Thanks everyone for the feedback on the Volume column in the survey scanner window.

With regards to the reasoning behind this change, we deemed that as the "Mining amount" attribute of any mining module and the capacity of a ship is represented in m3, not units, its more useful to be able to see the total volume of Ore in a given asteroid.

However, as the old saying goes, "any change breaks someone workflow" and we understand that this means an amount of window adjustment for anyone who's been using the window on its minimum size.

We've discussed this internally, and decided that implementing filtering or rearranging for columns would be a bigger task than we can commit developer hours to at this time while we work on other priorities. However, we are open to discussion about how to best arrange these columns to fit everyone's needs.

One goal we'd like to achieve is keep Quantity and Volume next to each other as they both have similar uses, so we could go for something like these following options:

1. Ore Name | Distance | Volume | Quantity
2. Ore Name | Distance | Quantity | Volume
3. Ore Name | Quantity | Volume | Distance

We're liking the look of the 2nd option there as it allows the previous "tiny window" use case, but doesn't seperate the related columns.

What would people think of this as a compromise?

Side note: I'm not aware of a single EVE dev that uses a 4k monitor when designing or testing features, I'm not sure where that assumption came from!

Love,