EVE Search - Command Burst Specialist change suggestion

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Command Burst Specialist change suggestion

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
SurrenderMonkey Space Llama Industries 2792	Posted - 2016.12.02 22:39:27 - [1] - Quote The disparity between the cycle time and the boost duration is very much intended. "Help, I'm bored with missions!" http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
SurrenderMonkey Space Llama Industries 2792	Posted - 2016.12.02 22:59:54 - [2] - Quote Siigari Kitawa wrote: Nevyn Auscent wrote: So no, lets not screw every single pilot who deals with boosting a moving fleet just to satisfy your desire for perfect efficiency. Alright that's fair. So why don't we permit mining boost ships to have an increase in duration? Surely that is a compromise that does not invalidate your guys' methodology. Just musing. Why don't we just go ahead and not change anything merely to avoid the utterly minuscule waste of letting the booster free-cycle? "Help, I'm bored with missions!" http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
SurrenderMonkey Space Llama Industries 2792	Posted - 2016.12.02 23:12:22 - [3] - Quote Siigari Kitawa wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: Siigari Kitawa wrote: Nevyn Auscent wrote: So no, lets not screw every single pilot who deals with boosting a moving fleet just to satisfy your desire for perfect efficiency. Alright that's fair. So why don't we permit mining boost ships to have an increase in duration? Surely that is a compromise that does not invalidate your guys' methodology. Just musing. Why don't we just go ahead and not change anything merely to avoid the utterly minuscule waste of letting the booster free-cycle? Why don't we just change everything so the game is so much easier, then people celebrate. Then one person puts up a suggestion and some people rage against 'making eve easier.' You know the past 2 years have been 100% about 'making eve easier' right? About the only thing this would make "easier" is parking an AFK booster ship in a belt for even longer than the... what, 5 hours? They get right now. Material for one batch of Laser Field Enhancement charges currently cost 235,795.5 isk in Amarr, with a 6509 isk installation fee in that station. That's less than 500 isk per shot, at current prices. Running a booster 24/7 for an entire year would cost 254,710,490 isk. There is absolutely no need to "special case" around something this inconsequential. It's hard to imagine a more absolute waste of dev time. "Help, I'm bored with missions!" http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.