Emsigma
Contraband Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
   |
Posted - 2007.06.12 16:45:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Johana Walker
1) The T20 incident.
That was well ****** up and I don't understand why on earth T20 was not fired and maybe also prosecuted since it most likely was a breach against his contract.
Originally by: Johana Walker
2) The TenTon Hammer interview of Magnus, CCP's CEO sounds like a Blacklight alt
Sounds fair to me. GoonSwarm HAS been making up ridiculous accusations that has been proven false over and over again.
Originally by: Johana Walker
3) Broken trade routes in 0.0 allowing BoB to generate 2.2B a day http://
What stops you for doing the same thing? YOu can run exactly the same thing with a carrier or dread fleet as well. This has literarly been around since eve started. Back in Exodus you could do this with Protein trade goods and some POS parts, then you could do it with Consumer Electronics and now you can do it with Plutonium.
Originally by: Johana Walker
4) The introduction of bugged 10/10 complexes on continous respawn on BoB space.
You are thinking of RA, not BoB.
Originally by: Johana Walker
5) The addition of a disporportionate number of complexes and high value roid belts added to Delve back in Exodus.
I might be wrong now, but was Delve even BoB space when Exodus was launched? I remember NORAD being afraid of BoB attacking them so that they could use Outer Ring as a staging point against Fountain.
Originally by: Johana Walker
6) CCP ssystem cap prohibting the D2 support fleet from jump bridging in during the battle of F-T (The support fleet would have brought the system over the unanounced cap).
Fair point, and CCP has always been EXTREMLY bad at communicating important limits like this.
Originally by: Johana Walker
7) POS bowling being ruled as an explint within 24 hours of Goonswarm aquiring their first supercap ship.
Are you saying that it should not be an exploit or do you say that they wanted AAA to steal BoB's stuff and BoB to steal stuff, but just wanted to punish GoonFleet?
Originally by: Johana Walker
8) Rumored disproportionate disciplinary actions taken by GM's, specifically that BoB members were allowed to account share while other alliances had members banned for the same practices.
This is something I have been complaining about since the start of EVE. The fact that the GM's are not trained and does not have any kind of routines what so ever, but cases are handled on an ad-hook base every single time.
Originally by: Johana Walker
9) CCP both condones TS spying and allows its employees to join player organizations that make no secret that they engage in this practice (which is illegal).
I didn't know that CCP was condoning TS spying, but if so then I agree with them. How you can think that a player that plays the game in his regular corp and on their TS can be a spy is out of my world.
Originally by: Johana Walker
Or as one coalition leader put it in a deleted post, everybody is hanging trying to hang on and hope that the game mechanics pendulem swings back against BoB with Rev 2.0.
No, a few of the trouble makers are looking for more spins that they can pull, more things to suspect CCP for and more things to discredit CCP with.
Some players are hanging in there and hoping for some kind of change of game mechanics that would only penalize BoB, but no one else.
Most players are just playing the game and enjoying it and could not care less about any pro-CCP or anti-CCP bull**** at all and are contributing to EVE as the only live game with "the butterly effect" out there.
---
|