|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 17:32:00 -
[1]
bump
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.07.01 01:13:00 -
[2]
Edited by: HydroSan on 01/07/2007 01:12:11 I motion that we continue bumping this thread until we get another response from CCP. I don't think they understand just how mindnumbing half of their game is, and that this change only made it even more mindnumbing. A carrier costs a billion and a half to buy and fit, and over six months of training. Seeing as how carriers haven't been able to run missions for a long time (and the fact that the new L5's don't allow capitals to enter), and taking into account how bugged fighters are and how a battleship can often tank an entire carrier worth of fighters with even a T1 low-SP tank, there should at least be a FEW perks to owning a carrier.
Jumping GSCs was one of those perks.
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.07.01 04:28:00 -
[3]
Originally by: William Hamilton What they realy should've done is bump up the unpackaged size of haulers a bit.
Or at least allowed Standard Containers (remember those?) into the cargo bay of ships. If CCP doesn't like GSCs for whatever reason that's fine, but they should at least give us a way to sort out our crap.
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.07.09 23:53:00 -
[4]
Stop bringing real life analogies into this. We're talking about EVE, not the US Navy.
Bumping this so it doesn't leave the front page.
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.07.15 05:54:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Riley Craven
Nice try, but you arenĘt fooling anyone. Where did CCP ever say that was GSC intended purpose? I read every dev comment I can, and I havenĘt seen any such statement. Further, if what you say is actually true, then they would have nerfed GSC on ALL ships. I have seen countless pvp videos of people using cans in their holds to store extra ammo etc. A lot of people use this tactic. Further, why would CCP knowingly keep GSC around when they increase carrying capacity in much greater instances than just the one you outlined if that wasnĘt their intended purpose? For that matter, why even code something like that if thatĘs not what they wanted.
Agreeing with this. Bumping to keep on first page.
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.07.16 13:13:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Riley Craven Lol the world is coming to an end! A goon has just agreed with a previous BoB member! Everyone to the presses!!!! :)
Game mechanics affect everyone regardless of politics.
Bump.
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.07.19 12:17:00 -
[7]
To the first page we go.
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.07.27 20:19:00 -
[8]
I'm willing to bet that CCP has this topic on their ignore list, because there isn't any reason why this topic has reached 16 pages and been on the front page of this forum without a dev response to our suggestions, complaints and questions.
Oh well. Here's hoping we get some kind of jump-capable logistics ship (as in moving things, not healing things).
|
|
|
|