EVE Search - Best and Worst thing about EvE..

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Best and Worst thing about EvE..

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Gadget Helmsdottir Gadget's Workshop 552	Posted - 2016.12.12 18:52:07 - [31] - Quote The best thing about EvE, is that I can do pretty much whatever I want. It supports most play-styles, and shifting between them can be seamless, or even done in tandem with enough alts. The worst thing about EvE, is that I can do pretty much whatever I want... There's never enough time for all that. --Conflicted Gadget Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."
Soel Reit Dambusters 617 Sq 305	Posted - 2016.12.12 19:02:42 - [32] - Quote can't you post all in a single thread? so i have to click on the like only 1 time? ty Lazy Boy
Keno Skir 1065	Posted - 2016.12.12 19:16:14 - [33] - Quote 2Sonas1Cup wrote: Solution to time dilation is instances and proxied servers. Too much for CCP I guess. Something that blizzard has been doing for a decade now. Blizzard made a bad game, no need to copy it in any way. <Gùï> 250,000 Bonus SP when you start an Alpha Clone HERE <Gùï> Including ISK Bonus & In Game Assistance - Piracy / Wormhole Space / Covops PvP
Krima Sumyungi Perkone Caldari State 3	Posted - 2016.12.12 22:17:33 - [34] - Quote 2Sonas1Cup wrote: Solution to time dilation is instances and proxied servers. Too much for CCP I guess. Something that blizzard has been doing for a decade now. Even better, crappy old Funcom invented and implemented instancing while developing Anarchy Online years before Blizzard even considered making WoW. Norwegian Nords > Icelandic Nords.
Khergit Deserters Crom's Angels 4743	Posted - 2016.12.13 02:36:32 - [35] - Quote You see, some game designs reward strategy, such as the hard work and admin grunt work required to get a huge amount of ships (ISKs) all together, at exactly the same place, at exactly the same time. Seems kind of tricky, and before that tedious, no? Just saying from the popcorn stand. No involvement, no favorite side. But the topic was about Best and Worst thing in Eve, so had to think and compare to the other MMO alternatives.... Start the bubble machine! -Lawrence Welk
Gogela Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance 3373	Posted - 2016.12.13 03:19:32 - [36] - Quote Xayder wrote: best : suicide ganking worst : suicide ganking I suicide gank... so I should disclose that. Best Those players that are stable (mentally) and are having fun in the game. Doesn't matter what activity it is at all. They are talking about what they do and helping others along. They are the content generators. They are having good, friendly interactions with everyone. They add to the game experience. Worst The players that are negative and d-bags just to be d-bags. These are the players you absolutely know have highly dysfunctional minds, careers, and relationships in the real world. You know them when you meet them, and you know who you are. In a game about the players, it is ultimately the players that define and personify the answer to this question, imho. Signatures should be used responsibly...
Herzog Wolfhammer Sigma Special Tactics Group 8075	Posted - 2016.12.13 07:27:12 - [37] - Quote best: When a ganker rages after a fail/loss worst: when you realize you spent time dealing with them and wrestling with a pig in the mud means that you are both covered in filth but the pig is happy. (then you realize that "The CODE. always wins" is based on them getting you to PVP with them when you were not initially interested). Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Wallstreet J0urnal Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 2	Posted - 2016.12.13 08:01:01 - [38] - Quote Best thing: Male Strippers Worst: probe launcher
Salvos Rhoska 1673	Posted - 2016.12.13 11:04:13 - [39] - Quote Cynically, it can be said that there isnt much incentive for CCP to upgrade their servers for bigger fights. If 5000+ prople are willing to slog through that mess and Tidi as is there must be something they enjoy about it. Hard to argue with 5000+ peoples choice. And if more people decide not to show up for big fights cos of tidi etc, then there is less server load, and again, less incentive to upgrade them. PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Satchel Darkmatter Massive Dynamic inc. Care Factor 29	Posted - 2016.12.13 11:23:26 - [40] - Quote not sure its something they enjoy more like something they feel they NEED to do to stay relevant.
Taishoku Mayaki Black Scorpions Inc Circle-Of-Two 6241	Posted - 2016.12.13 11:26:20 - [41] - Quote Best:- Wars. Worse:- War Dec system. No one uses it but Jita Campers. "Right-O, lets get undocked and see what falls off the ship"
xxxTRUSTxxx Galactic Rangers EVEolution. 560	Posted - 2016.12.13 11:31:25 - [42] - Quote keepstar down, billions lost, could have been worse, no different then when an FC makes a call on saving a single ship vs getting everything blapped. defenders decided to let them grind and kill it while they got their stuff out. sometimes you just have to cut and run. no drama, a dissapointment for sure, but meh, if i had a million isk for everytime an FC said nope, not engaging that and retreated i wouldn't have a wallet big enough to hold it all lol. best thing about EVE - it's EVE worst thing about EVE - still not mobile in this day and age.
Alphea Abbra Project Promethion 871	Posted - 2016.12.15 22:18:03 - [43] - Quote Remiel Pollard wrote: Logan Revelore wrote: Solution to time dilation is p2p netcode mixed in with the current server-client netcode. Peer to peer for EVE? Get out Peer to play? Pay to Peer?
Izchadie Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 5	Posted - 2016.12.15 22:20:51 - [44] - Quote Best thing: I play it. Worst thing: I live in it.
Judaa K'Marr Power-Hug Training Bootcamp 54	Posted - 2016.12.16 05:06:44 - [45] - Quote Satchel Darkmatter wrote: not sure its something they enjoy more like something they feel they NEED to do to stay relevant. This is probably true. Also, if someone attends the tidi fight for this stupid reason, they deserve the experience they get.
March rabbit Mosquito squadron The-Culture 1989	Posted - 2016.12.16 05:54:22 - [46] - Quote Sonya Corvinus wrote: Massive fleet fights are by far the most boring PvP in EVE (outside of HS ganking). For the life of me I don't know why people do it. Get out of HS, out of null and do small gang work in LS and WHs. The only problem with 'small gang work in LS and WH' is that no one notices when you finally leave the game. One less visit of annoying small gang per week or something even less meaningful. At the same time big empires clashing in 0.0 are remembered for years.... And some time some people even write books 'Empires of Eve' To each their own. The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Rain6637 NulzSec 34574	Posted - 2016.12.16 07:21:38 - [47] - Quote I remember my first player event where I experienced tidi. I concluded the only way to make EVE less fun was to play it at a reduced speed represented by a percentage. This is the percentage of normal fun you are having right now Help, I can't download EVE President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
Salvos Rhoska 1695	Posted - 2016.12.16 09:57:52 - [48] - Quote March rabbit wrote: The only problem with 'small gang work in LS and WH' is that no one notices when you finally leave the game. One less visit of annoying small gang per week or something even less meaningful. At the same time big empires clashing in 0.0 are remembered for years.... And some time some people even write books 'Empires of Eve' To each their own. Yeah but Im sure those involved in smaller fighs 'member them for years, and those fights change the tapestry and future of LS and WHs too. PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Deck Cadelanne CAStabouts 386	Posted - 2016.12.16 12:20:52 - [49] - Quote 2Sonas1Cup wrote: Solution to time dilation is instances and proxied servers. Too much for CCP I guess. Something that blizzard has been doing for a decade now. Yes, yes, the old "change the game to something totally different" BS. *"When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional."* - Hunter S. Thompson
Lord Ra Section XII The Southern Querious Drug Cartel 116	Posted - 2016.12.16 13:44:19 - [50] - Quote Best Thing About EVE:Years of entertainment Worst Thing About EVE:Not enough people know about it
Algarion Getz Aideron Corp 257	Posted - 2016.12.16 15:15:50 - [51] - Quote Salvos Rhoska wrote: Dont go to the big fight if you dont enjoy it. CCP is not technically dishonest in promising them, they are just technically limited in providing for them. With Keepstars proliferating, this is what you can expect, everytime. Just dont participate. If you dont enjoy it, dont do it. Well, if you build expensive structures you have to participate. Huge expensive structures promote giant TIDI battles. Like KillahBee said in the video, why use expensive capital ships, when you can just use thousands of cheap subcaps? Deploying thousands of cheap shuttles to cause TIDI and make the battle unfun is an exploit and will get you banned in notime. Deploying thousands of players in cheap ships to cause TIDI and make the battle unfun is considerd good strategy and will get you fame and lots of positive attention. I know the comparison is flawed, because gathering thousands of players requires a lot more effort, but the end result is the same: Massive TIDI and unfun battles. Should the future battles for expensive structures really be decided by who has the biggest alpha corp? (i.e. Pandemic Horde has over 10,000 players)
Logan Revelore Symbiotic Systems 89	Posted - 2016.12.16 23:46:23 - [52] - Quote Alphea Abbra wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Logan Revelore wrote: Solution to time dilation is p2p netcode mixed in with the current server-client netcode. Peer to peer for EVE? Get out Peer to play? Pay to Peer? Peer-to-Peer.
Bumblefck Kerensky Initiatives 13295	Posted - 2016.12.17 03:49:34 - [53] - Quote Toobo wrote: While Toobo was spinning slots at 27m ISK per spin No offence, but do you really have to wheedle gambling into pretty much each and every one of your posts? Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi . Bumble's Space Log
March rabbit Mosquito squadron The-Culture 1993	Posted - 2016.12.17 09:57:03 - [54] - Quote Bumblefck wrote: Toobo wrote: While Toobo was spinning slots at 27m ISK per spin No offence, but do you really have to wheedle gambling into pretty much each and every one of your posts? As he said gambling was his main Eve for last couple years (i can be wrong about time slope). I think he needs some time to get used to live without it. The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Salvos Rhoska 1698	Posted - 2016.12.17 10:21:13 - [55] - Quote Algarion Getz wrote: Well, if you build expensive structures you have to participate. You dont "have" to. You choose to. Especially if you yourself personally dont have anything invested in it. PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.