Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Exiled Wolf
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:16:00 -
[1]
I hope CCP will design more... everyone loves new "toys". What kind of ship would you like to see?
Personally, I would love to see another destroyer class or a battleship sized faction mining ship.
|

Marquis Dean
Indigo Fade
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:18:00 -
[2]
What new ships?
--- Indigo Fade is now selling jumpclones for superb prices, please see Marquis Dean's bio and/or evemail/convo him ingame.
|

Lars Intarestum
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:22:00 -
[3]
First I'd like to see new commandships using the new models. The Hurricane is just begging to be used as a commandship.
I'd also like to see more T1 stuff. Add a Tier 4 Frigate and Cruiser to the mix. Expand each race's "alternate" fighting styles. Minimatar and Amarr might get drone/missile ships, Gallente might get a gunboat with a tanking bonus, Caldari might get a raw damage boat or two.
Just something to expand options while still maintaining a sembelance of coherency if that's at all possible.
Plus, letting newbies fly the new ships earlier might increase kewl factor.
|

n0thing
Northern Intelligence Artificial Intelligence.
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:27:00 -
[4]
No please, command ships would not look good with new models. I personaly dont like symmetrical(or whatever its spelled) ships. Its space, symmetry needed when theres air.... ---
|

Horza Otho
Minmatar Infortunatus Eventus
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:30:00 -
[5]
I'd love support BS's. Remote Rep bonus, Power xfer bonus, Shield xfer bonus etc, and include above moderate resists but very few meds/lows to fit tanking.
I'd also _really_ love tier 2 destroyers, or maybe veen a cruiser sized destroyer.
|

Marduk Felzhen
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:32:00 -
[6]
new ships? get me some of what you're smoking right now!
|

Jei'son Bladesmith
Bladesmith Mining and Development Consortium
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:44:00 -
[7]
I'd murder for a command ship version of the Hurricane. But it must be painted jet black and named a "Tsunami" Then I shall buy one and win EVE.
I'm all for new ships, even if theyre similar in attributes to what already exists - some ships like the Dominix are excellent in terms of stats, but their hull designs need much love...its a giant forehead. Gimme somethin sexy dammit. ☼☼☼ Life's a *****, then you get podded ☼☼☼
|

Dangerously Cheesey
Anqara Expeditions The OSS
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 20:59:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Jei'son Bladesmith I'd murder for a command ship version of the Hurricane. But it must be painted jet black and named a "Tsunami" Then I shall buy one and win EVE.
I'm all for new ships, even if theyre similar in attributes to what already exists - some ships like the Dominix are excellent in terms of stats, but their hull designs need much love...its a giant forehead. Gimme somethin sexy dammit.
How DARE you mock the mighty Shoe! All power and glory to the Shoe!
The problem with a sick looking command ship variant of the cane is that it would look so amazing that no one would fly anything else!
|

xenodia
Gallente RONA Corporation RONA Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 21:03:00 -
[9]
Faction or T2 domi please.
http://www.eve-ronacorp.com RONA Corp is Recruiting |

Sheriff Jones
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 21:10:00 -
[10]
Originally by: n0thing No please, command ships would not look good with new models. I personaly dont like symmetrical(or whatever its spelled) ships. Its space, symmetry needed when theres air....
Well, planetary flight is coming 
Originally by: Curzon Dax 1. I am not singing Ducktales.
|
|

Shadowsword
Kermit Space Industies
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 21:16:00 -
[11]
Originally by: n0thing No please, command ships would not look good with new models. I personaly dont like symmetrical(or whatever its spelled) ships. Its space, symmetry needed when theres air....
From a Rp perspective, symetry is easier to design and build. There's no logical reasons for the ship builders to build widely asymetric ships.
------------------------------------------ A big nuke may be nice in a strategy game, but something like this in a game where every unit is a player, and each death costly, is insane. |

Marduk Felzhen
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 21:26:00 -
[12]
what eve needs are transformer ships. Think voltron, but instead, of tigers they're ships. so like the dominix could be head, a naglfar could be the torso, arms would be a bunch of cruisers and hands would be frigs, legs would be i dunno, two hypes positioned vertically, and the thorax would be the.....yknow....
|

Gladiator Jonny
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 21:30:00 -
[13]
lol, arnt transformers 1 robot that turns into ships/animals etc. Not a fleet of battleships and dreds ^-^'' cant say ive seen transformers in a long time but it would be **** funny if you could merg titans 
|

Marcus Druallis
Quantum Industries Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 22:47:00 -
[14]
Originally by: n0thing No please, command ships would not look good with new models. I personaly dont like symmetrical(or whatever its spelled) ships. Its space, symmetry needed when theres air....
Take a look, every single existing command ship is pretty much symmetrical... --
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes - Devil ([email protected]) |

Marduk Felzhen
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 23:24:00 -
[15]
Its weird because it seems when they designed bc's they made it a rule of thumb that it should be symmetrical. I believe BC's are the only ship type that has symmetry consistent among all four races (that and industrials. In my opinion i prefer symmetrical ships.
|

Jayne Tamm
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 23:31:00 -
[16]
i personally think they shud add another wing to the scorpion!! i mean...a scorpion has 2 pincers...and the ship only has 1( the wing), so give it another wing and all will be fine...and it would look like a damn good ship then too.
cant wait for ccp to implement high res!!! these ships are gona look the nuts then!! as if my hyperion didnt already look awesome! 
|

xHalcyonx
Amarr EmpiresMod
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 23:41:00 -
[17]
Edited by: xHalcyonx on 11/04/2007 23:37:02
Originally by: Jei'son Bladesmith I'd murder for a command ship version of the Hurricane. But it must be painted jet black and named a "Tsunami" Then I shall buy one and win EVE.
It has to go with the name of the Sleipnir, my vote goes to Hraesvelg.
|

Terianna Eri
Amarr STK Scientific Rule of Three
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 10:35:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Terianna Eri on 12/04/2007 10:31:53
Originally by: Marduk Felzhen Its weird because it seems when they designed bc's they made it a rule of thumb that it should be symmetrical. I believe BC's are the only ship type that has symmetry consistent among all four races (that and industrials. In my opinion i prefer symmetrical ships.
ferox is only mostly symmetrical afaik :) http://izlin.free.fr/eve/ships/ferox_2.jpg the wing on the starboard size is tilted down and may not be of the same length. __________________________________ <-- Behold, the eve-o forums |

Raekone
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 10:42:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Sheriff Jones
Originally by: n0thing No please, command ships would not look good with new models. I personaly dont like symmetrical(or whatever its spelled) ships. Its space, symmetry needed when theres air....
Well, planetary flight is coming 
If that ever happens I'll literally eat my hat. Or at elast take a sizable bite from it.
|

Deathbarrage
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 10:46:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Lars Intarestum First I'd like to see new commandships using the new models. The Hurricane is just begging to be used as a commandship.
I'd also like to see more T1 stuff. Add a Tier 4 Frigate and Cruiser to the mix. Expand each race's "alternate" fighting styles. Minimatar and Amarr might get drone/missile ships, Gallente might get a gunboat with a tanking bonus, Caldari might get a raw damage boat or two.
Just something to expand options while still maintaining a sembelance of coherency if that's at all possible.
Plus, letting newbies fly the new ships earlier might increase kewl factor.
*cough* hyperion *cough*
gallente already has it all
|
|

errorist
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 10:58:00 -
[21]
Originally by: xenodia Faction or T2 domi please.
couldent aggre more :P introduce Navy versions of the tier 1 bs's 
|

n0thing
Northern Intelligence Artificial Intelligence.
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 11:13:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Marcus Druallis
Originally by: n0thing No please, command ships would not look good with new models. I personaly dont like symmetrical(or whatever its spelled) ships. Its space, symmetry needed when theres air....
Take a look, every single existing command ship is pretty much symmetrical...
Well at least gallente one doesnt look like a big flying wing Moreover, if they would need to switch hull class then stats need to be buffed up to even greater level, wich would result in something that would out-tank everything non-capital.
Actually new ships are nice, but each of them need a proper class and role, for example now when T2 destroyers are out, they to my view completly outclass AFs and make them lack their role. Similar happens to HACs with Tier 2 BCs. Perhaps BCs and Destoryers need a racial skill then to make training for them extended since right now its easier to get into dictor then into properly fitted af.
Should be looking like this: ----Inty-------AF---Dictor-----HAC--CS Frig----Destroyer---Cruiser----BC-------BS
prolly a rough graph, but right now HACs and AFs are way down to their lower class. ---
|

Telkanes Serkant
Caldari Raddick Explorations NxT LeveL
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 11:15:00 -
[23]
Id love another Cruiser for tech1 just an alternate play style! (experimental cruisers like an amarr Missile boat!)
-Telk
|

WYLEE C0Y0TE
Caldari State War Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 11:22:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Telkanes Serkant Id love another Cruiser for tech1 just an alternate play style! (experimental cruisers like an amarr Missile boat!)
I'd like to see new cruisers as well actually.....
Originally by: Kaylee Zara Try it out yourself and see what you think rather than listening to what the sheep army thinks.
Originally by: Leikeze Mrotserif If it's personal, it's because of you.
|

Lrrp
Minmatar Gallente Mercantile Exchange
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 13:22:00 -
[25]
Lets face it, the most symetrical ship in Eve is.........the Phoon. Ugly, but sweetly uniform. 
|

Marquis Dean
Indigo Fade
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 13:54:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Lrrp Lets face it, the most symetrical ship in Eve is.........the Phoon. Ugly, but sweetly uniform. 

--- Indigo Fade is now selling jumpclones for superb prices, please see Marquis Dean's bio and/or evemail/convo him ingame.
|

kill0rbunny
Alpha-Hirogen The Pentagram
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 14:20:00 -
[27]
I want a black drake with an insane passive tank that everybody wants to nerf. 
Pew Pew!
|

Phoenicia
Eidolon Exploration and Exploitation
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 14:49:00 -
[28]
Spinal mounted weapon-ships! Cruiser-sized, able to damage dreads & slow BSes.
Caldari for example, would get the um.... "Robin" (Okay it's not awe-inspiring fearness, but I'm going with the bird-theme!).
3 Hislots, 1 missileslot, 2 gunslots 6 Midslots 4 Lowslots
99.5% reduction in citadel launcher powergrid use.
Caldari cruiser bonus: 10% railgun range per level, 5% shield resists per level
For the model I'm thinking a huge launcher with engines welded on.
For the Amarrians I'm thinking Homeworld-like Ion Frigates.
For the Gallente, "Big Bertha" if they want blasters/rails. Or possibly a cruiser-sized ship that can carry 2 fighters.
And for our Minny friends. Another "Big Bertha" 
|

Megan Maynard
Minmatar RONA Deepspace
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:02:00 -
[29]
Originally by: n0thing No please, command ships would not look good with new models. I personaly dont like symmetrical(or whatever its spelled) ships. Its space, symmetry needed when theres air....
What? You realize this is a game.
|

Chris97b
Caldari Nine Hundred Souls The Kano Organisation
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:33:00 -
[30]
Dedicated salvage ships. I personally would love to see a destroyer or cruiser variant with a salvaging bonus, and 4-5 high slots, with no turret or launcher hardpoints.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |