EVE Search - Little Assault Frigate Buff

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Little Assault Frigate Buff

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Azazel The Misanthrope Oblivion Watch HYDRA RELOADED 122	Posted - 2016.12.03 16:14:32 - [1] - Quote Assault Frigate's role bonus should include a 50 -75% reduction to the effects of heat damage. This could emphasize their "assault" role more by allowing them to stay in the pressure cooker longer with better repairs and damage; while simultaneously better equipping them to run down faster targets by forcing them to overheat for longer than they are capable. A bonus like this could help the ships be more competitive with their contemporaries for bursts of time without overshadowing them completely and thus becoming menacing.
Lugh Crow-Slave 3343	Posted - 2016.12.04 10:16:03 - [2] - Quote no more that 25% total(5% per level) and i personally like this HOWEVER i'm against it because there has to be a better way to fix these then giving them one of the only balanced flavorings of a T3 BLOPS Hauler
Conogan Blitzkreig Pod Relocators 0	Posted - 2016.12.04 10:41:34 - [3] - Quote Man something needs t o be done abouts the resources they require to build... Or something...cuz their prices right now are bs.... They should cost an average of 4 mil since they are below cruisers, not no 25 mil, double the price of cruisers.
Lugh Crow-Slave 3343	Posted - 2016.12.04 10:59:01 - [4] - Quote lol they are T2 you pay more for a miner increase. that's how they all work besides in my experience AFs beat most T1 cruisers so that still seems right BLOPS Hauler
Kenrailae Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships. 665	Posted - 2016.12.04 11:11:10 - [5] - Quote Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: no more that 25% total(5% per level) and i personally like this HOWEVER i'm against it because there has to be a better way to fix these then giving them one of the only balanced flavorings of a T3 Delete T3D's. AF's fixed. The Law is a point of View The NPE IS a big deal
Lugh Crow-Slave 3344	Posted - 2016.12.04 11:29:10 - [6] - Quote Kenrailae wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: no more that 25% total(5% per level) and i personally like this HOWEVER i'm against it because there has to be a better way to fix these then giving them one of the only balanced flavorings of a T3 Delete T3D's. AF's fixed. i'm all for it BLOPS Hauler
baltec1 Bat Country Pandemic Legion 18460	Posted - 2016.12.04 11:32:49 - [7] - Quote T3 are the problem for lot of ship groups even after the nerfs.
Lugh Crow-Slave 3344	Posted - 2016.12.04 11:43:30 - [8] - Quote baltec1 wrote: T3 are the problem for lot of ship groups even after the nerfs. and yet we still get ppl asking for T3 BBs and frigs -.- BLOPS Hauler
Kenrailae Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships. 665	Posted - 2016.12.04 11:47:02 - [9] - Quote Impel bonuses on all the AF's. That's the way forward! The Law is a point of View The NPE IS a big deal
Dior Ambraelle University of Caille Gallente Federation 18	Posted - 2016.12.04 12:58:58 - [10] - Quote baltec1 wrote: T3 are the problem for lot of ship groups even after the nerfs. What if we would give them 1 subsystem slot that could give either attack, defense or speed bonuses? No more switching during combat. Would that help? If you want an intelligent argument, please do, I'm up for it! But if you want a trolling contest, I will win it by simply not participating.

Lugh Crow-Slave 3345	Posted - 2016.12.04 14:46:47 - [11] - Quote Dior Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: T3 are the problem for lot of ship groups even after the nerfs. What if we would give them 1 subsystem slot that could give either attack, defense or speed bonuses? No more switching during combat. Would that help? well that would defeat the point.... sooo just remove them BLOPS Hauler
baltec1 Bat Country Pandemic Legion 18463	Posted - 2016.12.04 17:55:36 - [12] - Quote Dior Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: T3 are the problem for lot of ship groups even after the nerfs. What if we would give them 1 subsystem slot that could give either attack, defense or speed bonuses? No more switching during combat. Would that help? Even easier than that. Give them t1 destroyer stats, not bonkers level.
Robert Caldera Caldera Trading and Investment 1221	Posted - 2016.12.05 12:51:18 - [13] - Quote yep, delete T3D from the game. There was no point of adding them, zero.
Lugh Crow-Slave 3364	Posted - 2016.12.06 12:23:38 - [14] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: T3 are the problem for lot of ship groups even after the nerfs. What if we would give them 1 subsystem slot that could give either attack, defense or speed bonuses? No more switching during combat. Would that help? Even easier than that. Give them t1 destroyer stats, not bonkers level. i think this would work let all of the benefit come from the pilots management of the roles BLOPS Hauler
Brown Pathfinder Its a good day to die 16	Posted - 2016.12.06 14:54:01 - [15] - Quote Could look at how current t1 frigs are bonused and build upon that? Then also add t3 battleships and industrials and capitals, melted nanoribbons are barely worth the effort to farm these days and need some kind of buff to increase their value I think people complaining about t3's being OP haven't looked at other t1 and t2 ship classes wich haven't even seen rebalancing yet wich affects alot of other areas.
SurrenderMonkey Space Llama Industries 2821	Posted - 2016.12.06 16:40:30 - [16] - Quote Conogan Blitzkreig wrote: Man something needs t o be done abouts the resources they require to build... Or something...cuz their prices right now are bs.... They should cost an average of 4 mil since they are below cruisers, not no 25 mil, double the price of cruisers. Yeah, one whole ratting tick (if you're a baddy) is a real wallet-buster. "Help, I'm bored with missions!" http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
Merchant Rova Pathway to the Next 110	Posted - 2016.12.07 14:49:11 - [17] - Quote Kenrailae wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: no more that 25% total(5% per level) and i personally like this HOWEVER i'm against it because there has to be a better way to fix these then giving them one of the only balanced flavorings of a T3 Delete T3D's. AF's fixed. AF's were bad before T3D's were even ingame. T3D's were the nail in the coffin.
Kenrailae mind games. Suddenly Spaceships. 669	Posted - 2016.12.07 16:38:59 - [18] - Quote Merchant Rova wrote: Kenrailae wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: no more that 25% total(5% per level) and i personally like this HOWEVER i'm against it because there has to be a better way to fix these then giving them one of the only balanced flavorings of a T3 Delete T3D's. AF's fixed. AF's were bad before T3D's were even ingame. T3D's were the nail in the coffin. No they weren't. A few were. A few of everything always are bad. As a class though, AF's were in a pretty decent place, again making provision for the few that still needed help. The Law is a point of View The NPE IS a big deal
Lugh Crow-Slave 3375	Posted - 2016.12.07 17:02:38 - [19] - Quote Merchant Rova wrote: Kenrailae wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: no more that 25% total(5% per level) and i personally like this HOWEVER i'm against it because there has to be a better way to fix these then giving them one of the only balanced flavorings of a T3 Delete T3D's. AF's fixed. AF's were bad before T3D's were even ingame. T3D's were the nail in the coffin. i used the hawk quit a bit BLOPS Hauler
baltec1 Bat Country Pandemic Legion 18475	Posted - 2016.12.08 00:03:05 - [20] - Quote Merchant Rova wrote: Kenrailae wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: no more that 25% total(5% per level) and i personally like this HOWEVER i'm against it because there has to be a better way to fix these then giving them one of the only balanced flavorings of a T3 Delete T3D's. AF's fixed. AF's were bad before T3D's were even ingame. T3D's were the nail in the coffin. AF were some of the most popular ships in FW and harpies were used as a fleet doctrine. T3D invalidated a lot of ship classes when they hit (still do).

Azazel The Misanthrope Oblivion Watch HYDRA RELOADED 122	Posted - 2017.02.09 15:41:11 - [21] - Quote I honestly don't like the heat reduction bonuses on T3's and I think that they would be better suited for T2 ships anyway.
Cristl 533	Posted - 2017.02.09 18:59:57 - [22] - Quote T3D's need a nerf, there's no two ways about it. Keep the mode switch, that's cool, but their baseline stats need reducing. Imagine a Corax fighting a T3D, and pretend the Corax pilot could select the T3D's mode. He still wouldn't have a chance, and that's skewed. Obviously, the Corax needs some general help too..., but you get my point.
Kenrailae Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships. 724	Posted - 2017.02.09 19:07:48 - [23] - Quote Nah, the Corax just needs CCP to release the Eve Online: Oceans expansion and then it'd be just fine. The Law is a point of View The NPE IS a big deal
Azazel The Misanthrope Oblivion Watch HYDRA RELOADED 122	Posted - 2017.02.14 22:45:22 - [24] - Quote Cristl wrote: T3D's need a nerf, there's no two ways about it. Keep the mode switch, that's cool, but their baseline stats need reducing. Imagine a Corax fighting a T3D, and pretend the Corax pilot could select the T3D's mode. He still wouldn't have a chance, and that's skewed. Obviously, the Corax needs some general help too..., but you get my point. The Corax is by far the worst ship in EVE. Corvettes are more fun.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.