|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
manus
WESCORP 2.0
2
   |
Posted - 2017.04.15 09:05:11 -
[1] - Quote
There is a discrepancy between miner tooltip and survey scanner results which could be fixed by adding volume of ore to the scan results.
Picture explains pretty well i think.
Link |
manus
WESCORP 2.0
2
|
Posted - 2017.04.15 09:20:23 -
[2] - Quote
First of all, why do idiots always roam the features and ideas section? Why are you here Shae? What is your purpose?
You dont even realise i use the Ore Scanner but the problem is the descrepancy between the miner tooltip and the survey scan results. Miner tooltip is in m3, but the survey scan result is in raw amount of ore. The survey scanner should display m3 as well. |
manus
WESCORP 2.0
3
|
Posted - 2017.04.15 13:38:18 -
[3] - Quote
Cant tell if you are serious or not. Calculating volume by hand every time you scan is redicolous. You would think basic things like that the Survey Scanner would do, the information is not hidden anyway. |
manus
WESCORP 2.0
3
|
Posted - 2017.04.15 13:39:09 -
[4] - Quote
Sitting Bull Lakota wrote:manus wrote:First of all, why do idiots always roam the features and ideas section? Why are you here Shae? What is your purpose?
You dont even realise i use the Ore Scanner. The problem is the descrepancy between the miner tooltip and the survey scan results. Miner tooltip is in m3, but the survey scan result is in raw amount of ore. The survey scanner should display m3 as well. /sips drink Incidentally, did they ever change nos to read in gj instead of "points?" In any case mining is on CCP's horizon as is pve content. We've got the moon mining changes and some kind of dynamic pve thing coming in the next year or so, and CCP is acutely aware of both the mundanity of mining and the botballs that strip belts by the system. Expect a change to mining that will make it very difficult to afk in the not too distant future.
Thanks for the heads up. Why am i concerned they will screw it up? |
manus
WESCORP 2.0
3
|
Posted - 2017.04.15 21:06:08 -
[5] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Life doesn't end if you don't min/max your mining yield, FYI.
Im not saying it does. But when it comes to mission running everything is about min/maxing. |
manus
WESCORP 2.0
6
|
Posted - 2017.04.18 15:31:29 -
[6] - Quote
I had some cool ideas for how you could make mining a little more interesting. When you mine you get a "picture" of the roid. And you can clearly distinguish where the ore is. So you have to move your curser in that pattern. Its sort of like when you unlock your phone with a pattern. Do you know what i mean? But there should be a few more points and the lines should always be straight. Top to bottom, bottom to top, left to right. right corner to left corner etc. This way you feel like a samurai when mining. Every time you sliced a picture, a new one comes up and you have to slice that. Direction is random. The faster you are, the faster you mine. I imagine things like this will be hard to bot. And trust me, it sounds dull, but it will feel rewarding to slice ore manually if done right. You have to imagine you are removing the ore with surgical precision with the lasers. Maybe the more precise you are the more ore you get. I could see that being fun, instead of just activating a module and waiting. |
manus
WESCORP 2.0
10
|
Posted - 2017.04.19 16:26:43 -
[7] - Quote
Tabyll Altol wrote:manus wrote:There is a discrepancy between miner tooltip and survey scanner results which could be fixed by adding volume of ore to the scan results. Picture explains pretty well i think. LinkCCP pretty please Not needed, there are better things CCP can do before doing such a thing. -1
Such as? Besides this feature is not that complicated and doesent look like it will take alot of time to do. |
|
|
| |
|