EVE Search - Lowest # ships on a highsec freighter gank?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Lowest # ships on a highsec freighter gank?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Danari Amarr Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.08.11 10:47:00 - [1] Tri killed a freighter in hisec today carrying about 5bil in ships n mods using 7 bs and 5 bc. Was wondering if there's been anyone to kill a freighter with fewer ships. Seems bloody dangerous these days to fly a freighter if it only takes a dozen or so insured ships to loot its burning wreck.
maCH'EttE Veto.	Posted - 2007.08.11 10:50:00 - [2] Nice work. I foresee many more people trying this, if it takes so few ships... Originally by: Devil Hanzo (ISD) I got pwned!
DarkElf Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2007.08.11 11:00:00 - [3] why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. the last gank i heard about was around 15 domis, sounds like this is one of the fewest. DE
SPIONKOP Caldari Macabre Votum INVICTUS.	Posted - 2007.08.11 11:12:00 - [4] Edited by: SPIONKOP on 11/08/2007 11:13:06 Originally by: DarkElf why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. I have been told the bug that prevented can scanning was fixed a few months ago, so it makes no difference. Does seem a bit one sided that such a small fleet can take down a freighter in high sec sapce. IMHO insurance should not pay out if you lose your ship to concord, that would shift the balance a little. Space For Rent. 100mil ISK/Week.
Patricia Bateman	Posted - 2007.08.11 11:30:00 - [5] Originally by: SPIONKOP Edited by: SPIONKOP on 11/08/2007 11:13:06 Originally by: DarkElf why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. I have been told the bug that prevented can scanning was fixed a few months ago, so it makes no difference. Does seem a bit one sided that such a small fleet can take down a freighter in high sec sapce. IMHO insurance should not pay out if you lose your ship to concord, that would shift the balance a little. perhaps if it was in a can with a password on it they wouldn't be able to loot it?
Taipan Gedscho Muzzletov Gewaltski Inc.	Posted - 2007.08.11 11:32:00 - [6] they could then just repackage it. im wondering... i heard there was a bug, that sentry drones fire on after the ship that launched them went kerrrpow from concord. any details on boarderline exploits involved in this ongoing freighter gankage? Only you can save mmorpgs - Stop crying for nerfs today!
maCH'EttE Veto.	Posted - 2007.08.11 11:44:00 - [7] Originally by: SPIONKOP IMHO insurance should not pay out if you lose your ship to concord, that would shift the balance a little. Agreed TBH. Or any Faction Police / Sentry or Station fire, for that matter. Originally by: Devil Hanzo (ISD) I got pwned!
Nyck Not Your Common Killers	Posted - 2007.08.11 11:47:00 - [8] Originally by: SPIONKOP Edited by: SPIONKOP on 11/08/2007 11:13:06 Originally by: DarkElf why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. I have been told the bug that prevented can scanning was fixed a few months ago, so it makes no difference. Yes, but if the can pops, do does everything in it. Or did they change that, as well? ----------------------------------------------- Could someone tally how many times this topic has been beat to death?
Danari Amarr Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.08.11 12:47:00 - [9] I believe drones deliver the primary dps. This has been true since the first hisec gank. As to cans, their contents are delivered all or nothing based on the coin toss of whether the can survives.
Takahashi Arran coracao ardente Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.08.11 12:50:00 - [10] More importantly why wasn't i invited to this gank

Spaced Skunk D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.08.11 12:56:00 - [11] Originally by: Danari I believe drones deliver the primary dps. This has been true since the first hisec gank. As to cans, their contents are delivered all or nothing based on the coin toss of whether the can survives. Nah mate, neutron blasters 4tw.
Cpt Fina Insult to Injury	Posted - 2007.08.11 15:08:00 - [12] Freighters need slots ffs! Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -TheDagda ([email protected])
Lance Fighter Amarr	Posted - 2007.08.11 15:29:00 - [13] Wonder... how many cruisers with 1600 plates and 5x sentry drones will I need to instapop a freighter?
RuleoftheBone Minmatar Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2007.08.11 17:26:00 - [14] Edited by: RuleoftheBone on 11/08/2007 17:26:57 "Was wondering if there's been anyone to kill a freighter with fewer ships" On 21 June 2007 9 Veto pilots killed a freighter in low sec partially under sentry fire. Gang consisted of: 1xAstarte 1xNighthawk 1xMunin 1xVaga 2xHurricanes 1xVexor 1xEnyo 1xFlycatcher (don't ask ) 1xBlackbird And an excellent covops pilot probed him after logoffski Video should be available on Veto public forums. Your loot was far better though. EDIT...noticed you referred to high-sec. Still...not too shabby! "Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the ** out of my way" General George Patton USA
Chode Rizoum Minmatar Endgame. Cruel Intentions	Posted - 2007.08.11 18:23:00 - [15] Originally by: RuleoftheBone Edited by: RuleoftheBone on 11/08/2007 17:26:57 "Was wondering if there's been anyone to kill a freighter with fewer ships" On 21 June 2007 9 Veto pilots killed a freighter in low sec partially under sentry fire. Gang consisted of: 1xAstarte 1xNighthawk 1xMunin 1xVaga 2xHurricanes 1xVexor 1xEnyo 1xFlycatcher (don't ask ) 1xBlackbird And an excellent covops pilot probed him after logoffski Video should be available on Veto public forums. Your loot was far better though. **EDIT...noticed you referred to high-sec. Still...not too shabby! not to ball bust but many have soloed freighters in low sec My Personal Killboard
Sidewayzracer Caldari Murder-Death-Kill Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.08.11 19:05:00 - [16] Edited by: Sidewayzracer on 11/08/2007 19:05:32 concord jams drones so they then attack concord i have fraps of them chasing after concord also this frighter popd before concord arrived this guy was afk in the system for 3 hours once first spotted and best part we ransomed him in low sec the day b4 1 jump out double pwnt. we have done it with 11 ppl but i think was more BS then what we brought 2 this 1. look in my sig thats the guy
unknownuna Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2007.08.11 22:00:00 - [17] In my times in infod on a previous character we killed a freighter in lowsec at a station with 3 BC. It's nothing to be proud of. Highsec ganking either tbh. The loss on the part of the gankers is very small.
T'Renn Vale Heavy Industries Molotov Coalition	Posted - 2007.08.11 23:02:00 - [18] lol @ dude bragging about some veto. gang he was in popping a freighter in lowsec under sentry fire. There were ten of you and you call that a feat? Quite a while back Xonja and I popped one in ama under sentries with just her myrmi and my deimos - at a gate with just the sentries cycling aggro between her and I. It took a long time to bring the freighter down. Of course they didn't drop any loot then, and I sometimes wish that they still didn't. I think that suicide ganking is pretty weaksauce tbh. I never really thought the two of us killing that dude's freigter was that great of an accomplishment. Guess I'm more nber than I thought? Just kidding - I always knew I was nber. --
Flinx Evenstar Minmatar Spartan Industries Cruel Intentions	Posted - 2007.08.12 01:20:00 - [19] Originally by: Chode Rizoum Originally by: RuleoftheBone Edited by: RuleoftheBone on 11/08/2007 17:26:57 "Was wondering if there's been anyone to kill a freighter with fewer ships" On 21 June 2007 9 Veto pilots killed a freighter in low sec partially under sentry fire. Gang consisted of: 1xAstarte 1xNighthawk 1xMunin 1xVaga 2xHurricanes 1xVexor 1xEnyo 1xFlycatcher (don't ask ) 1xBlackbird And an excellent covops pilot probed him after logoffski Video should be available on Veto public forums. Your loot was far better though. **EDIT...noticed you referred to high-sec. Still...not too shabby! not to ball bust but many have soloed freighters in low sec Even me I, erm, like kill things and stuff
hUssmann Caldari Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2007.08.12 01:38:00 - [20] Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Originally by: Chode Rizoum Originally by: RuleoftheBone Edited by: RuleoftheBone on 11/08/2007 17:26:57 "Was wondering if there's been anyone to kill a freighter with fewer ships" On 21 June 2007 9 Veto pilots killed a freighter in low sec partially under sentry fire. Gang consisted of: 1xAstarte 1xNighthawk 1xMunin 1xVaga 2xHurricanes 1xVexor 1xEnyo 1xFlycatcher (don't ask ) 1xBlackbird And an excellent covops pilot probed him after logoffski Video should be available on Veto public forums. Your loot was far better though. **EDIT...noticed you referred to high-sec. Still...not too shabby! not to ball bust but many have soloed freighters in low sec Even me Looks like bone misunderstood the post lol. I'll get the idiot to edit his post when he wakes up. Ginger Magician > You are merely an effective ganker of haulers who runs at the first sign of combat.

Khul Drukath Maelstrom Crew	Posted - 2007.08.12 02:04:00 - [21] I organised a gang of 13 for a freighter suicide hit in highsec for a client, but it was both before the concord boost and it was all BS, so not nearly as good as the one the OP refers to. Anyway my main point is that I used to agree with those here that suggest that insurance should not pay out from a CONCORD death. However I have now changed my opinion because I suspect there are a large number of accidental deaths to concord (think mission runners in npc corps). The hassle of having all of these losses petitioned as a mistake could do more harm than the good caused by suicide attackers not getting insurance. Hire Us
Devian 666 Axe Gang	Posted - 2007.08.12 02:35:00 - [22] Originally by: Khul Drukath I organised a gang of 13 for a freighter suicide hit in highsec for a client, but it was both before the concord boost and it was all BS, so not nearly as good as the one the OP refers to. Anyway my main point is that I used to agree with those here that suggest that insurance should not pay out from a CONCORD death. However I have now changed my opinion because I suspect there are a large number of accidental deaths to concord (think mission runners in npc corps). The hassle of having all of these losses petitioned as a mistake could do more harm than the good caused by suicide attackers not getting insurance. Either pay out insurance to all or have no insurance whatsoever. Too much trouble for accidental deaths to concorde and if insurance is removed then it removes the price floor for ships (ie., cheap bs and bc if the market is oversupplied as no one will suicide ships for insurance if it isn't there). That's a nice cluttered post. I agree I don't have the features to be a holoreel star. Most people have missed the point that this is Mobsters Online and that carebears are at the bottom of the foodchain.
Lance Fighter Amarr	Posted - 2007.08.12 04:28:00 - [23] Insurance for highsec losses should be like 1 month from start of player... You cant really get a 1 month old player in a battleship, with enough support skills, to gank a freighter... well, it MIGHT be possible... but all that work!
Jesnen Amarr Murder-Death-Kill Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.08.12 06:34:00 - [24] Ganking freighters in high sec is impossible, concord is the ruler and protector of all. This thread is lies, all lies.
LMAAAOOOO	Posted - 2007.08.12 11:30:00 - [25] You can do it solo _______________________________________________ Originally by: murder one lmaaaoooo has made it into my sig.
RuleoftheBone Minmatar Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2007.08.12 12:18:00 - [26] Huss is right...I misunderstood the post. No brag intended. Freighters are like Moby ** to me . Ta much for the flames though...I deserved it "Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the ** out of my way" General George Patton USA
Wigglytuff Vale Heavy Industries Molotov Coalition	Posted - 2007.08.12 16:22:00 - [27] Originally by: DarkElf why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. Because it doesn't block a scanner.
LMAAAOOOO	Posted - 2007.08.12 16:57:00 - [28] Edited by: LMAAAOOOO on 12/08/2007 17:03:02 Originally by: Wigglytuff Originally by: DarkElf why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. Because it doesn't block a scanner. What are you doing picking on DE? HMMM? Well, ****, U're too ignorant to know that DE is not ignorant? And courier cans block cargo scanner _______________________________________________ Originally by:** murder one lmaaaoooo has made it into my sig.
Devian 666 Axe Gang	Posted - 2007.08.13 00:48:00 - [29] Originally by: Wigglytuff Originally by: DarkElf why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. Because it doesn't block a scanner. Closing you cargo window blocks the scanner. All you cargo is safe to haul in an untanked ship on autopilot. Do not worry about the ships locking you and scanning your ship they just want to give you a hug. I agree I don't have the features to be a holoreel star. Most people have missed the point that this is Mobsters Online and that carebears are at the bottom of the foodchain.
Arvald Caldari House of Tempers	Posted - 2007.08.13 01:44:00 - [30] Originally by: Devian 666 Originally by: Wigglytuff Originally by: DarkElf why ppl don't carry expensive things in cans i have no idea. Because it doesn't block a scanner. Closing you cargo window blocks the scanner. All you cargo is safe to haul in an untanked ship on autopilot. Do not worry about the ships locking you and scanning your ship they just want to give you a hug. i like to give hugs with cruse missles forum warrior in training [orange] Your signature is beyond the file size allowed on these forums. Emai



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.