EVE Search - remove sentry guns from gates in low sec

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

remove sentry guns from gates in low sec

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Ris Dnalor Fleet of Doom Ushra'Khan 142	Posted - 2011.12.31 21:57:00 - [1] - Quote Opens up pvp for ship sizes below BC makes ransoming more viable as you're not racing the sentry guns, makes safe passage thru low sec easier for non-pvpers win-win!
Doc Fury Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 90	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:00:00 - [2] - Quote Remove all NPC stations from low sec. Win-Win! No more docking games! /amidoingitright? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.'
Alexa Coates The Scope Gallente Federation 30	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:02:00 - [3] - Quote I bet OP also likes the idea of removing all security and CONCORD and making all of new eden nullsec. Love my Gallente Federation Navy ships!
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 2513	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:06:00 - [4] - Quote Ris Dnalor wrote: makes safe passage thru low sec easier for non-pvpers Um, how? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players. Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
A Lunchbox Basgerin Pirate 12	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:12:00 - [5] - Quote Learn how to deal with sentry guns or gtfo of lowsec. Small ships are still viable here, just not on gate/station.
T' Elk Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic 245	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:12:00 - [6] - Quote Malcanis wrote: Ris Dnalor wrote: makes safe passage thru low sec easier for non-pvpers Um, how? Campers can fit for more DPS instead of having to tank the gate guns, therefore the transition from transport to capsule is much smoother and has less delay. It's an ingenious plan imo. God wears-áRay Ban Aviators.
Ris Dnalor Fleet of Doom Ushra'Khan 142	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:18:00 - [7] - Quote A Lunchbox wrote: Learn how to deal with sentry guns or gtfo of lowsec. Small ships are still viable here, just not on gate/station. /emote pats Lunchbox on the head, there there Lunch, they wont' take guns away.... probably
Tore Vest Vikinghall 121	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:23:00 - [8] - Quote Remove lowsec
Roh Voleto Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 88	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:45:00 - [9] - Quote remove CONCORD from highsec Opens up pvp for everybody makes ransoming more viable as you're not racing CONCORD, makes safe passage everywhere easier for non-pvpers win-win!
Bumblefck Kerensky Initiatives 2558	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:54:00 - [10] - Quote No, and stop your criminal activities young man GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki
Jhagiti Tyran Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns 181	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:57:00 - [11] - Quote Remove the sentry guns from low sec? Are you crazy? Low sec needs more security to make it more viable, CCP need to consider adding faction navy or concord to low sec so people can go to low sec and PVE.
ElQuirko The Demonfuge Malevolent Fan Club 237	Posted - 2011.12.31 23:04:00 - [12] - Quote I have an idea How about we... allow capitals into highsec? That makes highsec safer for all subcapital pilots. Hell, I don't have to justify it because I'm following the OP's logic.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 842	Posted - 2012.01.01 00:05:00 - [13] - Quote pfft add more guns to the low sec gates and stations pvp should be happening in open space out there. Lower the sec fewer the guns. It shouldnt be a OMFG wall of pwn at the gates between 0.5 and a 0.4 It should be near 0.2 and 0.1 instead. The entire idea is to 'enitice' players to venture out into low sec if you make it safer at some concessions but as deeper your security goes the less protection there is. They should also make it cynojammed in low sec as well and possibly allow thier gates to jump a capitol ship but it stresses the gate out and shuts it down temporarly. I agree with faction navies but have the navy be tankable and defeatable when they respond and only have them respond to 'loyal' members of the territory who are trying to secure it. So committing crimes in an area would actually lower your rep with the territory owner this would encourage 'raiding' other folks turfs instead of staying at home ot kill alot. I also think there should be another 'low sec' lets call it lawless, basically unholdable null sec spots where current low sec can behavior can move to. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Amro One One. 71	Posted - 2012.01.01 00:42:00 - [14] - Quote Take away t2 resistances for the hulk. Make Low sec mining eaiser
Corina Jarr Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built 147	Posted - 2012.01.01 00:43:00 - [15] - Quote I could agree to adding tracking to sentry guns, but not their total removal.
Terajima Kazumi EVE University Ivy League 40	Posted - 2012.01.01 01:25:00 - [16] - Quote We already have this; it's called Null Sec.
Syphon Lodian Fabled Enterprises 9	Posted - 2012.01.01 01:33:00 - [17] - Quote Terajima Kazumi wrote: We already have this; it's called Null Sec. What is the Null Sec you speak of, and when do I get to meet this ... Null?
Derath Ellecon Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal 63	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:04:00 - [18] - Quote Personally I think they should double the number of guns at stations and gates. While I guess camping the gates for the random gank is fun for some, it seems fairly boring in terms of a good fight. I'd like to see a way to make LS travel just ever so much easier, so that maybe there could be a way to get more fights in the system instead of gate and station games.
Jovan Geldon SniggWaffe Band of Abos 263	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:08:00 - [19] - Quote Nova Fox wrote: unholdable null sec spots Stain, Venal, Curse, The Great Wildlands, Syndicate, Outer Ring, bits of Delve and Querious, and that one system in Geminate say hi
Killstealing Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild 285	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:20:00 - [20] - Quote Alexa Coates wrote: the idea of removing all security and CONCORD and making all of new eden nullsec. this gets my vote
Jhagiti Tyran Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns 183	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:21:00 - [21] - Quote Jovan Geldon wrote: Nova Fox wrote: unholdable null sec spots Stain, Venal, Curse, The Great Wildlands, Syndicate, Outer Ring, bits of Delve and Querious, and that one system in Geminate say hi I don't think he has spent much time outside of high sec.
Thaylon Sen The Istari Syndicate 10	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:24:00 - [22] - Quote Actually if you want to see more targets in low sec you need to beef the gate guns up, not down!
Shadow Lord77 Shadow Industries I 100	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:27:00 - [23] - Quote I figure since the warp-to command was changed from a minimum distance of 15km to 0km it's only natural to remove sentry guns/faction ships to give low-sec pirates more of a chance of catching passing ships. I'm all for making low-sec more dangerous to travel through.
Aurelius Valentius Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 43	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:28:00 - [24] - Quote what??? never... Gate Guns RULE!... they are a key factor in any Gate Fun... why it would be boring if noobish people didn't try to gate camp and then suddenly pop due to being primaried by the guns!... never, the tears of noobs must be maintained!... -1/10 this post is silly, EVE doesn't need less guns, it needs more, bigger guns everywhere!... MORE GUNS!!! ...and Pinning/Toggle must be restored (paraphrase of Cicero).
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 844	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:30:00 - [25] - Quote Jovan Geldon wrote: Nova Fox wrote: unholdable null sec spots Stain, Venal, Curse, The Great Wildlands, Syndicate, Outer Ring, bits of Delve and Querious, and that one system in Geminate say hi I was more meaning like an entire ring of them to act as a buffer between null and low some sort of untamed lands those places you mention are a bit small. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Jaroslav Unwanted Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic 1159	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:30:00 - [26] - Quote Tore Vest wrote: Remove lowsec Ding! Ding! We have an winner.
Jhagiti Tyran Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns 183	Posted - 2012.01.01 02:45:00 - [27] - Quote Nova Fox wrote: Jovan Geldon wrote: Nova Fox wrote: unholdable null sec spots Stain, Venal, Curse, The Great Wildlands, Syndicate, Outer Ring, bits of Delve and Querious, and that one system in Geminate say hi I was more meaning like an entire ring of them to act as a buffer between null and low some sort of untamed lands those places you mention are a bit small. Those regions are not exactly small and cover a huge area, some of them like Stain are absolutely massive and have large numbers of stations. Others are large but don't have as many stations.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 854	Posted - 2012.01.01 05:09:00 - [28] - Quote ??? Then wtf was Rise doing in Stain back then? I remember the idiot FCs losing that place as the last straw of me staying in 0.0. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Pinkfluff Lone Wolf Supply Co. 9	Posted - 2012.01.01 05:22:00 - [29] - Quote Best idea I've seen here is adding faction forces to low sec. Have them only defend those who have a certain level of positive standings with them, not insanely high but not 0.1 either. They should be able to be defeated, but not by just a few ships. It makes sense from a story perspective. Low sec areas should feel like outlying areas that are contested between the empires, but not totally lawless.
Selinate 307	Posted - 2012.01.01 05:23:00 - [30] - Quote If anything, gate guns need to be buffed so that more people move out to low sec and try to set up shop. It will lead to more PvP in the end, just not gate camping noob PvP that you want...
Alexa Coates The Scope Gallente Federation 32	Posted - 2012.01.01 05:41:00 - [31] - Quote If anything, gate guns need a boost. I mean come on i can tank them in a cruiser. Long enough to do my business and **** off atleast. Love my Gallente Federation Navy ships!
Selinate 307	Posted - 2012.01.01 05:44:00 - [32] - Quote Alexa Coates wrote: If anything, gate guns need a boost. I mean come on i can tank them in a cruiser. Long enough to do my business and **** off atleast. I promise this is not an alt of mine
Manssell OmiHyperMultiNationalDrunksConglomerate 18	Posted - 2012.01.01 05:45:00 - [33] - Quote Aurelius Valentius wrote: what??? never... Gate Guns RULE!... they are a key factor in any Gate Fun... why it would be boring if noobish people didn't try to gate camp and then suddenly pop due to being primaried by the guns!... never, the tears of noobs must be maintained!... -1/10 this post is silly, EVE doesn't need less guns, it needs more, bigger guns everywhere!... MORE GUNS!!! And don't forget us drunks that like to forget we have GCC and warp to gates. And then forget we have the gate agro after the GCC wears off and warp back after after that. And then... Sometime I like to cry about it in local just to harvest my own tears.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 854	Posted - 2012.01.01 05:46:00 - [34] - Quote Bashes head against the desk after looking up allaince wikies. I swore we where further east than that before rise fell apart. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Alexa Coates The Scope Gallente Federation 32	Posted - 2012.01.01 06:36:00 - [35] - Quote Selinate wrote: Alexa Coates wrote: If anything, gate guns need a boost. I mean come on i can tank them in a cruiser. Long enough to do my business and **** off atleast. I promise this is not an alt of mine I promise this too. Love my Gallente Federation Navy ships!
Vyl Vit Cambio Enterprises 160	Posted - 2012.01.01 07:08:00 - [36] - Quote Ris Dnalor wrote: Opens up pvp for ship sizes below BC makes ransoming more viable as you're not racing the sentry guns, makes safe passage thru low sec easier for non-pvpers win-win! AHAR!! What the OP meant to say was, "Take away all the risk for my vandalism and wanton destruction so I can have my cake, YOUR cake, and everybody ELSE'S cake, and eat it all TOO." I never thought I'd live to see the day when someone would fnally make this request. I could go on for hours... but, what's the point? To her it doesn't matter much.-á It's chasms have been leapt, and she leans upon the skepticism of her chosen fate.
Jhagiti Tyran Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns 184	Posted - 2012.01.01 11:42:00 - [37] - Quote Nova Fox wrote: ??? Then wtf was Rise doing in Stain back then? I remember the idiot FCs losing that place as the last straw of me staying in 0.0. Because for alliances that lose their sov npc nullsec can be a good choice to regroup and chill for a little bit until they get sorted. Npc nullsec is also home to smaller corps and alliances that are not interested in holding sov, you have the smaller corps and alliances that are not capable of holding sov. If you can hold a corp together and take over an unoccupied system or drive occupants out npc 0.0 is a fun place for small gang and roaming pvp.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 854	Posted - 2012.01.01 12:00:00 - [38] - Quote I already corrected myself I was thinking the wrong region Rise died in. To bad I was in that boat when it did burn at sea. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Schalac Apocalypse Reign 1	Posted - 2012.01.01 12:07:00 - [39] - Quote I agree. All sentry guns and stations should be removed from lowsec. From now on all level 5 missions will be in highsec with a random lowsec destination within the region. Lowsec should only support POS activities and FW. This will be a FW buff. A POS like structure will be erected in every lowsec system for the use of of the controlling faction after one week of control of that system. With the new plex spawn mechanism it will breath new life into faction warfare, and ruin the day of those entrenched into lowsec as faction warfare pilots. I call for this action to be implemented immediately.

CCP Phantom C C P C C P Alliance 884	Posted - 2012.01.01 13:39:00 - [40] - Quote Moved from General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.