|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
   |
Posted - 2007.06.11 18:01:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Hamfast
Originally by: Takahashi Arran
... stuff ...
I guess we should be glad it was "Leaked" to a site that would take it down and not one dedicated to the destruction of Eve and CCP...
Yeah Kugu's site did remove it, nice of you to say so...
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.11 18:37:00 -
[2]
What concerns me is why a single ISD member would have the ability to dump a large amount of internal and customer emails and release them. Surely there should be sa***uards to prevent this kind of release?
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 07:32:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Astarte Nosferatu
Having read said logs (July '06-April '07) which I downloaded from SHC before it was removed
You did not, as these logs were never present on SHC. Please get your facts right.
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 08:14:00 -
[4]
Originally by: mazzilliu
Can we remove personal information from the hands of volunteers now?
Given the information released, it seems the current system is just a single mail account accessible by all mods. I'd recommend an automated web control panel for mail viewing, that hides the email address of the player and is not possible to export from in bulk.
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 09:24:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mashie Saldana
Will we get an option to have the usernames changed now when they have been compromised?
If you have a proper password, having your account name released should pose no unduly high risk to your account security.
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 14:05:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Major Stormer
Why did you feel it required to place blame on SHC (http://www.scrapheap-challenge.com/viewtopic.php?t=5988), when they was not responsible for this, and the thread was completely deleted after you requested it to be?
If the official line is going to be to blame SHC for this, I may very well quit right here, because to do so shows a complete lack of understanding of the Eve community, as well as an inability to confirm facts of what transpired.
Wrangler has stated that mails were linked to on SHC. This is ENTIRELY FALSE. Why Wrangler believes this to be true, I do not know. I am aware that he has attacked SHC for being anti-CCP and anti-ISD in the past. If by that he means people say negative things about CCP and ISD, then yes he is correct. This is what we call 'open discussion'. SHC is not a place to relentlessly bash CCP, if people post unfair criticisms they get called on them.
This may be news to you guys at CCP: you are not perfect. You make mistakes. People notice these mistakes and comment on them. But we think you're capable of working past your mistakes, as lets face it, we've been quite happy with Eve for a number of years. Almost all of the SHC posters still play the game. We're overjoyed when we hear that devs read out Game Design & Balance forum, as we seriously think our ideas will be of use. We want to help make the game better.
The villain is the ISD leaker here people. If you're going to demonise a community that cares deeply about the state of the game, then good luck to you in keeping Eve going.
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 14:45:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Dark Shikari
They're not ingame warnings. The logs posted are from the ISD moderator squad mailing list, which by definition they have to have access to.
He's referring to the warnings lists posted on SHC, which contain both forum and ingame warnings and were retrieved from the mod area of this website.
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 15:12:00 -
[8]
Thank you Kieron, hopefully we can all be friends again now 
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 21:39:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Dark Shikari
Originally by: Elder Bob
SHC
A DBP Post on SHC
Wow, that is actually a very reasonable post.
He did initially try to claim my OP was a troll, we can't give the man full credit quite yet 
People moaning about SHC censorship: discussion of topics raised on "a certain website" is banned because none of the accusations levelled there can be considered concrete, and the information is usually gained through means the majority of the SHC community isn't happy with.
As such, discussion of these topics is banned until they are given legitimacy, such as CCP commenting on them. Once this happens, people are free to discuss as much as they want, within the confines of a civil atmosphere (this is surprisingly tricky for a lot of people).
--
|
Vando
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 07:43:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Mud Pandemonium
Not everyone uses throwaway hotmail accounts to converse with CCP/ISD, some of us use e-mail accounts that are for business purposes only.
Then you should probably not be using them to communicate with CCP/ISD in the first place, no?
--
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|