| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nightsabre
   |
Posted - 2007.05.11 10:52:00 -
[1]
I beleive its time to change the way in which self destruct works.
Self destructing itself is very useful, but what i have a problem with, is people who use it to spare themselves a lossmail!
I feel that if a ship is under fire, self destruct shouldnt enable. The ships under fire, probably going to die, so why would there logically be a need for self destruct?
Too many times capital ships do it, ive missed out on 2 killmails now, because someone self destructed.
So i said, CCP should make it so if a ship is under attack, self destruct shouldnt enable.
|
Larg Kellein
Caldari
GTE Corp
Artificial Intelligence.
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:02:00 -
[2]
Meh, his ship, his call on when to destroy it. Sure it's annoying to not get that trophy mail, but unless I'm more mistaken than a man with a degree in mistakeology from the university of Mistakeville, the objective of shooting at a ship is its destruction and removal from the control of your enemy. Killmail is a bonus after achieving that objective.
 Originally by: Roy Batty68
My software has wronged me!!! And it's immediately "sorry". Well, ok then. I suppose I'm not so upset at my software if it appologizes.
|
xMillz
Exploring Blind
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:04:00 -
[3]
Why not just get a kill mail if someone you have engaged dies... even if he self distructs?
And it should say that he self distructed.
|
Acli
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:06:00 -
[4]
Originally by: xMillz
Why not just get a kill mail if someone you have engaged dies... even if he self distructs?
And it should say that he self distructed.
I can agree with that. And to the op - Cry some more.
|
Alski
Gallente
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:09:00 -
[5]
You can have your longer ship distruct timer if i can get my instant pod distruct timer 
-
|
heheheh
Singularity.
The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:09:00 -
[6]
They are just Killmails for gods sake,
Who cares
|
000Hunter000
Gallente
Magners Marauders
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:12:00 -
[7]
Originally by: heheheh
They are just Killmails for gods sake,
Who cares
People with e-peens 
|
Shaemell Buttleson
Darwin With Attitude
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:13:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Shaemell Buttleson on 11/05/2007 11:10:17
:)
Your signature was inappropriate, email [email protected] to find out why (don't forget to include a link to it) -Sahwoolo |
Nicholas Barker
Caldari
Black Bands
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:14:00 -
[9]
I actually think it's totaly awesome that you can blow your ship up to prevent people getting anything from the kill. Firing off explosives around the bulkheads and rigging all your tech2 gear to all blow up and become scrap metal.
Do they leave a wreck?
---
- We lost that fight
- Quick, smack'em in local or they'll think they won! |
Drasked
North Face Force
Anarchy Empire
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:17:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Larg Kellein
Meh, his ship, his call on when to destroy it. Sure it's annoying to not get that trophy mail, but unless I'm more mistaken than a man with a degree in mistakeology from the university of Mistakeville, the objective of shooting at a ship is its destruction and removal from the control of your enemy. Killmail is a bonus after achieving that objective.
That would be true if self destructed ships dropped loot, but since they dont its kind of absurd that when your know you will die you are able to deny your attackers any loot.
|
|
|
Zee Zen
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:22:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Nightsabre
I beleive its time to change the way in which self destruct works.
Self destructing itself is very useful, but what i have a problem with, is people who use it to spare themselves a lossmail!
...
So i said, CCP should make it so if a ship is under attack, self destruct shouldnt enable.
I wish intelligence-challenged ("******" is censored) threads like this one would automatically self-destruct.
Someone in a capital is much more concerned about you getting his expensive fittings and seeing his strategy than he is about a stupid killmail that anyone can forge.
|
Ezekiel Sulastin
Gallente
Direct Intent
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:40:00 -
[12]
What Zee said.
Yeah, it sucks that you don't get the km, but if you want it for the boards that badly, just forge the thing - it's not like you don't have any witnesses.
|
fire 59
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:44:00 -
[13]
I think self destruct should remain the same but they should remove the insurance money you get for doing it, same for suiciding in empire but thats for another thread
BoB vs the coalition of family value's |
Larg Kellein
Caldari
GTE Corp
Artificial Intelligence.
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 11:54:00 -
[14]
Yeah, no insurance for self destruct (and losing your ships to concord), that I can /sign.
Originally by: Roy Batty68
My software has wronged me!!! And it's immediately "sorry". Well, ok then. I suppose I'm not so upset at my software if it appologizes.
|
Laboratus
Gallente
BGG
League of Abnormal Gentlemen
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 12:03:00 -
[15]
True.
Remove the timer from the self destruct.
It's not like you need time to get out, you've got clones.
Make it instant...
___
P.S.
Post with your main.
Mind control and tin hats |
Zak Bryn
Caldari
Omicron Resource Technologies Limited
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 12:03:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Zak Bryn on 11/05/2007 12:02:08
Edited by: Zak Bryn on 11/05/2007 12:01:26
Originally by: Nightsabre
I feel that if a ship is under fire, self destruct shouldnt enable. The ships under fire, probably going to die, so why would there logically be a need for self destruct?
To prevent you from getting their loot, and maybe being able to work out their tactics from the mods they fit?
|
Aeryn Scorpius
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 12:05:00 -
[17]
Removing self destruct while under fire is bullcrap. Imagine following scenario:
You're in a pod or heavily damaged ship and get ransomed. You will not pay the ransom but instead of killing you the pirates keep on scrambling the whole day and you can't escape with a self destruct.. yay nice gameplay feature -.- |
Danton Marcellus
Nebula Rasa Holdings
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 12:06:00 -
[18]
Add to it a feature that if someone initiates the selfdestruct but later aborts it a random number of modules fitted to the ship are destroyed.
Also Known As |
Erudan Virin
Minmatar
TarNec
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 12:13:00 -
[19]
Selfdestruct has no real use atm. I am hoping ccp has the balls to change this. They seem eager to remove the propblems with to many players in big fights.. So where does that place us for the future? I believe ccp will take the leap and add effects of explosions. Thus you have to be way more strategic in shooting up things, because you risk getting way to much splashed damage. Also it will balance the use of the different ship types in a really interesting manner. Last it opens a real use of self destruct. Kamikaze. This will make things a lot more dangerous, and play into the hands of both the PVP and PVE crowd. The PVPs will have a whole new battleground, and the carebearworld will have a serious financial sink, that will bring trade and production up in an area its supposed to be.
So lets see if thats not what is hinted in the blog on things to come..
|
Kesh McCall
Caldari
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 12:19:00 -
[20]
No insurance if Self destruct is used.... solved ....
|
|
|
Trem Sinval
Sinval Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 15:04:00 -
[21]
What if the Aliens get loose and you have no choice but to initiate self-destruct and use a shuttle to get to minimum safe distance?
The ship'd be pretty banged up by then, what with all the small arms fire in sensitive areas...
- Trem |
Chewan Mesa
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 15:39:00 -
[22]
Originally by: heheheh
They are just Killmails for gods sake,
Who cares
QFT.
|
Enre Sung
Market Control Paradigm
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 15:46:00 -
[23]
If you can't kill a ship in two minutes + the amount of time it's taken to make him decide he's lost, too bad so sad. If I was about to get killed you'd bet I'd be taking it with me. The only way you can feasibly not kill a ship in that period of time is if it's a capital, and then you get a *****in screenshot of "Moros belonging to ______ Self-Destructs", and that's better than any killmail
|
Frug
Zenithal Harvest
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 15:52:00 -
[24]
a) They are just killmails, who cares
b) The only time I've considered using self destruct was when I was under attack (I don't bother with insurance fraud).
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - -
If you think I'm awesome, say BOOO
BOOO!! - Ductoris
Neat look what I found - Kreul
Hey, my marbles |
ry ry
StateCorp
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 15:56:00 -
[25]
Insurance fraud isn't the mad moneymaker people seem to think it is. Go on, give it a go.
and as for not being able to destruct when in combat, seriously, put the ***** pipe down. i'm going to make a point of self destructing at every opportunity now just to irritate the people who whine about it.
|
Taran Summers
The Merovingians
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 16:04:00 -
[26]
:Wanders the halls of his ship, leaning his surplus mines from 2003 on all his nice modules and wiring a remote detonator to each before unrolling hundreds of meters of cable back to a control port on his pod labeled "By My Hand - Not Yours". Then ties his hair back and slides back into the gel within the pod.: |
eLLioTT wave
Art of War
Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 16:21:00 -
[27]
let them have the mail anyway - make self destruct timer shorter. introduce area damage when it goes off. Sounds like fun!
|
Wyehr
Shadow Of The Light
R i s e
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 16:22:00 -
[28]
I would consider self destruct as a normal attack and list the pilot as getting the final blow on his own ship in the killmail. The killmail in that case should go to someone else then.
I'd also remove insurance payments for self destruct. I have no problem with people getting insurance after getting popped by Concord, as mistakes can happen, but self destruct is a whole different story.
Not exactly a critical issue for CCP to fix, and there are other ways to publicly shame poor sports.
[ 2007.03.18 18:45:59 ] (notify) Typhoon belonging to Gandolf self-destructs. |
Derovius Vaden
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 16:25:00 -
[29]
Self destructing anything bigger than a cruiser should be the same as setting off a DD. These ships have massive reactors, they just don't go "pop". This should make pirates and gankers more conservative with their "omg, shoot them in teh face" attitude.
|
Ticondrius
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.05.11 16:27:00 -
[30]
Soo, it was wrong for Captain Kirk to blow up the USS Enterprise to
prevent it from falling into the hands of a kingon (enemy) crew?
I'm with the crowd that thinks they should still get the killmail, but without the destroyed items list. Also, perhaps a slight penalty to your insurance payout.
The entire point of self-destruct in combat is to rob the enemy of your modules AND knowing your fitting.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
RABBLE! RABBLERABBLE!!
MMORPG: Many Men Online Role Playing Girls |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |