|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
Petition Blizzard
746
   |
Posted - 2012.01.10 20:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
If I'm ever actually around when this is happening, I'll be there.
|
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
Petition Blizzard
776
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 20:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
While I find it sad to see any segment of the game lose players, I do rather like all the empty wormholes I've been finding. And rising MNR prices make my shiny ship habit much easier to sustain. |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
hotpot inc
785
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 18:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:We're not all of one unified motivation. While many of us are motivated by the tears, some are motivated by things like the economics of it, or the elitism of the incursion-runners. Or all of those things. Or none of those things.
Personally, I just like watching fleets of shiny ships running from one end of empire to the other chasing the latest incursion to get a few hours in before it gets closed again. It's...majestic. |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
hotpot inc
786
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aren Dar wrote:Well, CCP themselves claim that there is no big problem with inflation across the whole of the New Eden economy, and all the statistics they've released tend to back that up. They re-iterate that claim in the CSM minutes.
There are localised rises in some items, but that seems to be more about demand/supply rebalancing than indicative of large scale macro economic changes.
I'd be curious to see if the anti-mom campaign has any significant impact on the economy if it goes on for a month. I'm especially interested in PLEX prices, and also certain faction mods and shiny ships that are popular top-tier ships for incursioners. |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
hotpot inc
788
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 21:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Elson Tamar wrote:I wondered how long it would take for someone to realise that if they wanted to hit incursions this was the way to do it. .
The Skunkworks talked about doing it months ago, we just never had the numbers. It took Lead Farmers and Brick getting involved before it became a reality. |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
hotpot inc
791
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 22:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Don't forget Lead Farmers man! They were awesome through the whole thing. |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1071
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
Phased Veldspar wrote:Nice. I like it. Best way for CCP can take care of the High Sec Incursions would not be to remove them but simply apply some logic: The longer an Incursion, the more damage done and the less ISK Concord can issue. Also, Concord should be paying for results: beating back the incursion fleet. So: Incursions do not reward players with ISK until the Mothership is destroyed. The amount of ISK earned is diminished for each hour the mothership is left up (law of diminishing returns). End result: Incursion Farmers will have to kill the mothership quickly if they intent to receive any decent reward. Since Low Sec isn't cared for as much by Concord, the law of diminishing returns is not as intense (less damage done that Concord has to fix). Null Sec would have little to no diminishing returns since loss to Concord is minimal, but Concord does not want Sansha to have a greater foothold. 
That's essentially what I proposed back in November. Concord doesn't approve of farming and reduces the payout on all incursions sites to 50% after a certain length of time. This makes it more profitable to end the incursion so a new one starts up.
It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |
|
|
| |
|