| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Brutor Shaun
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 07:30:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro
Originally by: Brutor Shaun
Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro One approach that no-one seems to have mentioned would be to consider the efficiency of afterburners & MWDs, which appear to operate against a frictional force proportional to a ship's velocity, whose magnitude can be worked out. For a ship moving (for simplicity) at maximum velocity, we can make an assumption about the MWD/AB efficiency and from that the amount of energy consumed per cycle can be derived.
Huh?
Ok, I'll now try actually applying this, since it does require a bit of work.
The equation of motion, in EVE, for a ship accelerating from rest is
V(t) = Vmax*(1-e^(-t/(AM)))
where A is a ship's modified agility and M is its modified mass divided by 10^6.
Compare this to the equation of motion of a particle falling from rest under Newtonian gravity, experiencing drag directly proportional to its speed:
V(t) = mg/b*(1-e^(-bt/m))
This corresponds to a force of magnitude mg-bv. In EVE, the mg part can be thought of as the thrust of the engine and the bv part is some sort of 'viscous resistance'.
We need to find b, so we equate the above to get b = 10^6/A. We're getting somewhere!
For this example, I'm going to choose a Crow with a 1mn Afterburner II. For simplicity, I'm ignoring skills & other effects (they can be allowed for later in terms of efficiency bonuses).
Without the afterburner, Vmax = 425m/s, A = 3.1 and m = 10^6. With the afterburner, Vmax = 425 * 1.35 * 1500000/(500000 + 1000000) = 573.75 and m = 1500000. A is unaffected.
Now consider the work being done over 1 metre at maximum velocity in each case. Without the afterburner, work done = force * distance = b * Vmax = 10^6/A * Vmax = 10^6/3.1 * 425 = 1.37*10^8 J
With the afterburner, the work being done is 1.85*10^8 J. So the afterburner is doing 4.79*10^7 J of useful work per metre. It has to use 22 'eve units' of energy every 10 seconds, so in one second (over 425m), it uses 2.2 eve units, and does 2.03*10^10 J of useful work.
Assuming that the efficiency of this afterburner is roughly 20% (feel free to come up with your own figure here), this implies that 1 eve unit is roughly 4.6*10^10 J, or 46 gigajoules.
Oh, I see now. Why didn't you say that the first time? 
Bookmark Idea - My skills
|

Zorinna
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 10:28:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Lady Caeser How about measuring in George Michaels ?
My dreadnought is a Phoenix and has the power capacity of 79,681 George Michaels.
the correct term for "George Michaels" would be "Homofagatrons"
|

Zorinna
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 10:36:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Pilk
In other news, the computers in Eve are not all that impressive, compared to the power-generation facilities.
--P
Which explains why Eve Target tracking and intercept (for both projectile and missiles) sucks as badly as it does even at what would be considered "POINT BLANK" Ranges for Space Based Warfare... Can someone teach CCP how to spell target prediction? anyone??
|

Arron S
Gallente Rampage Eternal Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 11:15:00 -
[64]
Edited by: Arron S on 12/08/2007 11:14:43 Volts maybe??
A Video arcade monitor can hold around 15,000 to 25,000 volts
|

Stitcher
Caldari legion of qui Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 11:16:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Stitcher on 12/08/2007 11:15:51 Tera-Farads, most likely.... - The game is not the problem. The problem is that you are not adapting to the game.
|

Dark Shikari
Caldari Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 19:26:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Kweel Nakashyn
Originally by: Winterblink Edited by: Winterblink on 10/08/2007 14:01:53 Farads, yes. I would imagine the EVE ones are measured in some sickeningly large denomination of Farads since people use like 5F caps in car stereos so their brake lights don't dim with every beat of the music.
Also I had an instructor in college rig up a tiny cap (say the size of your thumbnail) to a power supply and had everyone move over to one side of the room. The thing blew crap everywhere when it popped, and was as loud as a low-caliber pistol.
5F is HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE
Agreed, I once had the job of handling some very very large electronic equipment.
They had capacitors which I think were measured in the millifarads... and were 30cm wide, 15cm deep, and 60cm high. And they hooked up dozens of them to each other and ran them at 30,000 volts.
The resistors were about 75cm long and 15cm wide, and were filled with liquid.
These were used to power X-ray pulse generators that were used to simulate nuclear bombs.
23 Member
EVE Video makers: save EVE-files bandwidth! Use the H.264 AutoEncoder! |

Pilk
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 19:28:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Arron S Edited by: Arron S on 12/08/2007 11:14:43 Volts maybe??
A Video arcade monitor can hold around 15,000 to 25,000 volts
The dialectric field strength of air is around 30 kV/cm. So if you've ever made an inch-long spark from static electricity, you were dealing with (ballpark) 75,000 Volts.
Voltage is just a measurement of difference of potential. It implies absolutely nothing about the force behind that difference.
--P
Kosh: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. |

Malcanis
High4Life Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 19:29:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Lady Caeser So we have
CPU = Tf (Teraflops) Powergrid usage Mw (Megawatts) And then power in the capacitor is stored in... what? units
Anybody know what the prime fiction says on this?
Capacitors store energy, which always has the unit of "Joules".
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |

Maaku
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 20:11:00 -
[69]
Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro As for the peak output of a typical ship's capacitor, this is roughly 2.4*cap size/cap recharge time iirc. So for a Raven (without skills etc), this would be 11 units per second, or about 500 Gigawatts; this is equivalent to the *electrical* output of about 300 nuclear power stations.
Total world electrical power consumption
Since I don't know how the terms map, I'll just ask: Given those numbers, how many Ravens, assuming that they were wired into the powergrid, would supply Earth's electrical usage demand?
|

Spenz
Gallente Dark Knights of Deneb Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 20:14:00 -
[70]
OMG Macro powerplants!
If I had an Alt I would probably post with it... |

Sheriff Jones
Amarr Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.08.12 20:33:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Brutor Shaun Wiggly-Amps.....perhaps?
I'd say use bits instead 
So yeah, i have a problem with being serious, but it's the almost smallest problem i have. |

vanBuskirk
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:35:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Maaku
Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro As for the peak output of a typical ship's capacitor, this is roughly 2.4*cap size/cap recharge time iirc. So for a Raven (without skills etc), this would be 11 units per second, or about 500 Gigawatts; this is equivalent to the *electrical* output of about 300 nuclear power stations.
Total world electrical power consumption
Since I don't know how the terms map, I'll just ask: Given those numbers, how many Ravens, assuming that they were wired into the powergrid, would supply Earth's electrical usage demand?
The figures are given in billion kWh/year. Given that 1 year is about 8770 hours, this means that unit is equivalent to 114MW.
Let's use the 2010 figures; given figure is approx 16400, which is 18640MW (18 gigawatts). This figure seems a little low to me, but let's go with it. You always have to allow for power demand peaks, so double it: 37280MW. A Raven with no engineering skill (yeah right!) has a PG of 9500MW, so the answer is; four. This is ignoring the fact that any ship must have more power than the stated amount, to run such things as the engines.
Yes, four. A typical tier 2 BS supplies power equivalent to a quarter of an entire planet's demand. Dreads? Let's not go there.
---------------------------------------------- "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."
|

Azure Skyclad
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2007.10.15 18:53:00 -
[73]
Edited by: Azure Skyclad on 15/10/2007 18:53:43 I don't know if PF mentions anywhere about how the energy is stored. Electrical capacitance is not the only method of storing energy though. Ships may well be packing some of these. Homopolar Generators
One possible alternative at least.
Edit:grammar
http://ultravixen.co.uk/ |

YunFu Yan
Yan Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.10.15 19:12:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Azure Skyclad Edited by: Azure Skyclad on 15/10/2007 18:53:43 I don't know if PF mentions anywhere about how the energy is stored. Electrical capacitance is not the only method of storing energy though. Ships may well be packing some of these. Homopolar Generators
One possible alternative at least.
Edit:grammar
Nah, the currently most efficient technology to store the amounts of energy needed for high energy weapon discharges such as blasters, railguns or lasers would be compulsators. The US-Navy powers their experimental railguns with them too.
Yan Enterprises - We mean business. |

Sylvia Lafayette
|
Posted - 2007.10.15 20:36:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Lady Caeser
Originally by: Roz Akanit Useless fact: 35000 joules is approx 8 calories. Which is about 1.5% of the energy in a cheeseless ig mac.
WTB: Ship that runs on cheeseburgers
WTB DRONES THAT DO THAT TOO!
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |