| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CardboardSword42
Applied Eugenics
   |
Posted - 2007.07.29 12:44:00 -
[1]
IAC get paid to rent regions they don't own and ensure that farmers don't NPCin their region. Sounds like win win for IAC and it also lowers the ammount of isk being sold for money because they would've NPC'd in 0.0 anyways and this way they're losing a couple billion isk a week.
The idea that CCP won't deal with isk farmers becuase they're in IAC is both ridiculously stupid and unfounded. If an account is found to have sold isk for real money, that account will be banned no matter what alliance or corporation that person is in. Having this corp in IAC has no bearing what so ever on their legitimacy in the eyes of a GM. In addition Tyrax pretty much agrees they're illegitimate but would rather make isk and not have them in his space than have to deal with them. Your arguments about why CCP are less likely do deal with farmers are totally warrantless.
I'm Ex-Biomass, that makes me cool
But now I'm KOS and that makes me cooler 8)
|
CardboardSword42
Applied Eugenics
|
Posted - 2007.07.29 14:14:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Ephemeron
Originally by: CardboardSword42
The idea that CCP won't deal with isk farmers becuase they're in IAC is both ridiculously stupid and unfounded. If an account is found to have sold isk for real money, that account will be banned no matter what alliance or corporation that person is in. Having this corp in IAC has no bearing what so ever on their legitimacy in the eyes of a GM. In addition Tyrax pretty much agrees they're illegitimate but would rather make isk and not have them in his space than have to deal with them. Your arguments about why CCP are less likely do deal with farmers are totally warrantless.
And if CCP does ban them. Wouldn't CCP also have to punish the legitimate players for knowingly aiding isk farmers? Wouldn't CCP, at the very least, have to take away all the ISK that IAC recieved from these farmers?
Does IAC hope it'll never come to that?
It's not aiding the isk farmers at all really. They're paying to rent hostile space, all they're doing is getting screwed out of a billion isk a week and potential ratting space because IAC prevents them from ratting in friendly space. They aren't aiding isk farmers really, just exploiting them.
Taking ingame isk for the use of space is not a EULA violation, IAC would not have violated the EULA because they did not pay real money for the isk. W
I'm Ex-Biomass, that makes me cool
But now I'm KOS and that makes me cooler 8)
|
CardboardSword42
Applied Eugenics
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 16:48:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Ephemeron
Edited by: Ephemeron on 30/07/2007 14:11:03
Originally by: Taurequis
As mentioned before its not illigal to spend all your time npc'ing. So without any evidence saying their selling isk for real cash why should IAC not have them in their space?
Is it because some of their members are from the far east? That smacks of racism to me.
Taur
You missed the point where IAC admits to decieving and abusing that corp even tho it is in their alliance.
Even if buescrew is legit, surely you can't defend IAC for choosing to use such foul tactics? abusing their own member corp while it's too dumb to realize what's going on (probably not dumb, just clueless about the game cause all they care for is isk farming)
Any real corp would quickly figure out what is happening and realize that they don't need IAC.
I love how you've changed your view from the original post of "We need to punish isk farmers in every way possible and being in IAC rewards them by lending legitimacy" has totally changed into "look how IAC treats its member corps"
I'm Ex-Biomass, that makes me cool
But now I'm KOS and that makes me cooler 8)
|
| |
|