|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2691
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 14:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cry more, deprived minebear
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2691
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 14:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
To expand - why do you have this massive sense of entitlement that you should get these really quite advantageous implants at rock bottom prices? If so: X-type mods for everyone! (Yes, I know there are huge differences in obtaining mindlinks and X-types, but the point remains.)
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2697
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 19:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:Bumblefck wrote:To expand - why do you have this massive sense of entitlement that you should get these really quite advantageous implants at rock bottom prices? If so: X-type mods for everyone! (Yes, I know there are huge differences in obtaining mindlinks and X-types, but the point remains.) You are trolling, but I'll bite because people might not notice. Why? The OP already pointed out why. Because the current prices are a secondary result of changing storyline missions, not a specific change to mindlinks the increase the price, which has been reasonably priced in the past. If CCP wants to change the status quo, fine. However, its highly unlikely they do since they usually announce such changes (PI.is a good example) and as the OP stated well, the status quo should be restored. But I'm sure you think we should 'cry more' right? (P.S. I already have several mindlinks)
Did they announce the change to loot tables that caused Y-T8 MWDs and all the rest to plummet in price?
Again...you're basically restating what the OP has said - that they are upset that the drop rate has effectively been nerfed, and that the price has risen as a result.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2698
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 13:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
No, I'm indifferent about it - all I'm saying is "So what if CCP nerfed the effective drop rate of these Mindlinks?" Does that really give anyone cause to complain about them (without appearing as if they are whining)?
By this logic, therefore, should we not all start complaining about how pricey Estamel's Invulns. are because the drop rate is particularly low?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2789
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 16:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
I, too, would like to be able to produce HG Slave sets from tritanium and farts as they are essential to the operation of my Damnation
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2799
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 09:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Industrialists are not and should not ever be immune from the whims of the RNG, whether relating to drop rate or mission distribution. If CCP does something to 'rectify' this, then I for one will be demanding free Estamel's Invulnerability Fields for my Ibis (as I cannot tank level 4 missions without them)!
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2801
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 16:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Bumblefck wrote: I for one will be demanding free Estamel's Invulnerability Fields for my Ibis (as I cannot tank level 4 missions without them)! you are doing something wrong...since birth apparently
Bit rich that you wrote that "sprays Bumblefck repellent" on the previous page, and then go on to directly quote me. Should've expected something like that from you, though...
By the way, I'm obviously not doing anything as wrong as you are, because you were/are: I) mining in a hulk/mackinaw/whatever, II) getting said barge blown up and III), just for emphasis again, you mining in the first instance.
fail fail fail
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2801
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 16:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
It's nice having Internet Stalkers/fanbois, but it only looks bad on oneself if they are of a rather poor quality, like Crystal Icebucket here
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2823
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 11:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:What ????? ![Shocked](https://forums-archive.eveonline.com/Images/Emoticons/ccp_shocked.png)
I know you're doubly afflicted with head-softness and ADHD, but do please try to keep up.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
![Bumblefck Bumblefck](https://images.evetech.net/characters/1391276264/portrait?size=64)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2827
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 09:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
August Guns wrote:Bumblefck wrote:Industrialists are not and should not ever be immune from the whims of the RNG, whether relating to drop rate or mission distribution. If CCP does something to 'rectify' this, then I for one will be demanding free Estamel's Invulnerability Fields for my Ibis (as I cannot tank level 4 missions without them)! Nice straw man. My point, as you so graciously ignored, was to not deflate the price, but to remove arbitrary mechanics for a utility item whilst simultaneously creating a new market. The price is irrelevant; the goal is to involve more players in the process.
You say you would like to remove arbitrary mechanics, but you fail to acknowledge that this is a game and as such everything is arbitrary (i.e., CCP wills it and it is so). It seems to me that the mechanics are working just fine - it is a powerful implant, and as such should be a fairly rare item.
Working as intended imo
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |
|
|
|
|