WarMongeer
   |
Posted - 2007.05.27 11:54:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Wild Rho
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Elmo Noguchi
Tell us with a straight face that you think privately emailling an issue like this would have gotten anything done.
Also, do you believe the community deserves to know about these sorts of allegations when it's possible (and I guess the goons believe) that they're true?
Yes, I think it would have been the correct thing to do, and the issues would have been addressed.
No, I don't think the community has a right to know about any such allegations, or the resolution - just in the same way that petitions and about players are private.
What matters is that issues are addressed.
Your arguement that it is okay to use the wrong method because you don't think the right method will work is kinda like saying that it is okay to MSN someone if you don't trust petitions, non?
Personally I believe in using the appropriate channels.
I don't favour threadnaughts over emails to IA, and I don't support MSNs in place of petitions.
I guess you think it is okay though?
One thing to keep in mind Avon. Every other channel for giving the information was tried before the threadnaught was launched and came back with nothing but silence, not even a basic acknowledgement.
The petition filed asking about the issue was deleted with no response, feedback or well...anything.
Convo's and pms to the GMs in question got no response (although ths in itself isn't that unusal I'll admit).
A well written non flame bait forum post was made asking about the situations involved wasn't just modded, it was outright locked and delete within 30 seconds of being posted with again, no feedback or response.
The threadonaught may not have been the preferable way to get this information out and get a response but so far it has been the only proven way that actually works even while CCP harps on about transparancy and so on. Any other attempt is met with silence and cenorship and even forum/ingame bannings for anyone that even mentions it.
So the claims in this very thread that IA was not emailed directly (as Arkanon could not be trusted to police this fairly) are lies?
So how much of the rest of this are lies?
Was the IA department emailed directly (as is the correct reporting method) before the threadnaught or not?
Nothing personal Avon, but your forum stance here stands in pretty stark relief to your alliance strategies in (and most especially out) of game. Why are you asking the goons if they follow the rules when your alliancemates can't seem to? Were you aware of your people MSNing a dev OOG? Was there a good reason for the ISD person to be fired?
These are the sort of questions that pop to mind when someone from BOB posts about following proper procedure.
The Goons post here because they think you've got an unfair advantage out of game. Until proof comes out to the contrary, many of us will be forced to agree.
|