|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Capqu
Half Empty
1204
|
Posted - 2016.11.25 12:07:40 -
[1] - Quote
waste of goddamn time
fozzie sov was enough of a nerf to bombing already, this is totally unnecessary
noone is bombing currently in eve because you reliably cannot predict where the fight will be and bombing requires some setup time
these changes would have been good 2 years ago
now adays test and friends are literally flying around in the most bombable doctrines in history but noone can be bothered bombing them because its impossible to predict where engagements will happen and super dds are just better bombs anyway
in adition 0 velocity bombs was some of the hardest **** to pull off and almost never saw any use so removing it for no reason i dont even understand, you just dont want people to be able to innovate?
thanks for the final nail o7 bongers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1208
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 08:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote: Its truly random.
truly random is a concept, not an obtainable operation
what you mean to say it is sufficiently complex such that you cannot predict the outcome with available measurements and observations
this is not a serious post, more some attempted humour being injected into my life which my doctor (medical variety) says i sorely require
-capqu m.d. (mathematics variety)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1208
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 10:22:08 -
[3] - Quote
to the above: assuming each bomb is equally likely to be hit [unlikely in practise], the probability of 8 destroyers destroying 8 bombs if all 8 destroyers fire their defender missile at the same time while all 8 bombs are in range is as follows ( 8! / 8^8 ) = .0024~ just under 1/400 basically
all these launchers will do is make bombing require more people, not be harder or more interesting, just more tedious and frustrating as the fc herds a bag of spiders to make it increasingly likely that a full wave of bombs lands, the bombers have to add more bombs to each wave. whereas before you would launch exactly max bombs per wave, now you will probably want to launch max+3 or 4 to have a high chance of a full hit
this just exasperates all the boring parts of bombing (especially in tidi), where non-fc bomber fleet members literally just sit cloaked for hours. it doesn't provide any interesting game play, it just nerfs an already dying way of 3rd partying or supplementing your main fleet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1208
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 10:27:36 -
[4] - Quote
and like i previously said, fozziesov and being unable to predict the location of engagements already severely hampers a bomber wings ability to influence an engagement. adding more required pilots per bomb wave through these launchers just ensures less people will be willing to try it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1213
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 13:00:16 -
[5] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Excellent change, long overdue.
state ur reasoning
[read: make up some reasoning now u brown-nosing pizza ****]
oh wait i forgot u just blindly agree with anything that nerfs things u don't do nor ever will do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1213
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 13:36:29 -
[6] - Quote
Kasia en Tilavine wrote:I think everyone appreciates the effort to make the defender missiles and their skills actually do something. But as a dozen people have already said.... nobody bombs anymore. Bombs are so lacking in utility or efficacy, this is the gravestone of bombing as a whole. Unless this release is PAIRED with a whole new suite of bombs, "bombing" will be all but forgotten.
Here is a list of crazy new utility to bombing that you could include:
...
If you're going to let people shut down bombing runs, you need to make sure people want to bomb.
you're a new person but i like you a lot thanks for the post very eloquent [not sarcasm]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1213
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 13:37:24 -
[7] - Quote
Olmeca Gold wrote:Querns wrote:Olmeca Gold wrote:Querns wrote:There's a remedy for this. What if I want to just play a balanced game, and make my opinions about what makes it better heard, but and not make the game a huge deal in my real life? Or what if I don't care about achieving a huge organization, or just don't want to play the game in that way as a part of such an organization? Because this is how the majority who is not a part of NC/PC/Goons feels like. The remedy is to vote, not to join a large power bloc. I wouldn't worry too much, though. After our complete and total defeat in the Casino Wars, you probably won't see much of GSF on the CSM next year. Well actually I wish DBRB was CSM or something, at least some bomber voice would be heard, and he is the only one FC from null that I know. And you will prolly be replaced by other null people, so that changes nothing from our perspective.
fear not the csm, reddit is the true battleground
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1213
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 13:41:51 -
[8] - Quote
Querns wrote:Kasia en Tilavine wrote:I think everyone appreciates the effort to make the defender missiles and their skills actually do something. But as a dozen people have already said.... nobody bombs anymore. Bombs are so lacking in utility or efficacy, this is the gravestone of bombing as a whole. Unless this release is PAIRED with a whole new suite of bombs, "bombing" will be all but forgotten.
"No one" bombs any more because the entire game flies T3Cs, or other sig-tanking doctrines whose primary benefit is resistance to bombs. Providing counterplay other than training Strategic Cruisers opens up quite a bit of room for other ships to actually get used in nullsec.
completely wrong
the most common fleet doctrine in nullsec currently is an mwd shield hurricane bother super easy to bomb
on an unrelated i think you should have to actually get at least 1 killmail in the past 3 months to post on these forums because then theres a chance you might actually know what youre talking about probably not tho at least in your case
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1213
|
Posted - 2016.11.26 13:44:18 -
[9] - Quote
i said unrelated note nothing to do with u fine poster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1234
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 11:50:38 -
[10] - Quote
sorry for being rude
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
|
Capqu
Half Empty
1254
|
Posted - 2017.01.01 17:27:40 -
[11] - Quote
So are you just gonna continue perpetuating that this forum isn't for addressing feedback but instead just for posting dumb things that go into the game whether or not you get the feedback you want or are you actually going to address any of the points people (not just me) brought up?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
|
|
|