|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
   |
Posted - 2007.07.25 03:03:00 -
[1]
gf
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 03:45:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Swirler
Good try SPARTA, ya got blob-ganked, that's all there is to it.
better than... blob-fail I suppose.
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 05:50:00 -
[3]
I once swallowed a penny and I found it after. OMG?????????
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 08:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Roger Arko
Edited by: Roger Arko on 25/07/2007 07:38:34
I find it amusing how Tri always chooses the stronger side to fight. First, when MC with allies were steamrolling D2, IRON and others in the North the Tri attacked the Northern Coalition who were running with tail between their legs at that moment. After that when Rzr/MM and allies attacked T1TS in Tenal and when it became obvious the T1TS will fall, the Tri decided to go against weaker alliances in Deklein who therefor had to pull out from the Tenal to defend their homes against Tri.
You guys are a class act. Not. 
P.S. Saying "Epic fight" when your opponents are outnumbered both in ships, ships fitting and SP is kinda hypocripsy. But whatever. I guess it's a big fun for Tri to fight with minimal challenge.
We didn't go into Tenal because we did NOT want space at that time. We only wanted to roam and find targets etc. We invaded Deklin to provoke fights, and afterwards decided its a nice place to live as well. If you think Tri always chooses the stronger side to fight, why did we have many nights where it was 100 vs. 250, and we continued to persevere and continue?
Also, simply count your NAPs, their duration, and compare them to our Naps. nuff said.
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 09:00:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Zerv on 25/07/2007 09:01:37
Originally by: Roger Arko
There is no wonder if the properly configured fleet of experienced players in t2 / faction fitted ships with good FC's beat the s**t out of less organized swarm of t1 cruiser, BC's and frigs? ;)
Point taken, but your a little off. The two main advantages we had were better FC's, and t2 guns which allowed us to dictate range. Another thing to keep in mind is that people in Tri LOVE to PvP. People actually run out of isk pvping, and are forced to rat. The way EVE's game mechanics work is that people who are better fighters usually prevail. And that's what led to the Deklein eviction. C'est la vie.
edit: In almost all engagements, you guys had as many BS as us. Using the t1 cruiser, bc, frigate excuse doesn't work in this case.
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 09:19:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Roger Arko
Edited by: Roger Arko on 25/07/2007 09:15:00
Originally by: Zerv
edit: In almost all engagements, you guys had as many BS as us. Using the t1 cruiser, bc, frigate excuse doesn't work in this case.
This is not true. Check the kb's. Majority of engagement Tri did have more t2 fitted BS's usually with strong support of command ships and HAC's. I'm not saying that you not facing the BS's. You do, but in either less amounts or poorly fitted. Not to mention the SP difference. I bet most of Tri pilots have BS skills at V which also makes a big difference.
My point was: if Tri love the pvp and the challenge - there are much better targets out there. Razor for instance would give you pretty good fights with minimal blobage. In Deklein you either get badly outblobbed which turn the fights into lag-fest OR you face the equal or less in numbers enemy group with much worse fitting and organization than you have and you simply melt 'em fast with minimal to no challenge for your t2/faction hacs, command ships and recons. Correct me if im wrong.
whats your point though, we won, so obviously we are better skilled or equipped or something.
You guys lost the fight, does saying it was because we are less skilled or equipped somehow save face? Should we have flown in t1 ships to make all things equal? This is reality, things are not fair for everyone.
And btw, saying we don't fight Razor etc.... uhh... we have fought them. Morsus Mihi are decent pvpers, Pandemic know how to bring it as well, check our killboards we kill them too. We kill everyone(and die as well). You were next door to us, what did you expect...
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 09:21:00 -
[7]
we killed 4 MM carriers last week... I mean c'mon Roger... are you trolling or being serious?
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 09:28:00 -
[8]
Originally by: trouser boy
So did it really 'desync' or are people just saying it did because they don't really understand it?
No Tri pilots de-sync'd, there was only immense lag. idk if Sparta de-sync'd or not, but I'm sure people are getting "lag" mixed up with "de-sync".
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.26 01:26:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Zerv on 26/07/2007 01:26:49
seems to me a different picture is being painted... I really think you may be getting de-sync confused.
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.26 01:27:00 -
[10]
gf Giamilton
|
|
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.27 01:30:00 -
[11]
Had we not called on RZR/MM/Pandemic for help that ONE day, you guys would just have been delaying the inevitable. No offense.
|
Zerv
Wreckless Abandon
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.07.27 01:32:00 -
[12]
Originally by: sparkvolt
Originally by: Zerv
Had we not called on RZR/MM/Pandemic for help that ONE day, you guys would just have been delaying the inevitable. No offense.
You remind me of Agent Smith...
you guys arn't going to get fabulous at fleet battles overnight. That's my point. Anyways dinner time, cya.
|
|
|
| |
|