| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Pociomundo
Gallente
World Order
The Imperial Order
   |
Posted - 2007.04.12 15:01:00 -
[31]
I hope Queen News has been banned already.
|
Dregann
Amarr Trading Company
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:05:00 -
[32]
If only i was 18...
|
Splagada
Minmatar
Tides of Silence
Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:59:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Splagada on 12/04/2007 16:55:06
what about my 130 alts 1man corp? :p
------
Relaxed corp recruiting |
Flinx Evenstar
Minmatar
Momentum.
Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:20:00 -
[34]
 Originally by: Asylum Seaker
So far as I can tell.. Serathu is saying:
a) They are aware of alt corps
b) They can't do anything about them because some people have valid 1 person corps
c) Posts that are trolling or flaming will be moderated like they always have been
So whats everyone so happy about?
He means that 1 man corps specifically created to post in the CAOD forum (ie those with no in game activity) are going to be treated slightly different to the 1 man corps that are valid (ie those with in game history) and are usually infrequent posters.
It's not really that hard to spot the difference 
You may have noticed the lack of useless threads posted recently, so my guess is it's working 
|
Flapp
Dog Tags
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 23:28:00 -
[35]
2 man corp here, including an alt of mine...
In my opinion there is absolutely no need for more regulations. Instead, maybe players should be reminded on how to deal with the problem themselves - just blow someone to smithereens if you don't like him. :)
We ain't got macro miners or Privateers or AAA (arrogant alliance... holes) for no reason. In fact we created them, or in other words we just let it happen.
It is up to us - the players - to put a hold to spamming and to restore CAOD.
If you want more moderation, limits and shiitsnotz head over to WoW.
kthxbye.
|
Rthor
Gallente
Smugglers Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 03:02:00 -
[36]
Edited by: Rthor on 13/04/2007 03:03:27
I am in a 1 man corp. Average skillpoints in my corp is upwards of 50M so I think it is a pretty high quality corporation. I understand what you are trying to do but I don't want to get warnings just because I am in a 1 man corp.
I don't really like any alliances so I will say smart things that undermine them but I think that this is fair game by me.
|
|
Serathu
Forum Moderator
Interstellar Services Department
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 03:44:00 -
[37]
To clarify since people seem to be a touch confused:
The point of my post is to answer the concerns that many have raised regarding the use of 1-person corporations to troll and flame in this forum and avoid the alt-posting rules.
These posts fall under the existing trolling and flaming rules. There is no rule change being made here. 1-person corporations will not be treated differently to 1000-person corporations with regards to their right to post here and the way in which their posts will be dealt with.
The key is that I am asking you, the EVE Forum users, to be more active in notifying us of any trolling/flaming posts so that we can deal with them quickly.
In addition, I am asking that people cease posting trolling/flaming replies in response to posts from 1-person corporations. Trolling/flaming any forum user is unacceptable and will be dealt with accordingly.
|
|
Gunship
Amarr
FATAL REVELATIONS
FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 07:59:00 -
[38]
If one man corps can post here like "Q news", then frankly we need an Alliance only forum please. I would like to see other restrictions, like at least 100 members in the alliance that posts, but appriciate that this may actualy require the MODS to do an ingame lookup, hope that would not be too much trouble.
from a game play perspective these alt posts stops the real players from posting something news worthy, since the alts do nothing but, so any news worthy reports are pointless when a flame thread already exists and over time many simply do not even bother comming here.
So you want to join us? |
Max Teranous
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 08:34:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Gunship
If one man corps can post here like "Q news", then frankly we need an Alliance only forum please. I would like to see other restrictions, like at least 100 members in the alliance that posts, but appriciate that this may actualy require the MODS to do an ingame lookup, hope that would not be too much trouble.
An alliance only forum would not work. 1 bil is not much and 1 person would create an alt alliance and offer to have any 1 man alt corps join it for a very small fee. Thus it's not a solution.
Max 
--------------------
|
Ashraaf
Infinite Improbability Inc
Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 09:33:00 -
[40]
if it's possible on this board (not all
let the 3 caracter appear, so Alt, Spy... won't post. Or they buy an account just to post.
|
Taurequis
Waylander 01
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 10:46:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Taurequis on 13/04/2007 10:42:47
Originally by: Max Teranous
Originally by: Gunship
If one man corps can post here like "Q news", then frankly we need an Alliance only forum please. I would like to see other restrictions, like at least 100 members in the alliance that posts, but appriciate that this may actualy require the MODS to do an ingame lookup, hope that would not be too much trouble.
An alliance only forum would not work. 1 bil is not much and 1 person would create an alt alliance and offer to have any 1 man alt corps join it for a very small fee. Thus it's not a solution.
You beat me too that post. 
I really like posting here and feel since ive had a good couple of years at the top level of large alliance play i have a little something to contribute from time to time.
This is the corps and alliance discussion forums too.
Frankly in the longer context of the way this board has been managed the current forum is a better, less spammy, less nasty, more interesting place to read now then it ever was in the last 4 years, in my opinion.
So i guess - well done the mods.
Best Regards,
Taur
p.s This is my 54 mil sp main, i'm in a 3 person corp, my two pvp alts are in other corps in 0.0 alliances.
|
King Fury
Caldari
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 11:03:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Gunship
If one man corps can post here like "Q news", then frankly we need an Alliance only forum please. I would like to see other restrictions, like at least 100 members in the alliance that posts, but appriciate that this may actualy require the MODS to do an ingame lookup, hope that would not be too much trouble.
from a game play perspective these alt posts stops the real players from posting something news worthy, since the alts do nothing but, so any news worthy reports are pointless when a flame thread already exists and over time many simply do not even bother comming here.
Arent you looking through rose coloured glasses? Members of corps smack/troll and flame as much as noobs/1 man alt corps. The smack in the past at the height was from alliances and corps. ie BoB, LV, D2, an alt may post one flame however the corps and alliances post hundreds.
Not sure what the solution is, but doesnt everyone deserve a voice, otherwise censorship wins 
|
Gunship
Amarr
FATAL REVELATIONS
FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 12:50:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Max Teranous
Originally by: Gunship
If one man corps can post here like "Q news", then frankly we need an Alliance only forum please. I would like to see other restrictions, like at least 100 members in the alliance that posts, but appriciate that this may actualy require the MODS to do an ingame lookup, hope that would not be too much trouble.
An alliance only forum would not work. 1 bil is not much and 1 person would create an alt alliance and offer to have any 1 man alt corps join it for a very small fee. Thus it's not a solution.
Indeed, thats why the alliance must have 100 members in it as well. This is not hard to check buy the admins.
So you want to join us? |
Redbad
Minmatar
Be Inspired Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 13:38:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Redbad on 13/04/2007 13:35:05
"The idiot always finds a smart way to bypass all that is normal."
Whatever you think of, garbageposts shall appear on these forums, but if you can differentiate between posts of idiots and posts of value, these forums still hold quality posts and threads that add atmosphere to this game.
And thats what EVE is, .... a game! Remeber it!
join us today! |
Gunship
Amarr
FATAL REVELATIONS
FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 13:38:00 -
[45]
Originally by: King Fury
Not sure what the solution is, but doesnt everyone deserve a voice, otherwise censorship wins
NO, imo they can post in all the other forums. That way I and others can hopefully just read the post that matters, without spending ages reading past Alt posts.
So you want to join us? |
Chowdown
Gallente
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 15:16:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Gunship
Originally by: King Fury
Not sure what the solution is, but doesnt everyone deserve a voice, otherwise censorship wins
NO, imo they can post in all the other forums. That way I and others can hopefully just read the post that matters, without spending ages reading past Alt posts.
You found something of value in COAD, where? I don't beleive it.
http://www.eve-battlestars.net/chow.html
|
Rthor
Gallente
Smugglers Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 16:23:00 -
[47]
I am not surprised that alliance honchos want to now get rid of 1 player corps posting in CAOD. It is pretty much how they are about trying to get rid of 1 man corps from "their" space. But really alliances are any small corp's enemy because they tell us where we can or cannot go. So I feel it is fair game to go to "their" CAOD and help alliances fall by exposing their weaknesses. What are they going to ask for next? If I go to 0.0 I cannot shoot back because I am in a 1 man corp?
|
Marla Durden
Princeps Corp
YouWhat
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 16:23:00 -
[48]
Can ISD reveal other characters on same account?
If a character posting here is the main character of the account, moderator can let him hide his other characters, a noob alt will never post if that put in risk his real id. Freighter or scientific (2nd accounts) that try to bypass empire wars will never post revealing his political opinion. If 2nd account alt post and main is revealed perhaps he find his Obelisk ganked in hi sec next time
It's easy to check who is a "main character" with the amount of SP.
|
snake101
The Taining corp
Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 16:40:00 -
[49]
how about a 1 man corp that started the day it posted and the ceo is the same 1 day old then 3 days after the posted the corp and char is gone?
|
Rthor
Gallente
Smugglers Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 16:42:00 -
[50]
Originally by: snake101
how about a 1 man corp that started the day it posted and the ceo is the same 1 day old then 3 days after the posted the corp and char is gone?
These are your alliance mates.
|
thetwilitehour
Omega Enterprises
Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 17:43:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Serathu
To clarify since people seem to be a touch confused:
The point of my post is to answer the concerns that many have raised regarding the use of 1-person corporations to troll and flame in this forum and avoid the alt-posting rules.
These posts fall under the existing trolling and flaming rules. There is no rule change being made here
Please just change the rules. If you really want to protect "important" 1 man corporations, just require the corp to exist for 3 months before it can post here.
|
mazzilliu
Caldari
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 17:52:00 -
[52]
in all honesty i liked the OLD rules better that allowed newb corp members to post.
that way i can tell at a glance wether someone is using an alt, or is much more likely to be a main. the "you have to make a corp now" rule is no barrier at all. just give up on that.
also people who just recently got kicked from a corp still cant post under these rules.
Demon Womb 0.0 NPCing corp is now open for business. 0.0 access for 20% corp tax! Join now! |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 23:06:00 -
[53]
Down with 1-man corps!!
Keep up the great work Serathu + others <3
Help me help you. |
|
Flinx Evenstar
Minmatar
Momentum.
Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.04.14 02:30:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Rthor
So I feel it is fair game to go to "their" CAOD and help alliances fall by exposing their weaknesses. What are they going to ask for next? If I go to 0.0 I cannot shoot back because I am in a 1 man corp?
 You can bring your 1 man corp to 0.0 anytime you want mate
But most of the guys we are refering to in this thread dont even undock. They were created to post on a forum just to bypass the alt rule. Is that so hard to understand
|
Rthor
Gallente
Smugglers Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.14 03:54:00 -
[55]
Thanks!!!
The point is that all you have to do to solve this problem in a proportional way is to tell your alliance mates to not make 1 man corps for posting purposes and all they have to do is to listen to you. But instead of doing that (which you cannot do only because of your weakness) you choose to lobby CCP to ban 1 man corps from posting.
First of all, that would not be a proportional response to a problem, and second this is actually a problem created by alliances so I do not even have anything to do with creating it so I should not be punished for what you guys are doing in any way.
So I am saying, and I know that they are not doing it yet, CCP do not think about making this rule because it is not right. If CCP wants to do this because they dont feel like moderating as much any more then that is their choice for the direction of the game and it is fine and adaptable.
But I just do not want to hear this lobbying by alliances about how this is the correct path. This game is not about CCP protecting us from various things (like scamming, ship loss, corp theft) so why should we demand from them to protect us from having to read bull**** in CAOD. You are ultimate carebears for asking for this. I mean if you see a corpless guy named yomama134 posting that D2 is dead and you believe it and quit the game as a result without any light bulbs in your brain going off that maybe you should not believe everything that you read in CAOD then CCP will not help you succeed in Eve with this rule.
It is a principle and it is a game but I understand if you do not get it and it is OK too.
|
Rasterman Ganja
Minmatar
GanjaCorp Security Services
|
Posted - 2007.04.14 14:29:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Chribba
Down with 1-man corps!!
Keep up the great work Serathu + others <3
I agree!! Hail, the rise of the 2-man corp!!
Seriously, nice try, but I doubt it'll help. Software solutions are the key.
|
Raivi
Explosion Matrix
|
Posted - 2007.04.14 16:10:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Raivi on 14/04/2007 16:06:48
This is only partly connected with the issue of 1 man alt corps, but would it be possible to put in place a rule against obviously trying to impersonate another character? Even though they're usually pretty obvious it's quite annoying and serves no constructive purpose.
Example: Orange Speceis
A specific rule in place to stop that would be a fairly simple and useful change.
Explosion Matrix: Nostrum Nomen est Ridiculum |
Deja Nay
|
Posted - 2007.04.15 11:28:00 -
[58]
When i played starwars galaxies they had a very effective way of clearing the forum of the trolls and and flamers, it was simple if you get banned from the forums youre ingame account gets suspended aswell it could also be perma banned if you did something really bad.
|
Jotan Veer
HUN Corp.
|
Posted - 2007.04.15 20:41:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Deja Nay
When i played starwars galaxies they had a very effective way of clearing the forum of the trolls and and flamers, it was simple if you get banned from the forums youre ingame account gets suspended aswell it could also be perma banned if you did something really bad.
Bad like....hmm posting without corp and alliance tickers showing?
|
|
Serathu
Forum Moderator
Interstellar Services Department
|
Posted - 2007.04.15 21:20:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Raivi
Edited by: Raivi on 14/04/2007 16:06:48
This is only partly connected with the issue of 1 man alt corps, but would it be possible to put in place a rule against obviously trying to impersonate another character? Even though they're usually pretty obvious it's quite annoying and serves no constructive purpose.
*snip specifics*
A specific rule in place to stop that would be a fairly simple and useful change.
Please read the Forum Rules, specifically item 15. Email us with a link to the offending posts so that we can take any necessary action.
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |