Originally by: monkeyduck

---

The only person who can answer what actually happened is CCP. Pictures as proof on either side is laughable, and even in this day of technology videos are easily edited (terror shield, anyone?). Both sides will have to believe what they want - of course both sides are going to try to play it out that their side won no matter what actually did happen... seriously why wouldn't they?

Days to concoct the evil plan as a smack to the face to the Coalition (as it was intended), knowing that no one would believe him with no proof which was included much later... He even took time to edit the cute little banner. Truth cannot be determined in this, or any other thread. However, the intent of the original post comes at a surprisingly subpar level given the time and intent. Well calculated with the needed 'Oomph!' to really give it to us would have included your wonderful story supplemented instantaneously with your proof. Take the extra day next time, please.

---

Originally by: Indiano Arko

---

Originally by: fafa2365

---

Hi all, hi Sir Molle.

Concerning the screenshots, to keep credibility, BoB should have post ORIGINAL PNG screenshots, not reencoded in JPEG. Bring them (original, not PNG reencoded), and then, maybe, we will trust you. Oh also, don't rename them please ;)

---

PNG is a format with compression. Like JPEG but uses different algorithms. You probably referring to original BMPs. But as been mentioned here a professional can make perfectly faked screenshots - no one will be able to recognize it.

Anyways all these argues have no sense - no matter what you will be told you will keep believe into what you want to believe. It's a human nature.

---

Originally by: Fornacis

---

Sorry...can't bother myself to read 17 pages of rabble, but can't CCP come forward and confirm/deny??.....no wait...

---

Originally by: Touched darkness

---

Its not like BoB would admit to any loss anyway so i¦m doubting this story of theirs .And its clear fact that if there was no lag,BoB would be crushed right there.I mean,look at sheer Coalition firepower in that battle...Lucky,lucky BoB

---

Originally by: Marcus Druallis

---

Originally by: Centerfold

---

Originally by: Touched darkness

---

Its not like BoB would admit to any loss anyway so i¦m doubting this story of theirs .And its clear fact that if there was no lag,BoB would be crushed right there.I mean,look at sheer Coalition firepower in that battle...Lucky,lucky BoB

---

Maybe you need to go see '300'. Numbers don't win against skill. If there was no lag, BoB would slaughter Persian's wave after wave. Coalition should be thankfull that there was system limit. They only lost 50 cap ships. They could have lost them all.

---

lol? This is not ancient greek battle. This is eve. In eve, numbers that are willing, win.

---

Originally by: DeadDuck

---

Originally by: Xelphior

---

Edited by: Xelphior on 03/04/2007 22:18:27

Originally by: Touched darkness

---

Its not like BoB would admit to any loss anyway so i¦m doubting this story of theirs .And its clear fact that if there was no lag,BoB would be crushed right there.I mean,look at sheer Coalition firepower in that battle...Lucky,lucky BoB

---

in a fight its not size and firepower

its Skill and Strategy.

bob have proven time and again they can take odds of 3-1 against.

relook at ya facts

added to the fact bob + allies have 3 titans, if a substantial number of ships came in, they'd get nuked multiple times.

---

Skill in F-T ????!!!!! the biggest majority of the coalition fleet in F-T never loaded the screen...

Strategie in F-T ????? The biggest majority of the coalition fleet werent even allowed to jump in. A Titan wasnt alowed to jump in, 100 tec2 BS from D2 werent alowed to jump in... almost 1000 ships werent alowed to jump in.

3-1 odds ???? The coalition fleet in F-T was outnumbered because someone remembered to cap the system.

After your statment I have to ask...Have you even been there ???

---

Originally by: Drosselmeyer

---

Edited by: Drosselmeyer on 04/04/2007 02:00:15


At the time this was just considered another one of BoBs "skills". Now when other alliances attempt to use the same tactics BoB pioneered against BoB its lame explioting and the devs take steps to prevent it?

---

Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam

---

Edited by: Tearavygh Quillam on 04/04/2007 11:56:56

Originally by: Xelphior

---

Edited by: Xelphior on 03/04/2007 22:18:27

Originally by: Touched darkness

---

Its not like BoB would admit to any loss anyway so i¦m doubting this story of theirs .And its clear fact that if there was no lag,BoB would be crushed right there.I mean,look at sheer Coalition firepower in that battle...Lucky,lucky BoB

---

in a fight its not size and firepower

its Skill and Strategy.

bob have proven time and again they can take odds of 3-1 against.

relook at ya facts

added to the fact bob + allies have 3 titans, if a substantial number of ships came in, they'd get nuked multiple times.

---

If you were on the battlefield with BoB just for a few times, you'd realize that they don't fight if the odds aren't in their favor. I don't blame them, but you should get facts.

Edit:
And then again:
- there were some 5 fleets with 70+ BS in them on their way.
- 1 fleet of 200 waiting to jump portal in
- 2 titans on Coalition side.

mkay? I'm not sure who would have done the mopping, but neither are you, you're just pretending.

---