EVE Search - HMS Daring

All Channels

Out of Pod Experience

HMS Daring

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Patch86 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.16 17:40:00 - [1] Originally by: Locus Bey One can only hope it sinks or rapid rusts along with all the rest. Stupid waste of money imo Ah yes, because it'll be much less of a waste if it's useless, won't it? Now they've bought the damned thing, we might as well hope it works... Originally by: Gone'Postal Nice. I think they fracked up a little. In the next 10 years, as many as eight T45s could be built, mainly to defend the two large aircraft carriers that were ordered last month. & Ordered: 2000 Either they need a smeg load of new shipyards.. or there going to be out of date before they get 20 off the production line. The year 2000, not 2000 ships --------
Patch86 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.17 12:55:00 - [2] Originally by: Amarria Black Originally by: Calisto Cody I love battleships too :( Originally by: Amarria Black I'm having a tough time coming up with a method of killing them short of target saturation or resource denial. Blob? ^_^ Heh, that would be the saturation part. Fire a missile at an AEGIS crusier, the cruiser swats the missile out of the sky with little effort, uses its over-the-top sensor equipment to find you, and then proceeds to WTFPWN you. Fire 50, and you get a better (albeit more expensive) result. You could build and take along your own one of these: stalemate! Both ships can do nothing but throw missiles at each other and watch them explode at a point about equidistant between the two. The winner? Whichever one brought along the most ammunition! --------
Patch86 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.18 21:03:00 - [3] Thats capitalism for ya. Chinese firms managed to out-perform American firms through exploiting cheap labour, and ended up on top. Time to switch to communism? --------
Patch86 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.20 11:30:00 - [4] Originally by: DarkMatter Edited by: DarkMatter on 20/08/2007 02:54:38 Originally by: Patch86 Thats capitalism for ya. Chinese firms managed to out-perform American firms through exploiting cheap labour, and ended up on top. Time to switch to communism? Hardly, we just need to even out the trade imbalance with China. Only allow China to export to us what they import from us in dollar value. That would pretty much **** their economy over. Only reason they have an economy is becauise of US Wal-Mart shoppers... And there I was thing espirit de capitalism was a free and unrestricted trade environment in which corporations sink or swim solely based on their merits and competitiveness on the open market. If you're willing to accept trade limitations to favour a particular nationality, wouldn't it make sense to employ trade limitations in order to protect the humble consumer too? Because that'd be espirit de socialism instead --------
Patch86 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.20 21:31:00 - [5] Originally by: Xantia Gedur Originally by: Aturi Kuomi Piity they can't use those billions of pounds on homes, helping the poor, the NHS or something worthwhile. Freaking stupid government. It's called a defence budget, they have limited money to put towards military toys and do not touch the money from other departments such as health or education. A very impressive and modern ship although i'm sure they are not releasing its 'full features' to the general public only the ones that you need to know. On the price, 1 bil is nothing, in times we live in it pays to be one step ahead of the enemy. Ahh theres nothing like flopping your international peen on the table and saying 'hey guys look what we got!' Good job Royal Navy Ironically enough, in theory new military technology could be a money saver in the future. If you consider that this is a very small ship that can do the work of several old-tech much larger ships, that means that it'll need to be staffed by less crew, have less bits that need replacing, less fuel being burned, etc. etc. etc... Think, if every ship in the Royal Navy was replaced with the equivalent in fire power of these little guys, that'd be a lot of money being saved. In theory... --------

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.