now on all we will see happen is that the first to get 400 in system wins. because regardless of the oppositions numbers they will only be able to bring 300 to the fight due the cap, hillarious. d solo. I wish people would read the dev blogs, there was no sudden cap, the hard cap has been in place since it was announced 9 months ago in the dev blog. End of.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 16:04:00 - [10] Originally by: Narciss Sevar Originally by: PirateShampoo Edited by: PirateShampoo on 30/03/2007 15:56:16 Originally by: darth solo ok, so all the good folks jump in the capital fleet, then the support is meant to follow, but it cant because the GMs have just made a 700 cap limit on the system without telling anyone?. leaving all you cap fleet outnumbered. lol u folks were seriously screwed over. id be after ship replacements. from now on all we will see happen is that the first to get 400 in system wins. because regardless of the oppositions numbers they will only be able to bring 300 to the fight due the cap, hillarious. d solo. I wish people would read the dev blogs, there was no sudden cap, the hard cap has been in place since it was announced 9 months ago in the dev blog. End of. Just in case anyone else missed it (and it seems like everyone did) Dev Blog - 700 Hard Cap Been to jita lately? Well maybe it was removed from Jita as there is no tatical advantage from blobbing Jita, this really is one for the developers now, I am dropping the subject and I am hoping (probably in vain) that everyone else will too.
PirateShampoo Minmatar UK Corp FATAL Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.30 18:38:00 - [11] Edited by: PirateShampoo on 30/03/2007 18:36:15 Quote: Incorrect. Yes there was a cap installed some 7 months ago. But after many complaints, that cap was removed again, as evidenced by JV1V. Now, all of a sudden, the cap is being brought back to help BoB again. And people wonder why CCP is getting such a bad rep for favoring one alliance Well I have no such word on the removal of the caps, no one else has mentioned they where implemented then remove as far as I know they are still in force. Of course if you have link to a dev blog or dev forum or patch note then I will apologise. Otherwise the cap is still in place. And as I have said throughout this thread. JV1V never had 700 pilots in space at the same time and would never have reached such as cap. I was there and others from LV, Exe and Rise can confirm this

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.