Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
|

CCP Logibro
C C P C C P Alliance
1684

|
Posted - 2017.05.04 14:57:06 -
[1] - Quote
Do you own a Starbase or an Outpost? Want to know what's happening to some of your existing gear? Or do you just want to blow up some stations? This dev blog by Team Five 0 has some of the details you'll need to know.
CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
@CCP_Logibro
|
|

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research Nornir Empire
1047
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 15:09:50 -
[2] - Quote
Why do you seem hesitant to refund deprecated BPOs, making them effectively non-functional?
Free 3rd party services
Buddy link w/ bonus 250k SP, you keep the whole PLEX upon subscribing
|

lanyaie
Nocturnal Romance Cynosural Field Theory.
1241
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 15:12:03 -
[3] - Quote
CCP promoting some conflict with these new faction citadels, nice.
Spaceprincess
People who put passwords on char bazaar Eveboards are the worst.
|

MainDrain
Righteous Choirboys ChaosTheory.
328
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 15:28:39 -
[4] - Quote
Can we get an indication of the size of the rescaled citadels/outposts.
In my head I see them as being larger than fortizars, but smaller than keepstars |

Therem Harth
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 15:36:11 -
[5] - Quote
What would happen with outpost "eggs" that will happen to be manufactured but not deployed by the date of "upgrade"? |

Fish Hunter
Blacksteel Mining and Manufacturing Renaissance Federation
41
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 16:46:34 -
[6] - Quote
You're wasting your time with the rigs relative to outpost upgrades while leaving them worse than Engineering Complexes. Engineering Complexes are already better just more specialized. The main draw to keep using ouptosts for industry right now is it is safe, remove that and except for the very few fully upgraded amarr outposts everyone's going to move to Engineering complexes. |

Hashi Lebwohl
The Graduates The Initiative.
47
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 17:04:13 -
[7] - Quote
What will happen to clones in outposts? Currently those clones are perfectly safe but with this change they could be destroyed either through the destruction of the replacement citadel or its unanchoring. |

Maenth
The Thirteen Provinces
39
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 19:25:16 -
[8] - Quote
"Today we will be providing some more detail about the Starbase and outpost transition plans that we announced last week at Fanfest here in Reykjavik." - a month later... xD
Drones. Drones are a means to an end. An end to the ruthless Caldari 'progress' machines. An end to the barbaric 'redemption' proposed by the Amarr. What they see as chaos shall be my perfect order, merely beyond their comprehension.
|

AFK Hauler
State War Academy
1211
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 20:52:17 -
[9] - Quote
The conversion rate has increased for the removal of POS structures. I'm fine with the timeline, but don;t want to see the loss of bonuses until AFTER the refineries are well established and can be transitioned smoothly.
If I put a BPO in for research, and it takes over 1000 days to complete (yes there are some that will take that long), will you complete those automatically in a couple years when its time to end your POS buyback program?
|

Max Singularity
House Singularity Sixth Empire
516
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 21:15:35 -
[10] - Quote
I bless this mess! A long time coming and RIP legacy starbase code that has always been a bane to developers.
Harbinger of Faith His Holiness Maximilian Singularity VI, Pope of New Eden
First Champion House Kador (defeated) - #MagnateGate
Viceroy Interview
& Apostle In Amarr
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3452
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 21:56:16 -
[11] - Quote
Just curious: Whilst 0.0 ouposts are being removed are there any plans for changes of any sort to NPC-held outposts in pirate sovereignty 0.0 (or low/highsec, for that matter)?
Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.
|

Penance Toralen
Compass Fox
40
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 22:12:45 -
[12] - Quote
So the current small tower I have, which just does refining and small manufacture will be superseded by the local the NPC.
Still waiting to hear when the promise will be kept to small corporations/industrialists. |

Manning Zeitbringer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 22:27:29 -
[13] - Quote
It's not that rare usage of towers when you deploy into some WH system for short time (hours to days). Expedition style. As far as I understand, new structures need a week to unanchor. So, are you planning to support expedition style somehow, new smaller structures?.. |

Ebony Texas
The Alabaster Albatross Sev3rance
2
|
Posted - 2017.05.04 23:08:58 -
[14] - Quote
how much are we getting back for our researched outpost BPO's??. this has been asked several times and it seems like you guys are just cloaking up and dodging the question. |

mkint
1748
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 02:00:57 -
[15] - Quote
Penance Toralen wrote:So the current small tower I have, which just does refining and small manufacture will be superseded by the local the NPC.
Still waiting to hear when the promise will be kept to small corporations/industrialists.
Didn't you get the memo?
"Screw you" -CCP (paraphrased)
Or the other memo?
"Small corporations don't matter. Be someone else's NPC or get out." -CCP (paraphrased)
Maxim 6. If violence wasnGÇÖt your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
|

Res Five
Crown Solutions TOGETHER WE STAND
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 10:06:55 -
[16] - Quote
mkint wrote:Penance Toralen wrote:So the current small tower I have, which just does refining and small manufacture will be superseded by the local the NPC. Still waiting to hear when the promise will be kept to small corporations/industrialists. Didn't you get the memo? "Screw you" -CCP (paraphrased) Or the other memo? "Small corporations don't matter. Be someone else's NPC or get out." -CCP (paraphrased)
We've got this ever since they announced the plans to replace the towers ( automatic defenses, perfect force multipler, useful for small corps or people with RL ) with the structures ( manual defenses, horrible force multiplier - a small subcap fleet is enough to bring a fortizar to its knees - needing supporting fleet and therefor either big corps or people with a lot of free time on their hands ). |

Sylvia Kildare
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 12:21:55 -
[17] - Quote
Therem Harth wrote:What would happen with outpost "eggs" that will happen to be manufactured but not deployed by the date of "upgrade"?
I believe as of last November/December (sometime a few weeks after EVE Ascension in mid-November) they shut off the deployment of new eggs. So no new Outposts have been planted in 2017, in short.
Hashi Lebwohl wrote:What will happen to clones in outposts? Currently those clones are perfectly safe but with this change they could be destroyed either through the destruction of the replacement citadel or its unanchoring.
Citadel doesn't even have to be destroyed or taken down. Owner can just stop fueling the clone bay, shut it off, unplug the service module, whatever. Had two of my PVP clones destroyed when an Ashab citadel owner just dumped every clone in the fortizar at once. thankfully, they were cheap (and my experiment taught me to put my PVP clones back at Amarr trade hub... putting them in a citadel didn't remove the 20 hour timer, anyway). |

Sylvia Kildare
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 12:28:29 -
[18] - Quote
Penance Toralen wrote:So the current small tower I have, which just does refining and small manufacture will be superseded by the local the NPC.
Still waiting to hear when the promise will be kept to small corporations/industrialists.
You'd need both one of the new medium refineries later this year and a Raitaru to replace your POS's refining and manufacturing capability at a good efficiency, yes.
Or else use the structures of others. Or else use NPC stations and get less efficiency/higher cost/more time spent, etc.
Manning Zeitbringer wrote:It's not that rare usage of towers when you deploy into some WH system for short time (hours to days). Expedition style. As far as I understand, new structures need a week to unanchor. So, are you planning to support expedition style somehow, new smaller structures?..
I've heard WHers talk of exactly that problem. People entrenched in WHs will be even harder to kick out in this new future, their citadels will be up and if you want to build caps nearby, you won't be able to just pop up a POS and start nice and quiet, your citadel will take 24 hours to anchor and will be visible to all in blue on the system scanner, just like red signatures and green anomalies.
Something in between a mobile depot and an astrahus is needed. Something you put up fairly quickly (maybe not 10 secs like a MTU or 1 minute like a MD, but not 24 hours like a citadel, either!), can tether / dock / both at, and do more than just refit and store one jetcan worth of stuff... CCPls. |
|

CCP Habakuk
C C P C C P Alliance
1679

|
Posted - 2017.05.05 13:00:34 -
[19] - Quote
Oh, it seems like the details for the reimbursement for not deployed outpost platforms and outpost blueprints are missing. 
Therem Harth wrote:What would happen with outpost "eggs" that will happen to be manufactured but not deployed by the date of "upgrade"?
Ebony Texas wrote:how much are we getting back for our researched outpost BPO's??. this has been asked several times and it seems like you guys are just cloaking up and dodging the question.
From the patch notes for next weeks release, which will be posted soon:
Quote: Existing copies of Outpost Construction Platforms, Outpost Construction Platform Blueprints, Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been reimbursed in the following fashion: * Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been removed and their owners have been credited with isk equal to their full NPC sale value * Minmatar and Gallente Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Astrahus blueprints * Amarr and Caldari Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Raitaru blueprints * Outpost Platforms have been converted into both 1 Fortizar and 1 Azbel
Extra items will be sent to either the home station for characters or the delivery hangar in the HQ station for corporations.
CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)
Bug reporting | Mass Testing
|
|

Ebony Texas
The Alabaster Albatross Sev3rance
4
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 13:50:37 -
[20] - Quote
CCP Habakuk wrote:Oh, it seems like the details for the reimbursement for not deployed outpost platforms and outpost blueprints are missing.  Therem Harth wrote:What would happen with outpost "eggs" that will happen to be manufactured but not deployed by the date of "upgrade"? Ebony Texas wrote:how much are we getting back for our researched outpost BPO's??. this has been asked several times and it seems like you guys are just cloaking up and dodging the question. From the patch notes for next weeks release, which will be posted soon: Quote: Existing copies of Outpost Construction Platforms, Outpost Construction Platform Blueprints, Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been reimbursed in the following fashion: * Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been removed and their owners have been credited with isk equal to their full NPC sale value * Minmatar and Gallente Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Astrahus blueprints * Amarr and Caldari Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Raitaru blueprints * Outpost Platforms have been converted into both 1 Fortizar and 1 Azbel
Extra items will be sent to either the home station for characters or the delivery hangar in the HQ station for corporations.
Thank you very much. |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research Nornir Empire
1048
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 14:41:12 -
[21] - Quote
CCP Habakuk wrote:Oh, it seems like the details for the reimbursement for not deployed outpost platforms and outpost blueprints are missing.  From the patch notes for next weeks release, which will be posted soon: Quote: Existing copies of Outpost Construction Platforms, Outpost Construction Platform Blueprints, Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been reimbursed in the following fashion: * Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been removed and their owners have been credited with isk equal to their full NPC sale value * Minmatar and Gallente Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Astrahus blueprints * Amarr and Caldari Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Raitaru blueprints * Outpost Platforms have been converted into both 1 Fortizar and 1 Azbel
Extra items will be sent to either the home station for characters or the delivery hangar in the HQ station for corporations.
You're going to convert 2b NPC price BPOs into 6b NPC price BPOs that are about to lose some of their utility to the new refinery structures? Astrahus BPOs have already been reselling below NPC due to overbuying and people hopping on new bandwagons. I could understand if you were wanting to ease the transition from outposts to citadels, but we're more than a year past their introduction and have already purchased and researched the BPOs we require. This might've been worth doing back when Citadel was released, but now you're just devaluing peoples' investments in the BPOs from the last year.
Could you let us know why you're doing this? Also, please check that the extra items won't be sent to impound like what happened with SKINs and fighters as it can be very expensive to get them out of there, which is pretty unfair when they weren't there before.
The first part of my first question in this thread still seems pretty relevant.
Elizabeth Norn wrote:Why do you seem hesitant to refund deprecated BPOs, while making them effectively non-functional?
Free 3rd party services
Buddy link w/ bonus 250k SP, you keep the whole PLEX upon subscribing
|

Servanda
Liga Freier Terraner Northern Coalition.
26
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 15:29:50 -
[22] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote:... The first part of my first question in this thread still seems pretty relevant. Elizabeth Norn wrote:Why do you seem hesitant to refund deprecated BPOs, while making them effectively non-functional?
I would asume one reason for this is that bpos serve partly as ISK sinks. That's why it can be better for the economy to convert them into there replacement bpos wherever that is posible instead of pumping all that isk back into the game everytime a system gets replaced with something new. |

Rinoll Utama
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 15:30:10 -
[23] - Quote
I'm just going to echo what people have already said regarding WH gameplay. If a new, POS comparable structure isn't added then a large portion of WH gameplay is going to wither and die, basically. I don't live in WH's myself, but I can appreciate the strategies used, and this kind of emergent gameplay is something that needs to stay in the game IMO. |

March rabbit
Mosquito squadron The-Culture
2164
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 15:56:53 -
[24] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote:You're going to convert 2b NPC price BPOs into 6b NPC price BPOs that are about to lose some of their utility to the new refinery structures? Astrahus BPOs have already been reselling below NPC due to overbuying and people hopping on new bandwagons. I could understand if you were wanting to ease the transition from outposts to citadels, but we're more than a year past their introduction and have already purchased and researched the BPOs we require. This might've been worth doing back when Citadel was released, but now you're just devaluing peoples' investments in the BPOs from the last year. Could you let us know why you're doing this? Also, please check that the extra items won't be sent to impound like what happened with SKINs and fighters as it can be very expensive to get them out of there, which is pretty unfair when they weren't there before. The first part of my first question in this thread still seems pretty relevant. Elizabeth Norn wrote:Why do you seem hesitant to refund deprecated BPOs, while making them effectively non-functional? Well... It's not that these BPOs will be 'effectively non-functional'. They still can be used to make BPCs, to manufacture or they can be sold.
In similar cases with skills CCP never refunds what still can be used. And they better not do "one-time exceptions"....
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

DrysonBennington
Eagle's Talon's
325
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 16:05:33 -
[25] - Quote
What about an array that would allow "Renter's" to have their own facility to dock and launch from?
The Renter's Hub would be smaller hubs capable of handling 10, 20 or 30 hangars for neutral players to base out of. The Renters's Hub would be free of combat involving the Citadel but could still be attacked none-the-less. |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research Nornir Empire
1048
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 16:47:54 -
[26] - Quote
March rabbit wrote: Well... It's not that these BPOs will be 'effectively non-functional'. They still can be used to make BPCs, to manufacture or they can be sold.
In similar cases with skills CCP never refunds what still can be used. And they better not do "one-time exceptions"....
Outposts and their BPOs have been effectively non-functional for a while now. This dev blog also talks about doing the same to some POS arrays (which is still late), but doesn't mention anything about refunds.
http://i.imgur.com/KOYkfTk.png
Free 3rd party services
Buddy link w/ bonus 250k SP, you keep the whole PLEX upon subscribing
|
|

CCP Habakuk
C C P C C P Alliance
1680

|
Posted - 2017.05.05 17:16:46 -
[27] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote: Outposts and their BPOs have been effectively non-functional for a while now. This dev blog also talks about doing the same to some POS arrays (which is still late), but doesn't mention anything about refunds.
Some considerations regarding blueprint refunds in general: * In most cases it is much better to transition them to a different blueprint type instead of giving isk for them. Then we can treat BPOs and BPCs the same and we are not losing the research value of a blueprint. * The exact reimbursement is normally only announced (and decided) after the NPC sell orders are removed from the market: Then there is less concern if the worth of a specific blueprint increases a bit through the reimbursement (otherwise it could be abused too easily :) ).
CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)
Bug reporting | Mass Testing
|
|

Res Five
Crown Solutions TOGETHER WE STAND
1
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 18:03:17 -
[28] - Quote
CCP Habakuk wrote:* The exact reimbursement is normally only announced (and decided) after the NPC sell orders are removed from the market: Then there is less concern if the worth of a specific blueprint increases a bit through the reimbursement (otherwise it could be abused too easily :) ).
On the other hand, removing the functionality from items/blueprints will lower their worth down to zero. Since the announcement that the POSes will be removed, the modules and blueprints lost even 80%-90% of their values in some cases. How will those be reimbursed ? |

Cloon McCloon
Space Fukery
31
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 19:11:26 -
[29] - Quote
"These structures will continue to operate for some time longer and any jobs started before the August patch will complete with the bonuses intact."
Will research jobs that are still in progress roll into the new fortizar structure after the big day and continue to research, or will they fail? I purposely start very long research jobs in outposts because I don't have to worry about the outpost exploding several months into research and losing my progress. |

Graz3r
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 21:14:59 -
[30] - Quote
I can see some serious imbalance here with regards to outposts being replaced and destructible. Can ccp make low sec and high sec outposts destructible too? That way eve is in balance all over the everse.
As well as powerblocs and blue donuts will go hit all small entities to take away their outpost/faction citadels. Conflict and content is good, its what keeps everse turning, but this is a new low with no measures in place prevent powerblocs running around rampant and taking over outposts, knowing smaller entities cannot fight far bigger entities than themselves.
Think this is another ccp fail. |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research Nornir Empire
1049
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 22:05:59 -
[31] - Quote
CCP Habakuk wrote:Elizabeth Norn wrote: Outposts and their BPOs have been effectively non-functional for a while now. This dev blog also talks about doing the same to some POS arrays (which is still late), but doesn't mention anything about refunds.
Some considerations regarding blueprint refunds in general: * In most cases it is much better to transition them to a different blueprint type instead of giving isk for them. Then we can treat BPOs and BPCs the same and we are not losing the research value of a blueprint. * The exact reimbursement is normally only announced (and decided) after the NPC sell orders are removed from the market: Then there is less concern if the worth of a specific blueprint increases a bit through the reimbursement (otherwise it could be abused too easily :) ).
I can understand that reasoning, but it's too late. We've already purchased, and we know from the MERs that a lot were bought, and researched the BPOs we wanted for these previous Upwell structures (citadels are over a year old now). If you were to replace the BPOs for the items you're virtually replacing with Upwell structures at the same time then it'd be less of an issue and we could plan for that, but what you've done is left us in limbo for a period of time and are now giving us things we didn't ask for.
Sure, it'll be nice for me to have my Outpost Platform BPOs replaced with more expensive (at NPC price) BPOs, but it comes at the cost of undermining those who chose to invest in Astrahus BPOs for three times the price, or perhaps there's some relation to the worth of ISK when these old BPOs were bought more regularly? Will you be replacing Small Ship Assembly Array Blueprints (50m ISK NPC) with the closest equivalent, a Standup Manufacturing Plant I Blueprint (1b ISK NPC)? That'd be even worse, but it sounds like a good investment for me.
Free 3rd party services
Buddy link w/ bonus 250k SP, you keep the whole PLEX upon subscribing
|

Danastar
Bulgarian Experienced Crackers GaNg BaNg TeAm
27
|
Posted - 2017.05.06 12:16:20 -
[32] - Quote
Greetings,
what will happen with research jobs that are still active in outposts during transition.
thank You |

Ipushmyfingersintomyeyes
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.06 19:11:58 -
[33] - Quote
Mostly just want to know whats happening with the Tukker and Hyasyoda modules. I trust CCP to build an effective module for it but this means I will have to remove defensive modules from an EC to fit this? I sincerely hope it is not a rig as that would make things seriously complicated. Maybe ECs could get a "specialized" fitting slot to fit one or two of these that will not impact it's defensive abilities. I appreciate that CCP is going to replace these modules with something similar and not let the arrays just be forgotten. Several industrial operations are built in lowsec entirely around the Thukker and Hyasyoda modules and would be in null or highsec if the arrays didn't exist. |

Elenahina
agony unleashed Agony Empire
1692
|
Posted - 2017.05.06 23:59:30 -
[34] - Quote
Therem Harth wrote:What would happen with outpost "eggs" that will happen to be manufactured but not deployed by the date of "upgrade"?
Since you can no longer place new outposts, anyone who's still making eggs is an idiot and deserves to lose their ISK.
Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you.
Also, iderno
|

Vladimir Stolichnaya
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 16:11:46 -
[35] - Quote
On the subject of Structures ......
Why o Why Do the Medium and Large Engineering Complexes have Vulnerability Windows THREE TIMES LONGER then their Citadel counterparts ?
Med size = Citadel = 3 hours / Engineering Complex = 9 hours Lrg size = Citadel = 6 hours / Engineering Complex = 18 hours [ 2x Med for both] XLrg size = Citadel 21 hours / Engineering Complex = 36 hours [ 7x Med for Citadel / 4x for Engineering Complex *]
*[ I guess making the XLrg Engineering Complex vulnerable for 63 hours was too, too much overkill ? ] |

000Hunter000
Missiles 'R' Us
186
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 18:21:51 -
[36] - Quote
now i prolly missed a few things here.
Am i to understand POS are beeing removed?
If so, what will happen to the structures? Will i get some iskies back or what?
Like i said, i prolly missed some devblog explaining this. |

Mona Me
One MB Again
10
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 22:48:04 -
[37] - Quote
000Hunter000 wrote:
Am i to understand POS are beeing removed?
I did not know it was possible to hide under a rock in space! |

Ms Michigan
Aviation Professionals for EVE Virtus Crusade Protectorate
111
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 23:19:04 -
[38] - Quote
Question for all of you and devs:
Why not turn the conquerable stations into unconquerable pirate stations. We have those in hi-sec, why not null (and low for that matter)??? It would create a unique (Thera-esque) form of null sec. It can't be taken over and a place where you can run missions for the pirate factions. Do the same with some low-sec systems in each region maybe. Convert them to pirate sov.
Maybe this has been addressed/asked before but it seems very relevant here. I just think the whole solution you have concocted for these conquerable stations is convoluted more than it has to be and doesn't add much to the game (whereas this would.)
Flame on. |

Vladimir Stolichnaya
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.08 02:20:49 -
[39] - Quote
Ms Michigan wrote:Question for all of you and devs:  Why not turn the conquerable stations into unconquerable pirate stations. We have those in hi-sec, why not null (and low for that matter)??? It would create a unique (Thera-esque) form of null sec. It can't be taken over and a place where you can run missions for the pirate factions. Do the same with some low-sec systems in each region maybe. Convert them to pirate sov. Maybe this has been addressed/asked before but it seems very relevant here. I just think the whole solution you have concocted for these conquerable stations is convoluted more than it has to be and doesn't add much to the game (whereas this would.) Flame on.
Like most things, In Theory, sounds nice.
Now the question becomes = Would you like to have an NPC free dock staging point for your enemies right in the middle of your space ? Hmmmm Me thinks not.
I do however agree in part that the " Immensea " stations should remain unconquerable and more importantly Unanchorable stations. But that is not going to happen. Things going boom is what makes New Eden go around, and makes people buy PLEX to replace it |

Gorr Shakor
Shakor Freight and Mining Service
22
|
Posted - 2017.05.08 08:15:44 -
[40] - Quote
How is gas processing moving from Biochemical Reactor Arrays to Upwell structures? What about the Gallente tower's 100% bonus to Silo Cargo Capacity? |

Danastar
Bulgarian Experienced Crackers GaNg BaNg TeAm
27
|
Posted - 2017.05.08 16:02:55 -
[41] - Quote
Greetings,
what will happen with research jobs that are still active in outposts during transition.
thank You |

000Hunter000
Missiles 'R' Us
187
|
Posted - 2017.05.08 18:42:34 -
[42] - Quote
Mona Me wrote:000Hunter000 wrote:
Am i to understand POS are beeing removed?
I did not know it was possible to hide under a rock in space! 
Okayyyy... sooo... instead of just giving a concrete answer, you rather give a useless one... good for you! 
I admitted i missed a lot of things, but i bet i'm not the only eve player. |

Mona Me
One MB Again
10
|
Posted - 2017.05.09 01:26:49 -
[43] - Quote
000Hunter000 wrote:Mona Me wrote:000Hunter000 wrote:
Am i to understand POS are beeing removed?
I did not know it was possible to hide under a rock in space!  Okayyyy... sooo... instead of just giving a concrete answer, you rather give a useless one... good for you!  I admitted i missed a lot of things, but i bet i'm not the only eve player.
OK, a "a concrete answer" would be yes. It was announced approximately 2 years ago. I'm not sure how an 04 player could have missed that one? |

Res Five
Crown Solutions TOGETHER WE STAND
2
|
Posted - 2017.05.09 16:14:51 -
[44] - Quote
Mona Me wrote:OK, a "a concrete answer" would be yes. It was announced approximately 2 years ago. I'm not sure how an 04 player could have missed that one? 
Don't worry, you havent missed the CCP's answer to the reimbursement question. Because in 2 years there was no such answer. |

Ms Michigan
Aviation Professionals for EVE Virtus Crusade Protectorate
111
|
Posted - 2017.05.10 13:38:52 -
[45] - Quote
Vladimir Stolichnaya wrote:Ms Michigan wrote:Question for all of you and devs:  Why not turn the conquerable stations into unconquerable pirate stations. We have those in hi-sec, why not null (and low for that matter)??? It would create a unique (Thera-esque) form of null sec. It can't be taken over and a place where you can run missions for the pirate factions. Do the same with some low-sec systems in each region maybe. Convert them to pirate sov. Maybe this has been addressed/asked before but it seems very relevant here. I just think the whole solution you have concocted for these conquerable stations is convoluted more than it has to be and doesn't add much to the game (whereas this would.) Flame on. Like most things, In Theory, sounds nice. Now the question becomes = Would you like to have an NPC free dock staging point for your enemies right in the middle of your space ? Hmmmm Me thinks not. I do however agree in part that the " Immensea " stations should remain unconquerable and more importantly Unanchorable stations. But that is not going to happen. Things going boom is what makes New Eden go around, and makes people buy PLEX to replace it
You could easily fix that and have the pirate stations just deny you dockings based on standings (which is very immersion building). If you want to gain docking you have to buy tags or grind missions in low sec or something. This would single-handedly prevent large or even medium sized fleets from docking there unless it was a bunch of new alphas is my guess. Or you make people pay a docking fee (pirates charge tax). I am sure it is workable. |

Danastar
Bulgarian Experienced Crackers GaNg BaNg TeAm
27
|
Posted - 2017.05.10 17:34:10 -
[46] - Quote
Greetings,
what will happen with research jobs that are still active in outposts during transition.
thank You |

TheVault
Hogyoku Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2017.05.11 12:48:51 -
[47] - Quote
So still no word about: (as far as i know...)
- Cyno jammers - jumpbridges
My guess: they will be not replaced at all
|

Princess GayAmazingness
The Rakapas Cartel I too am gay
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.11 13:24:10 -
[48] - Quote
TheVault wrote:So still no word about: (as far as i know...)
- Cyno jammers - jumpbridges
My guess: they will be not replaced at all
Why would you need those things? The end game from CCP over the past couple of years has been to make it where you can't jump your cap or travel in any sort of reasonable time. More and more the changes seem to only strengthen my belief that CCP just wants everyone to play in their own little sandbox and not kick over sand castles anymore. You are relegated to rat in your capital in your own region, and hope that someone dread bombs you to get some content.
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6704
|
Posted - 2017.05.11 13:26:18 -
[49] - Quote
TheVault wrote:So still no word about: (as far as i know...)
- Cyno jammers - jumpbridges
My guess: they will be not replaced at all
No word yet, because CCP is going through things in turn. as far as I'm aware, no decision has been made to cut any functionality, so they're still on the plan (in the future)
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|

Gorr Shakor
Shakor Freight and Mining Service
28
|
Posted - 2017.05.11 15:38:03 -
[50] - Quote
How is gas processing moving from Biochemical Reactor Arrays to Upwell structures? What about the Gallente tower's 100% bonus to Silo Cargo Capacity? Any rigs for gas processing planned? Maybe some overall love for the booster/T3 production, finally? |

Danastar
Bulgarian Experienced Crackers GaNg BaNg TeAm
27
|
Posted - 2017.05.12 18:13:52 -
[51] - Quote
Greetings,
what will happen with research jobs that are still active in outposts during transition.
thank You |

Gulmuk
Ceptacemia DARKNESS.
6
|
Posted - 2017.05.13 01:07:12 -
[52] - Quote
So how bout before you decide to get rid of stations all together, you make it to where the search function works in ALL citadels.
Currently if an item isn't in a citadel, you can't search for it in assets. WONT SHOW UP!
FIX THE ASSET SEARCH FUNCTION FOR CITADELS! |

Gene Greyy
Pheonix Rising Corp
10
|
Posted - 2017.05.15 03:35:51 -
[53] - Quote
Penance Toralen wrote:So the current small tower I have, which just does refining and small manufacture will be superseded by the local the NPC.
Still waiting to hear when the promise will be kept to small corporations/industrialists.
I, CCP (not really CCP but, hopefully you got that already), promised that you can keep your doctor and your existing healthcare coverage... oh, and your premiums will also go down with this new plan.
Wait, did I actually say that?? What I meant to say was, small corps are not worth our time and we'll be phasing you out as well. This is a sandbox game but, only for those willing to play the game how we tell you... and that changes from day to day depending on what new rules we feel like (I mean what rules the mega-corp alliances tell us or perhaps what Hilmar's mood is like on any given day). So, I guess it's really not a sandbox at all and you the little people simply do not matter. Please take your money and leave... we don't need you and the rest of the players will ridicule you and ask for your stuff as you go.
Bottom line, CCP does not make promises; they'll give you just enough to make it interesting and as soon as you have trained for whatever niche you happen to like (and are making money)....BAM!!!!! Nerf-bat to the head and go (redacted) yourself if you don't like it.
Sorry, either get used to it or do yourself a huge favor and leave the game. They do not care, they will not listen. |

Danastar
Bulgarian Experienced Crackers GaNg BaNg TeAm
27
|
Posted - 2017.05.15 07:10:38 -
[54] - Quote
Gene Greyy wrote:Penance Toralen wrote:So the current small tower I have, which just does refining and small manufacture will be superseded by the local the NPC.
Still waiting to hear when the promise will be kept to small corporations/industrialists. I, CCP (not really CCP but, hopefully you got that already), promised that you can keep your doctor and your existing healthcare coverage... oh, and your premiums will also go down with this new plan. Wait, did I actually say that?? What I meant to say was, small corps are not worth our time and we'll be phasing you out as well. This is a sandbox game but, only for those willing to play the game how we tell you... and that changes from day to day depending on what new rules we feel like (I mean what rules the mega-corp alliances tell us or perhaps what Hilmar's mood is like on any given day). So, I guess it's really not a sandbox at all and you the little people simply do not matter. Please take your money and leave... we don't need you and the rest of the players will ridicule you and ask for your stuff as you go. Bottom line, CCP does not make promises; they'll give you just enough to make it interesting and as soon as you have trained for whatever niche you happen to like (and are making money)....BAM!!!!! Nerf-bat to the head and go (redacted) yourself if you don't like it. Sorry, either get used to it or do yourself a huge favor and leave the game. They do not care, they will not listen.
EVE ended being a sandbox with the release of skill injectors |

Graz3r
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.16 08:16:59 -
[55] - Quote
Dear CCP
It is apparent that your ability to fail at some decisions of changes has grown dramatically more than in the past years. Citadels and other changes were a success, and i agree content is needed. But your decision to make outposts into citadels was the worst decision yet and is a complete fail.
Firstly, all powerblocs are/is gunning for all outposts before the changeover. You speak about making it better for smaller groups, smaller alliances, when in effect you have made it so with this decision on outposts better for powerblocs. No smaller alliances benefit, and thus you allow for a continuous blue donut effect by doing this as well.
There is no way for smaller groups to fight and defend against powerblocs running rampant taking over stations, and you will notice, not always is the sov being taken, only the station.
CCP, you are trying to fight human nature to gather in groups, and in some cases larger groups. Fighting against human nature is simply the large fail ever. You [CCP] after 14 years should know this. You from all statistics and all the evidence of data should and can see, that you are simply feeding powerblocs and smaller groups are not really getting anything out of this entire outpost/faction citadel changeover. You know this. Its not hard to see it, unless you're actually blind. No offence meant to anyone who is actually blind.
It is very simple, with some of your ideas its great, it creates content and develops the game and the community. But your inability to create an idea that does not fight human nature and completely un-balances the game allowing blue donut powerblocs to very easily over power smaller groups and take over the soon to be very limited faction citadel/outposts is basically the worst idea CCP has ever come up with in the 14 year history of CCP Games. The method is a complete fail. CCP should honestly rethink how this will be done. Because CCP keeps boasting they trying to make the game better for smaller groups. The outpost/faction citadel changeover, does not benefit smaller groups at all. The Moon mining changes, now that's a great idea to help possibly break down powerblocs too, but not the outpost/faction citadel idea. |

Acac Sunflyier
Control-Space DARKNESS.
683
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 23:42:47 -
[56] - Quote
What happens to Blueprints that are currently being researched? What happens to blueprints that have finished research but haven't been claimed by inactive people? |

Celeste Dixie
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 13:30:42 -
[57] - Quote
I, too, am curious as to what will happen with all the old POS items. I've been gone from the game for 3.5-4 years and just returned - I have about a billion isk worth of control towers and other POS items in my hanger. Wondering if those will get converted at some point, or if I'm going to just have to reprocess them. |

Phoenix Pryde
3-I Area 42
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.17 19:20:36 -
[58] - Quote
Quote:The monument will also list the last alliance to control that Conquerable Station before the transition event. These landmarks will be a permanent reminder of the great things players have done in these systems over more than a decade.
I have no idea if the info is somewhere still in the logs/db ... but it would be kinda neat if that monument would also list the first corporations to ever capture these stations when they were introduced back then (no ingame alliances back then, corps owned them). The gold rush for them .. 
A full ownership history would be interesting too, but too lengthy in some cases maybe  |

Dani Teeg
Fwaction Warfare Corporwation
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 20:57:32 -
[59] - Quote
mkint wrote:Penance Toralen wrote:So the current small tower I have, which just does refining and small manufacture will be superseded by the local the NPC.
Still waiting to hear when the promise will be kept to small corporations/industrialists. Didn't you get the memo? "Screw you" -CCP (paraphrased) Or the other memo? "Small corporations don't matter. Be someone else's NPC or get out." -CCP (paraphrased)
What you don't have a "supporting fleet"? Then no high end item in eve is for you! |

Bryg Philomena
Grey Templars Fidelas Constans
15
|
Posted - 2017.07.25 11:02:14 -
[60] - Quote
Excuse me, but what is the reason to get rid of Outposts other than CCP just wanting us to use Citadels instead?
Why not just leave them as is? |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |