Mortim
Minmatar
Madison Industrial Co.
Sylph Alliance
   |
Posted - 2007.05.06 01:30:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Kabajashi San
To Euclarid:
There are neutrals to UK. Yet our purpose doesn't allow us to use the term "neutral" in such broad sense as other alliances.
If you have questions ask, don't interpret.
Forgive me, I've no intention to spur on this claim, counter-claim puppet show. But I'm intrigued by your quote here.
Perhaps you could elaborate a little?
Mort
|
Mortim
Minmatar
Madison Industrial Co.
Sylph Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.06 14:55:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Mortim on 06/05/2007 14:52:24
Originally by: Kabajashi San
Edited by: Kabajashi San on 06/05/2007 08:27:29
I thought I had, but never mind.
To CVA (and other alliances), somebody who is doing trade in both KD and Unity without any other interference whatsoever is a neutral because it helps on their cause of boosting the economy in Providence thus enlarging the borders of the Empire. They can ignore the income created for UK as it is not relevant in size.
For UK such a pilot cannot be considered neutral. We are fighting for the freedom of our brothers. All these goods traded at KD are made by slaves under Amarr control. Every time you do business at KD you are creating a need for more slave labor thus putting pressure on the Amarr to raid our border worlds to fulfill that need. They are not able to produce anything with their own clumsy hands, they have to rely on skilled Matari. So in our cause to support our brothers in chains this trader has to be considered as unfriendly as long as he does business in KD or any other slaver owned station.
As far as I'm aware of that doesn't mean that he will be instantly shot when meeting with UK but he will be asked to stop business there or leave the area.
Please bear in mind that I'm am but a simple member to this alliance with no right to speak in its name of whatsoever. So this is how I see things, nothing more.
/edit: Oh yes, and I will not comment on the Sylph matter, this is for diplomats.
Ah I see how you mean now.
Yes I can indeed attest, that this policy is upheld by UK.
As for the Sylph matter, you'll be welcome to comment, if and when we make a public decleration. As it stands I believe, and fervently hope your leadership are reviewing the situation as we speak. It is not one I hoped myself, as a pilot looking to uphold the structure and integrity of the region, to be in.
Thanks for your clarification.
Mort
Edit: Ironically errored in the spelling of clarification
|