| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
cosmoray
   |
Posted - 2007.11.20 04:14:00 -
[1]
Might help if you gave more detail about assets.
1. Minerals - what and how much
2. What BPO's exactly
3. POS and fittings
4. Ships
Will help shareholders decide if a partial liquidation may make sense, and a discussion can be made about the BPO/BPC's.
p.s ALT post of a private investor
|
cosmoray
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 22:10:00 -
[2]
Some interesting maths:
Assuming that Wylker voted his share blocks (either 51 or 66%), and that no one else voted for continued prodcution, it would mean:
1. (51% Wylker share vote). That only 61% of all shares were voted
2. (66% Wylker share vote). That 79.5% of the total share holding was voted.
Of the shares that Wylker DOES NOT having voting power with it means (assuming above):
35% of people voted for other T2 production, and
65% of people voted for Liquidation.
I think option 2 looks very plausable. Wylker needs to provide screenshots or it is likely he voted with his shares.
|
cosmoray
|
Posted - 2007.11.27 04:26:00 -
[3]
Edited by: cosmoray on 27/11/2007 04:28:02
Edited by: cosmoray on 27/11/2007 04:27:14
Edited by: cosmoray on 27/11/2007 04:26:11
Some more AMAZING maths, to counter Wylker's statement that he didn't vote.
Scenario 1. If Wylker didn't vote his 8001 shares, so 4000 shares voted:
1. 83.0097491876% means that 3320.39 shares voted for option A
2. 5.84117990167% means that 233.6472 shares voted for option B
3. 11.1490709108% means that 445.9628 shares voted for option C
OK who has been voting with SHARE FRACTIONS.
Scenario 2. If Wylker did vote his 8001 shares.
1. 83.0097491876% means that 9962 shares voted for option A
2. 5.84117990167% means that 701 shares voted for option B
3. 11.1490709108% means that 1338 shares voted for option C
Now seeing as you can't vote with share fractions, and scenario 2 has nice round share votes, me thinks Wylker is telling a slight mis-truth on his non voting.
The vote fractions show pretty clearly he must have voted.
The problem is if the 8001 votes are removed it looks like Option A still wins.
Seeing as Wylker said he wouldn't vote, and it clearly looks like he did, isn't it time he starts talking the truth and either re-vote or buyback.
|
cosmoray
|
Posted - 2007.11.27 20:08:00 -
[4]
Sorry Wylker numbers don't lie, there is no alternative vote outcome that proves you didn't vote. Maybe all spare votes defaulted to option A.
In the interests as fairness for the vote please set up:
1. Liquidation
2. T2 other production
3. Carry on as before
This will help with the potential default voting. Also we can run the numbers again, with the vote details.
note: Now that you don't want to spend as much time running the IPO any longer why are you even bothering with the vote. Give the money back and move on.
|
cosmoray
|
Posted - 2007.11.28 14:15:00 -
[5]
Ricdic can you copy the E-bank vote results here.
I am only interested in the values with the percentage of people who voted in.
e.g (Option 1. 11.209631%/100)
where 100 is the % of people who voted, in E-banks case hopefully less than 100. This will help give a feel to the look of the new PSI vote.
What we know:
1. Voting system seems to work
2. PSI has 12001 total voting shares
3. We will be able to accurately account for the voting outcomes and decide what blocks of shares are voted.
4. If Wylker DOES NOT vote (as he promised) and everyone else DOES the max percentage of voters should be around 33%.
This would look like:
Option 1 (22.9863681/33).
etc.....
|
cosmoray
|
Posted - 2007.11.30 13:41:00 -
[6]
Is a 2nd vote going ahead?
has it ended? results?
|
| |
|