|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

HaydenJD
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 19:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:Hi,
Thank you for finally looking into AF bonuses and finally giving the ret another mid slot. Love you so much for these things.
Instead of giving them all a bonus to the penalty (50%) on the sig radius for MWD's, how about a 200% 80% velocity bonus to frigate class Afterburners instead?
Most AF's are pretty tight to fit with AB's as it is. I personally think that an AB bonus would give them a unique role/niche in eve where they'd get used and be able to fit a more beefy tank instead of just being a high DPS interceptor.
Thanks for reading.
Our brilliant leader has had an amazing idea, listen to this CCP. |

HaydenJD
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 20:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:The fail is positively bubbling to the surface in this one.
Recap for the failures: - 3 years ago or there about, CCP added a blanket AB speed bonus to AFs and had the concept tested on SiSi. - Prior to SiSi testing the players cursed with common sense argued that it would make them so hilariously OP that not only would nothing else be used except in blobs but pilots would never be able to stop laughing maniacally when flying them. - We (yes, I am burdened with common sense) further argued that it would widen the performance gaps within the AF class to an untenable degree. - Testing proved both points to be bang on in all respects .. common sense: 2, Idiocy: 0.
Now you suggest a bonus that is even higher than the one tested in addition to added slots and tanks?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, /me takes in extra air Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha.....
Nice job on being a uselss ****. CCP are changing AF's, we just want them to change it for the better. ABs on AFs are how is should be, giving them a bonus to AB speed without making it into a ceptor would be the right way to do it. Also compairing 3 years ago to now its completely fucktarded. |

HaydenJD
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 18:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xenial Jesse Taalo wrote:Why do they get a role bonus at all? All we were asking for was the 4th bonus and something doen about the Retri's mids.
I don't like the AB idea since that steps on the toes of AB interceptors. But I blame the MWD nerf too for problems like that.
No role bonus to AFs at all sounds fine to me.
AB interceptors wastes the bonus, they were DESIGNED TO MWD. AB AF would be perfect for what they do now. |

HaydenJD
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 13:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:They aren't tackle ships, as 3 classes for said ships already exist, one of which is *heavy* tackle. Interceptors, Interdictors, & Heavy Interdictors.
The middle ground would be somewhere around 1400m/s (ship depending), which is a 50% speed bonus: - barely faster than a cruiser (1600 thorax is 1200m/s, 1800 overloaded) - still insanely overpowered if said ships actually get the tackle or combat missile boats
AFs are like Miniature HACs. HACs are geared to go toe to toe with the T1 ships over them, Battlecruisers. By relation AFs are geared to go toe to toe with T1 cruisers.
heavy combat ship standings: T1 Frigate < AFs ~= T1 Cruisers T1 Cruisers < HACs ~= T1 Battlecruisers T1 Battlecruisers < Command Ships ~= T1 Battleships
That's how the game would live up when the AFs go through.
A problem I've encountered with trying to put a MWD on an AF is fitting requirements, I had to change my fits. Most people I have seen flying AFs use ABs so why not give a bonus that would benefit and define a role like it has been said but a small AB bonus would be fine, better than a bonus for MWDs that will go largely unused. I agree with everything you have said though and this other guy clearly hasn't flown in 0.0 where they will be used mostly and seen how they are actually used. They are for dealing damage and that's obvious, not tackle like he thinks (I have no idea why he thinks that even). |

HaydenJD
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 18:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Do you think this will be the thing to make people change their fits though? I will still use ABs personally. |

HaydenJD
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 18:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ryans Revenge wrote:I'd prefer a bonus making Assault Frigates invulnerable to Warp Scramblers myself :).
Stupid idea. Go get a Skiff. |
|
|
|