| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rhea Tard
   |
Posted - 2007.06.11 11:12:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Kehmor
It's called a templar. It is an amarr fighter.
interesting, but what uses this templar you speak of.
|
Microsoft Sam
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 11:13:00 -
[32]
Originally by: IbrahimAbbas AbuAhmed
I suck at eve
here I made you a picture to keep you warm at night.
HERE R PICTURE PLZ
|
Visionsz
Caldari
Midas Tycho
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 12:02:00 -
[33]
To be fair that so called Nerf doesn't make the slighest difference! Still *****ing ships to passive tank... try it out on the test server.
Thank you, that is all.
|
Drizit
Amarr
Lonely out here
Black Sun Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 12:46:00 -
[34]
Seruisly, your character is 2.5 years old and you still need a year to train for a CS? Is your character an industrial or something? Mine is an industrial character and I have still been flying a Damnation for the last 4 months.
Honestly, it may be a nerf but a nearly invulnerable passive tank is still very possible due to rigs.
--
|
Roshan longshot
Gallente
Ordos Humanitas
FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 13:10:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Neoromi
Stuff, can i have it??
Dont you ever get tired of that?
ROSHAN LONGSHOT 03-06-2003 18-06-2007. CCP THIS HAS BEEN A GOOD FOUR YEARS. YOU DONE WELL. BUT ATLAST ALL THINGS MUST COME TO AN END, AND FOR ME ITS TIME TO LEAVE EVE. CLEAR SKIES AND SMOOTH JETS |
coldplasma
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 13:19:00 -
[36]
ZOMG
-15%
THIS IS BIG GUYS, REALLY COMMAND SHIPS ARE USELESS NOW!!!!
Seriously though, I think they needed SOMETHING, I've seen 4-5 battleships pounding on a command ship for a good few minutes before they manage to break it's tank. No non-capital ship should be able to take that much of a beating.
_________________
|
SilKKZ the3rd
Caldari
Solar Acquisition Services
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 13:25:00 -
[37]
I fly my nighthawk perfectly fine :)
|
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Sparta Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 15:01:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Roshan longshot
Originally by: Neoromi
Stuff, can i have it??
Dont you ever get tired of that?
It's traditional.
--------
|
Vitrael
Stormriders
Fimbulwinter
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 16:01:00 -
[39]
Word of the devs: someone forgot to tweak BC shield recharge rate when they were introduced. Now it is being fixed.
----------
|
JourneymanDave
Interstellar eXodus
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 16:21:00 -
[40]
Originally by: IbrahimAbbas AbuAhmed
If this is the route CCP is going to take, listening to forum whiners and nerfing, I am not willing to spend my time and money playing this game.
Ah yes... the irony is THICK.
|
Fink Angel
Caldari
The Merry Men
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 16:28:00 -
[41]
Wise man say: "Fly a cookie cutter ship and you'll lose your appendage when the baker comes."
|
IbrahimAbbas AbuAhmed
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 16:30:00 -
[42]
Originally by: JourneymanDave
Originally by: IbrahimAbbas AbuAhmed
If this is the route CCP is going to take, listening to forum whiners and nerfing, I am not willing to spend my time and money playing this game.
Ah yes... the irony is THICK.
There's no irony here.
I support leaving the game the way it is, there is a reason it is successful and players have to adapt. Vultures are not overpowered immune gods that go around doing 20,000 dps to everyone. They're just ships meant to survive and support, and do so very well pre-patch.
I'm not whining about the current game mechanics. I express dissatisfaction with CCP listening to whiners, and warning it that it may be taking the wrong road - the road to failure.
|
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Sparta Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 16:34:00 -
[43]
Originally by: IbrahimAbbas AbuAhmed
Originally by: JourneymanDave
Originally by: IbrahimAbbas AbuAhmed
If this is the route CCP is going to take, listening to forum whiners and nerfing, I am not willing to spend my time and money playing this game.
Ah yes... the irony is THICK.
There's no irony here.
I support leaving the game the way it is, there is a reason it is successful and players have to adapt. Vultures are not overpowered immune gods that go around doing 20,000 dps to everyone. They're just ships meant to survive and support, and do so very well pre-patch.
I'm not whining about the current game mechanics. I express dissatisfaction with CCP listening to whiners, and warning it that it may be taking the wrong road - the road to failure.
The irony is:
/whine
People whine on forums, and it gets things changed! So I'm going to whine on the forum for you not to change it, and if you don't change it the way my whine asks, I'm quitting! Because I don't like the way whiners keep getting things changed!
/end whine
If the Devs have accidentally made something overpowered, they're going to fix it. End of.
--------
|
Baccala
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 16:39:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Vitrael
Word of the devs: someone forgot to tweak BC shield recharge rate when they were introduced. Now it is being fixed.
Frankly, forgetting is quite hard to put at ease... so if they FORGOT, and FORGOT to tell us... why not give players who spent time training to rearrange a certain amount of skill points?
Personally, I think twice a year we all should be able to rearrange 1 mil skillpoints. Take off 1 mil, add it anywhere. Its just plain and simple common mistake and nerf readjustments. We should have room for our mistakes too, some of which are CCPs fault.
|
Onnawa
Minmatar
Alcohol Fueled Brutality
X-PACT
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 19:56:00 -
[45]
Skill-point migration? Are you freaking kidding me? Let's have a real-world application here....
When I graduated high school, physical therapy was all the rage. Everyone in my class was going off to get a physical therapy degree at college, along with about 45% of the other graduates in 1999. Flash forward 4 years, to when the PT market has crashed due to there being 10-15 PTs for every PT job...if you go back to your school and say "Well, this physical therapy degree isn't working for me anymore...can I trade it for a different degree?" what do you think that university is going to tell you?
Everyone needs to grow up. Go for the Flavor of the Month, and it'll always turn to ash in your mouth.
_____________________________________
I'm not a Pirate. I just have anger management issues.......and kleptomania. |
Ral Ulgur
Helion Production Labs
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 20:09:00 -
[46]
I'll take the SPR nerf.
I'll take the recharge time nerf. (even though I don't get the point, it's not like you can solowtfpwn without webs and scrams).
As for missions a high end CNR beats even the outmost factioned out nighthawk in tank and dps.
I'd agree to a compromise... 15% recharge rate nerf, 10% shield increase though :(
|
John Blackthorn
Foundation
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 20:47:00 -
[47]
The shield recharge that can currently be achieved is to high, it is a unbalanced ship and thus the change. You can STILL throw tons of mods, and two rigs for shield recharge and your still going to get a 50 shields per second recharge on the ship. Just because you have a passive tank with great resists doesn't mean you should be invensiable and have to have 10 guys shooting you before your tank fails.
|
Incantare
Caldari
Darkness Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 21:35:00 -
[48]
Don't quit, laugh at the EANM nerf  .
|
Namingway
Important Yet Underrated Video Game Characters
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 22:11:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Ryas Nia
guess what.... the passive tank is not dead, just not the uber win button any longer.
God forbid a tank that uses up EVERY mid and low slot, as well as rigs, be able to tank well on a ship that is suppose to tank well regardless.
I can't help but notice this won't address several gallente ships having stupidly good passive tanks, or ships like the absol, which while active, is just a stupidly powerful tank.
Originally by: CCP kieron
If a member of the EVE community finds he or she cannot accept our current level of transparency, we bid you good luck in finding a company that meets your needs.
|
Namingway
Important Yet Underrated Video Game Characters
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 22:24:00 -
[50]
Originally by: John Blackthorn
The shield recharge that can currently be achieved is to high, it is a unbalanced ship and thus the change. You can STILL throw tons of mods, and two rigs for shield recharge and your still going to get a 50 shields per second recharge on the ship. Just because you have a passive tank with great resists doesn't mean you should be invensiable and have to have 10 guys shooting you before your tank fails.
People who call passive shield tanks invincible haven't a clue as to what they're talking about.
People act like peak recharge is even remotely comparable to a constant repair amount.
Not to mention a good alpha, and you've gone past the peak, and it's all over. Hell a big enough alpha will outright bypass the peak area turning that '200 shield/sec passive tank' into a wreck.
Originally by: CCP kieron
If a member of the EVE community finds he or she cannot accept our current level of transparency, we bid you good luck in finding a company that meets your needs.
|
l3lind Man
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 22:31:00 -
[51]
Edited by: l3lind Man on 13/06/2007 22:30:44
you got owned.. eventually you will realize (if you keep playing) never, ever, ever train for a ship based on one good thing it can do.. like training for a nighthawk to passive tank. train everything, and be able to use everything slowly and you'll always be able to use the fotm.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |