EVE Search - Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction

All Channels

Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 4 post(s)
Petrified Old and Petrified Syndication TOG - The Older Gamers Alliance 447	Posted - 2017.06.09 11:26:28 - [1] - Quote If the issue is that rewards are too easy, then nerfing something used in both PvP and PvE does not make a lot of sense. People will simply change to another ship that will give the damage output they desire for running sites. Perhaps the problem is the availability of sites and the need to improve NPC responses to attack types. Maybe what you really need to do, instead of hurting a tool used for both PvP and PvE, is reduce the number of sites that spawn. If you reduce the number of sites which spawn, even with max IHUB upgrades, you will help Sov Null Sec by creating more of a demand to expand territory which will create more PvP. By reducing Fighter damage, you reduce the PvP capabilities of not just carriers and super carriers, but also of Citadels (and fighter support from citadels is laughably weak from my experience). By reducing the effectiveness of a tool used in more than just PvE, you miss fixing the target... which is to reduce an isk faucet. So instead of reducing the effectiveness of fighters, why not reduce reduce the number of sites instead? Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space. Support better localization for the Japanese Community.
Petrified Old and Petrified Syndication TOG - The Older Gamers Alliance 450	Posted - 2017.06.09 21:49:27 - [2] - Quote Chance Ravinne wrote: Lightbringer wrote: Does the stupid faction BS Nerf take into account this just as stupid nerf aswell? Yesterday people complained the Battleship nerf would make Carriers the default king of the meta. Now CCP is dealing with Carriers and people want to cry? My assumption is they are pushing towards T1 battleships When I lived in Oasa and ratted anomalies, I used either a Rokh or a Marauder. Carriers were quick, but too slow to get out of dodge if something went wacky. Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space. Support better localization for the Japanese Community.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.