EVE Search - To CVA

All Channels

Intergalactic Summit

To CVA

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Nerissa Ars ex Discordia GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.08.26 05:13:00 - [31] Originally by: Vlad Cetes They're standing because the Alliance has not begun offensive operations. Believe me we'll smash Providence when the time is right. Perhaps a bit too busy fleeing from their betters in Omist to go on the offensive? Perhaps a bit too busy losing supercapitals in Querious to go on the offensive? I'm sure the CVA will welcome the action if it ever decides to arrive.
Kai Zion Imperial Academy	Posted - 2007.08.26 05:38:00 - [32]
Ikar Kaltin Amarr Imperial Dreams Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.26 11:22:00 - [33] Providence Comes first, we will defend it until the end. Any who do not respect our rules protecting the citizens of the area will be met with the cleansing light of our lasers. AAA know this, and we still shoot them for not respecting the rules of Amarrian space, until they do I will shoot them. If the alliance come, so be it, they will be met by lasers and defeated by our unwavering faith.
The Lamentress	Posted - 2007.08.26 12:02:00 - [34] Originally by: Dalyn Arathon My advice to CVA: Abandon your worthless god, for he will do nothing for you, and begin praying to the altar of RA/Goon. Of course, though, that would require breaking your purpose just as much as being destroyed, wouldn't it? Welcome to the real world, I suppose. The cowards solution?
Dalyn Arathon Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2007.08.26 16:08:00 - [35] Originally by: The Lamentress Originally by: Dalyn Arathon My advice to CVA: Abandon your worthless god, for he will do nothing for you, and begin praying to the altar of RA/Goon. Of course, though, that would require breaking your purpose just as much as being destroyed, wouldn't it? Welcome to the real world, I suppose. The cowards solution? Or the realists'? Because apparently they have some of those.
Mr CynoAlt	Posted - 2007.08.26 17:03:00 - [36] Why all this posturing from Storm Armada? Last I checked you didnt run The Alliance... so until someone credible with a little decision making clout comes along and threatens CVA, I'm pretty sure they don't care in the slightest about your amusing threats.
Becq Starforged Minmatar Ship Construction Services Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.08.26 18:37:00 - [37] Originally by: Andreus Ixiris A choice between the Alliance and CVA? I'm really going to have to decide who I like the least. Hm. Must think about this also... Storm Armada(Alliance) CVA(Amarr) * Brutally conquered the Matari N Y people, enslaving our brethren and raping our livestock * Attempted to do the same to the N Y Gallente people and/or their livestock * Attempted yet again to do the N Y same to the Jovian people; the livestock issue is unknown here * Still engages in the wholesale N Y torture of countless millions in the name of their god * Is proud of all of the above N Y Hm, let me think, let me think... -- Becq Starforged proprietor of Starforge Industries, a subsidiary of Minmatar Ship Construction Services At Starforge Industries, the world of tomorrow is being blown apart today!
Siobhan Amarr Imperial Dreams Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.26 20:37:00 - [38] Edited by: Siobhan on 26/08/2007 20:39:31 Originally by: Siobhan The CVA has never been interested in the great 'Alliance vs Coalition' war between the major 0.0 power blocks, indeed we remain focused on bringing Amarrian civilisation and law and order to Providence and low-sec space. However it has become clear from a variety of sources that various groups on the Alliance side were going to seek our involvement whether we wanted to be involved or not. Indeed our intel indicates that some of the responsibility for recent disruptions in the Providence region lay at the feet of some Alliance commanders. It has become clear that elements of the 'Alliance' clearly seek to destroy our foothold in Amarrian Providence and as a result we have been FORCED into action even if this is something we would rather not have done. However this interference in carrying our our holy mission can no longer be tolerated. Those who see to thwart God's work will pay the price. For Amarr, for God! Death and glory! CLARIFICATION While CVA has decided to assist IAC (for the reasons outlined yesterday) we are not part of the 'Coalition'. Indeed AAA, Goons and several other Coalition alliances remain KOS to us (in Providence) for piracy in Providence (basically not abiding by our NRDS policy in the region). A couple of Coalition groupings had previously agreed to abide by our rules in Providence and were removed from KOS some time ago. This is part of our policy for pacification of the region and applies to the 'Coalition' as much as the 'Alliance'. We apply this policy to all who wish to fly through or operate in Amarrian Providence. We shall not tolerate any interference with our God-given mission from either side. -------------- Avenging Angel --------------
Occasus Vim Minmatar Einherjar Rising	Posted - 2007.08.27 00:33:00 - [39] Originally by: Siobhan CLARIFICATION ... If my understanding of the beast known as 0.0 politics is at all accurate, I don't believe CVA statements will ultimately have a great bearing on whether they are a part of 'The Coalition' or not. Instead, this decision lies with those who may or may not choose CVA as their enemy. Much like the Guardians of Truth (CVA), former Providence space holders Ushra'Khan had a mission in the region; to slow, or ideally halt Amarrian paramilitary expansion, and in the process they gathered around themselves some arguably less than favorable allies, in terms of public opinion. It was then that the enemies of the Ushra'Khan, and the soon to be ones, decided that U'K themselves were pirates, despite all policy clarifications to the contrary. Ultimately, CVA and its allies had the power to remove the U'K foothold in the region. Anti-pirate factions who joined the fight against the freedom fighters did not loudly sound the bells of victory when Unity was taken. The pretenses of piracy, really, mattered little when the dust settled. In the end, it is up to those with power to decide what actions are necessary to achieve their own ends. If they decide a particular entity is a threat, or significant enough nuisance to those ends, it will be the (perhaps arbitrary) interpretation of actions, not words, that decides what happens. Regardless, Providence will undoubtedly maintain its status as a highly interesting region, if not a particularly rich one.
Garreck Amarr Border Defense Consortium Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.27 01:05:00 - [40] Originally by: Occasus Vim Instead, this decision lies with those who may or may not choose CVA as their enemy. This is the reality of the matter... But always has been, really. Which is why we've never shrunk from supporting IAC for simple fear of retaliation.
Jon Engel APEX Unlimited APEX Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.08.27 07:14:00 - [41] Praise the Lord and pass the Ammunition, I suppose?
Redpants Gallente Dead Eagle North Star Confederation	Posted - 2007.08.28 09:48:00 - [42] I find the Alliance revolting cowards. Best of luck to you CVA! Providence will remain free, except maybe for Minmatars and their childrens children. "My once immaculate white pants are now stained from the weak and innocent. I don't wear red."
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2007.08.28 10:14:00 - [43] I'm curious as to whether or not Storm Armada attempted a behind-the-scenes diplomatic solution prior to going public with this bluster. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
zoolkhan Minmatar Freelance Unincorporated Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.08.29 09:31:00 - [44] Originally by: Dalyn Arathon Guess U'K get their way, even if not by their intended methods. Providence burns. Well providence burns already, we can just not take on CVA directly as they double our numbers easily even without their allies. But we targeted their all their allies specifically, and they payedand are still paying the price of backstabbing us and aiding the amarr slaver approach. One hostile alliance lost at least 4-5 corporations in that process, we view this as proof for a burning providence, but the more people with matches and lighters and torches help litting the slaver cloaks the better id say I dont shed a tear for the slavers. Theyre no easy prey though, whomever manages to push them back to their place and give them what they deserve earns my long lasting respect. U'K recruit! . ..i come for our people..
Cadela Fria Amarr Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.08.30 10:32:00 - [45] Edited by: Cadela Fria on 30/08/2007 10:33:08 Truth is truth denied when lamented in words which opposes the acts commited by a man. Lest we forget that sin will come back to Ruin. Indeed it will come, but The Speaker of Truths - Who so counciled and dismembered Aritcio of Kor Azor, to appease it's people and God - was wrong. Ruin shall indeed not come as an uprising, but nor shall it come as a revolution, but as an evolution. An evolution, where all of the endings are waiting to begin. So shall it be, and so we begin. Knowledge is a priviledge, not a right
General Apocalypse Amarr The Merchant Marines	Posted - 2007.08.30 11:44:00 - [46] Originally by: Siobhan The CVA has never been interested in the great 'Alliance vs Coalition' war between the major 0.0 power blocks, indeed we remain focused on bringing Amarrian civilisation and law and order to Providence and low-sec space. However it has become clear from a variety of sources that various groups on the Alliance side were going to seek our involvement whether we wanted to be involved or not. Indeed our intel indicates that some of the responsibility for recent disruptions in the Providence region lay at the feet of some Alliance commanders. It has become clear that elements of the 'Alliance' clearly seek to destroy our foothold in Amarrian Providence and as a result we have been FORCED into action even if this is something we would rather not have done. However this interference in carrying our our holy mission can no longer be tolerated. Those who see to thwart God's work will pay the price. For Amarr, for God! Death and glory! Fire your intel officer and hit Molle or Dianabolic whit a convo and solve the issue . Originally by: Jita Alt DOH, you're right, i'm an idiot >_< Originally by: CCP Morpheus nerf ccp plz Originally by: CCP Oveur To the gankmobile!
Atius Tirawa Minmatar Wreckless Abandon Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.08.30 12:54:00 - [47] This is all very fishy. If I were a freedom fighter, I would be unhappy because I was not resposible for retaking Providence. It would be a shame if CVA fell, and a huge loss if they survive. A lose lose is never a good deal to strike.
Chishan Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.08.30 13:49:00 - [48] Personally, I could care less about retaking Providence. I just want to see the Amarr conquerors die and the traitor Alliances burn. Afterwards the region can be turned into a gigantic Quafe bottling plant for all I care.
ER0X Eternity INC. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.08.30 14:37:00 - [49] Originally by: Siobhan The CVA has never been interested in the great 'Alliance vs Coalition' war between the major 0.0 power blocks, indeed we remain focused on bringing Amarrian civilisation and law and order to Providence and low-sec space. However it has become clear from a variety of sources that various groups on the Alliance side were going to seek our involvement whether we wanted to be involved or not. Indeed our intel indicates that some of the responsibility for recent disruptions in the Providence region lay at the feet of some Alliance commanders. It has become clear that elements of the 'Alliance' clearly seek to destroy our foothold in Amarrian Providence and as a result we have been FORCED into action even if this is something we would rather not have done. However this interference in carrying our our holy mission can no longer be tolerated. Those who see to thwart God's work will pay the price. For Amarr, for God! Death and glory! I have scoured all of GAL-net for any overt meaningful proof to back up the claims laid by the governess and have completely drawn a blank. In addition I have also sent out memoranda to all my intelligence sources in an attempt to decipher any covert, coded or hidden agendas within internal and external broadcasts in search of proofs. I have found absolutely no indication that the Alliance had or has any interest within Providence or its residents. As such I would disagree with this statement in its premise and urge reconsideration. The perception of the eve community lacking open mindedness or imagination, although may hold some truths, draws little relevance or standing in the posturing taken by the Curatores Veritatis representatives in this discussion, save the possible inclusion of a smoke screen. Although the Alliance Curatores Veritatis has long held a kinship with the Alliance International Alcohol Conglomerate forged in a time long before the w***e Thorrk stole her position. The protectorate of Sovereign claimed space in Providence region and on the part of IAC its sovereign claimed space in Catch. The matter is somewhat clouded. I make this suggestion due to the interference of Coalition forces in a Sovereign Alliances space. The Sovereign Alliance to which I am referring is Firmus Ixion. You may well present an argument of protecting your neighboursÆ assets, which in its essence is an honourable sentiment. However where the lines become blurred is when the neighbour you are aligning with is a recognised member of a larger coalition of Alliances attacking another Sovereign Alliances space. At this point, to the hoi polloi and other eve denizens, and quite rightly so, your argument no longer holds water. Might I also point out that a by-product to the stance taken is also, being perceived as a non neutral involvement wither the CVA cares for it or not. In fact by your own directorate and declarations of protection within a NRDS policy throughout the Providence region actions such as these in other regions are tantamount to piracy. Are we now to believe that the Holy Amarrian Empire has decided to expand its borders into Querious, has been reduced to frivolous, heinous acts such as road trips under the auspices of a common thief? If this is the case then it truly is a black day in Amarrian history and possibly the prelude to either the traversal along a darker path in much the same fashion as the covenanterÆs millennia ago or total annihilation. Perhaps therein lays the reasoning, and why there is furore among the community at large.
Kade Jeekin Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.08.30 14:40:00 - [50] I understand that UK's aim was never to take Providence but to hold it against Amarrian expansion, unofficially spearheaded by the CVA paramilitaries. Our bases of operation have been pushed back but the war goes on, although our focus has shifted from CVA itself to its regional allies. CVA seems to feel stable enough to start meddling in others affairs. If it should fall accordingly, I believe many in UK would rejoice and move onwards. They are, after-all, not our main enemy, Amarr is. --------------------------------------- Outface the depths of evil with clarity ---------------------------------------
Garreck Amarr Border Defense Consortium Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.30 15:15:00 - [51] Edited by: Garreck on 30/08/2007 15:19:23 Originally by: ER0X I have scoured all of GAL-net for any overt meaningful proof to back up the claims laid by the governess and have completely drawn a blank. In addition I have also sent out memoranda to all my intelligence sources in an attempt to decipher any covert, coded or hidden agendas within internal and external broadcasts in search of proofs. I have found absolutely no indication that the Alliance had or has any interest within Providence or its residents. I'm sure your investigation, merc, was completely unbaised as well. The decision to send ships was made, and we'll stand by it and face the consequences. We're no stranger to threats or intimidation (you are wrong, by the way; direct threats have been made by certain members of the now so-called "Alliance" forces to the CVA for several years)...and until Alliance forces deploy in Providence, this is a lot of hot air and speculation anyway. By all parties who have spoken here so far. Originally by: ER0X In fact by your own directorate and declarations of protection within a NRDS policy throughout the Providence region actions such as these in other regions are tantamount to piracy. Except, of course, FIX pilots have been long since "kill on sight" for firing on neutrals in Providence anyway.
Bastables Amarr The Aegis Militia Aegis Militia	Posted - 2007.08.30 17:22:00 - [52] Originally by: Cadela Fria Edited by: Cadela Fria on 30/08/2007 10:33:08 Truth is truth denied when lamented in words which opposes the acts commited by a man. Lest we forget that sin will come back to Ruin. Indeed it will come, but The Speaker of Truths - Who so counciled and dismembered Aritcio of Kor Azor, to appease it's people and God - was wrong. Ruin shall indeed not come as an uprising, but nor shall it come as a revolution, but as an evolution. An evolution, where all of the endings are waiting to begin. So shall it be, and so we begin. The filth no longer even try to hide their corruption behind avaraice. Pathetic. Be reclaimed, and be loved
ER0X Eternity INC. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.08.30 17:41:00 - [53] Originally by: Garreck Originally by: ER0X I have scoured all of GAL-net for any overt meaningful proof to back up the claims laid by the governess and have completely drawn a blank. In addition I have also sent out memoranda to all my intelligence sources in an attempt to decipher any covert, coded or hidden agendas within internal and external broadcasts in search of proofs. I have found absolutely no indication that the Alliance had or has any interest within Providence or its residents. I'm sure your investigation, merc, was completely unbaised as well. My investigations are seldom unbiased Garreck, the pursuit of truth can be a difficult often testing maiden. Originally by: Garreck The decision to send ships was made, and we'll stand by it and face the consequences. We're no stranger to threats or intimidation (you are wrong, by the way; direct threats have been made by certain members of the now so-called "Alliance" forces to the CVA for several years)...and until Alliance forces deploy in Providence, this is a lot of hot air and speculation anyway. By all parties who have spoken here so far. I would agree that there lacks any substance in all claims made here and that rhetoric is no substitute for action in these matters. With that said IÆm glad the Amarr brethren are teaching you well in the ways of diplomacy in fact I will be recommending all Amarr within my corporation purchase a Gallente lap dog as they appear easily to mould in ones own image. Originally by: Garreck Originally by: ER0X In fact by your own directorate and declarations of protection within a NRDS policy throughout the Providence region actions such as these in other regions are tantamount to piracy. Except, of course, FIX pilots have been long since "kill on sight" for firing on neutrals in Providence anyway. Who would dream to dictate to GodÆs representatives how to police their claimed inhabited regions of space? Not I! No one has that right with the exception of God. Kill on sight is a status in the region that solely CVA has the right to issue as it deems fit. However moving a task force across two regions to assist an attempted coup d'Ttat on another entity is by far a different prospect to a police action in ones own region. Perhaps comprehension is not one of your strong points, rather noticeable from your reply to my communicate. However I have no doubt the Amarrian brethren will have you schooled in no time, sadly I forget not all are privy to the standard of education set out by Hedion University, C'est la vie!
Garreck Amarr Border Defense Consortium Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.30 18:07:00 - [54] Originally by: ER0X However moving a task force across two regions to assist an attempted coup d'Ttat on another entity is by far a different prospect to a police action in ones own region. Yes, it is. Far different. But it is not hypocrisy, as you implied. An enemy is an enemy. And fighting an enemy is fighting an enemy. That we were called upon to leave our space by an ally to shoot at an organization who is already openly hostile to us is the issue here. That is what the CVA will ultimately be held accountable for. This is not something that needs debated. The CVA took part in an action to support an ally at that ally's request. The CVA is not and will not partake in regular operations against FIX because, as has been stated by most involved parties, it's not in our interest. The CVA will, however, continue to honor our ally's requests on a case-by-case basis. End of discussion. If the Alliance sees fit to act on the CVA's support of an ally by targetting us...then that is the Alliance's concern, and is not really a topic for public disclosure. But attempts to illicit some sort of retraction or sentiments of regret on the CVA's part in this Summit will prove futile.
ER0X Eternity INC. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.08.30 21:41:00 - [55] I see your true nature has surfaced leading you to believe this dialog to be some form of discussion. You are no closer to the truth now than you were when I began this,.,., investigation, in fact we could call it, lets say ,.,., an interview. The interesting aspect of this interrogation is the flippant use of the closing term æend of discussionÆ to then open yet another avenue with further diatribe. On that note common sense would dictate from the perspective of the observer, the observer being the Alliance forces whoever they may be. That should they meet CVA in the field they should expect to be targeted by CVA and considered hostile. In this case it would be prudent to consider the forces of CVA duplicitous and hostile at all times. I was not discussing, for there is no discussion, wither the CVA should make neither apologies nor retractions. Instead I was pointing out that CVA need not concoct a cover of subterfuge when making its declarations but in doing so may not be permitted the stance of the righteous. Finally in closing to paraphrase an ancient seeker of truths and axioms. æThe pursuits of the theologist have not only not trained him to that acute scent, to that delicate, almost instinctive, tact which, in the twilight of probability, the search and discrimination of its finer facts demand; they have gone to cloud his vision, to indurate his touch, to all but the blazing light, the iron chain of demonstration, and left him out of the narrow confines of his science, to a passive credulity in any premises, or to an absolute incredulity in all.Æ
Garreck Amarr Border Defense Consortium Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.30 21:58:00 - [56] Originally by: ER0X You are no closer to the truth now than you were when I began this,.,., investigation, in fact we could call it, lets say ,.,., an interview. I'm no closer to the truth than when you started this investigation? Case closed on who's bending words, I suppose. Originally by: ER0X On that note common sense would dictate from the perspective of the observer, the observer being the Alliance forces whoever they may be. That should they meet CVA in the field they should expect to be targeted by CVA and considered hostile. In this case it would be prudent to consider the forces of CVA duplicitous and hostile at all times. I was not discussing, for there is no discussion, wither the CVA should make neither apologies nor retractions. Instead I was pointing out that CVA need not concoct a cover of subterfuge when making its declarations but in doing so may not be permitted the stance of the righteous. The CVA "hostile" list is extensive. Most organizations in both the Coallition and the Alliance are on it. If there's ever a question of whom we're hostile to, contact can be made with a CVA diplomat. CVA is not trying to "cover" our actions by any means. If anything, our declarations are just as much to let Coallition forces know that their status as targets in Providence has not changed as a result of our operation last weekend. Or, as has been hashed and re-hashed, CVA is not taking sides in this conflict. We were asked by an ally to assist, and we assisted. We've done so before. That our assistance is only percieved by the limited perspective of "Alliance vs Coallition" is not our problem. You are investigating a mystery that simply doesn't exist. So, once again, it is up to the Alliance to make good on their threats. Which, I might remind you, was the original topic of this discussion. Or are Mercenary Coallition trying to gracefully back the Alliance out of a threat that, while certainly achievable, would prove far too costly for far too little strategic gain?
Cadela Fria Amarr Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.08.31 09:20:00 - [57] Edited by: Cadela Fria on 31/08/2007 09:42:11 Originally by: Bastables Originally by: Cadela Fria Edited by: Cadela Fria on 30/08/2007 10:33:08 Truth is truth denied when lamented in words which opposes the acts commited by a man. Lest we forget that sin will come back to Ruin. Indeed it will come, but The Speaker of Truths - Who so counciled and dismembered Aritcio of Kor Azor, to appease it's people and God - was wrong. Ruin shall indeed not come as an uprising, but nor shall it come as a revolution, but as an evolution. An evolution, where all of the endings are waiting to begin. So shall it be, and so we begin. The filth no longer even try to hide their corruption behind avaraice. Pathetic. Filth? avarice? I am neither in need of a bath, nor am I greedy. Your constipated huffings are ill-mannered and poorly placed. However, despite your hostile approach of my person instead of my words, which has led me to believe even you can see I'm right - I will momentarily entertain your remark with a response: My purpose, as so set by God and her people, is to learn without moral or religious restraint - To that end I desire no harm to that which created me, nor do I desire to stray from my path. You, however, have made a decision to interfere in what I was created to do, and you have thus left me no choice on what I am about to do. What I will do, will be done without a moments pause or doubt. It will be done with precision, coldness and without sympathy. There is only one way through the course of the universe - Forward. You have made many a flamboyant speeches to say you are a participating entity without actually being it. To claim to be something and denying it at the same time is not only sinful and rhetorically unsound, it is also not what holds relevance ind the end either. What is relevant, is that the evolution of God and man, will not be halted by simple lies. EDITED: OOC for spelling Knowledge is a priviledge, not a right
Hardin Amarr Imperial Dreams Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.08.31 09:24:00 - [58] Originally by: ER0X I have scoured all of GAL-net for any overt meaningful proof to back up the claims laid by the governess and have completely drawn a blank. In addition I have also sent out memoranda to all my intelligence sources in an attempt to decipher any covert, coded or hidden agendas within internal and external broadcasts in search of proofs. I have found absolutely no indication that the Alliance had or has any interest within Providence or its residents. I am not going to give away our intelligence resources but in the week leading up to our decision to assist IAC we received a HUGE amount of information that CVA was now a target of the Alliance and on the point of being dragged into the war against our own will. To be more specific we had received a lot of information from MULTIPLE 'sources' in MC's new 'Northern' allies that they were planning on moving down to assist MC vs IAC and that CVA were also on their 'hit list'. Now, I will accept that it is possible that this may not have been an officially initiated or endorsed activity by either the leaderships of MC or BoB. Indeed it may even have been a case of miscommunication between the leadership of MC's new allies and their membership. Whatever the case, the fact remains that we received multiple warnings that 'Alliance' aligned forces were on the point of initiating aggressive action against us. In the face of this 'apparent' hostility and in view of our long standing links with IAC we decided to take action of our own. It is of course completely possibly that through such action we have managed to push ourselves further up your 'hit list' but we are Amarrians and we are perfectly prepared to live with those consequences. I do also want to repeat the clarification issued by my sister Siobhan. We have not joined the Coalition. The majority of our effort remains focused on securing Providence for the Amarr Empire but we shall assist our long term ally IAC as and when necessary. Many Coalition aligned alliances remain on our Kill On Sight list in Providence (due to their piracy in the region) and no doubt we remain on theirs should we venture into their territory... Originally by: ER0X Might I also point out that a by-product to the stance taken is also, being perceived as a non neutral involvement wither the CVA cares for it or not. As I pointed about above we are willing to accept the consequences of our actions. If the Alliance wishes to perceive the CVA as aligned against it then it can do so. Our understanding (through various sources) was that we were already viewed in that way by many in the Alliance. Originally by: ER0X If this is the case then it truly is a black day in Amarrian history and possibly the prelude to either the traversal along a darker path in much the same fashion as the covenanterÆs millennia ago or total annihilation. We are not laying claim to Querious (yet) - although our ultimate objective has and always will be to subdue the entire galaxy under our benevolent Amarrian leadership. At the end of the day IAC are an old friend. They are an alliance which was originally rooted in Amarrian space and shared many common roots and friendships with CVA. It really would not be very Amarrian to abandon a friend in its hour of need! While this move may ultimately lead to our doom at the hands of heretic Alliance forces (which is yet to be seen) I hardly think it warrants the statement that "it is a black day in Amarrian history". ------------------------------ CVA - Kicking Arse For The Empire - http://eve-files.com/dl/83607
Murukan Minmatar Infortunatus Eventus Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.08.31 14:00:00 - [59] That would be a scary threat if Storm Enterprises didn't pack up and run away from their space everytime more than 10 enemies show up. How was geminate or the north? Manlove by Zaphod Jones
ER0X Eternity INC. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.09.02 11:58:00 - [60] A mischievous glint sparkled in the eye of the inquisitor as he arose to address the new participant. A timely intervention on your part Hardin. I am overwhelmed by your generosity toward the inferior. The waif Garreck although spirited lacks guidance when addressing his betters, suffice to say he should be eternally grateful that you had the wherewithal to interject on his behalf before he intellectually found himself on the operating table prepped and awaiting dissection. Instead I shall yield to you the pleasure, see to it that he receives a healthy grounding. Carefully breaking the protection seals on a holoreel making sure not to damage the contents ER0X closely examines his work before continuing. It is understandable that you would not wish to reveal your sources; as such I shall press the matter no further. These revelations present an interesting turn of events. You may well be correct in your summation of garbled lines of communication. However I am far from convinced of this. The lobbies surrounding the MC war cabinet have not resounded with talk against CVA. Far from it, youÆre unveiling of such a plan came much to my surprise. CVA backing its neighbour IAC however was not such a surprise, more so the nature of the backing. Now! Ruling out loose talk amongst an overzealous allied force leaves another two possible solutions. Either the intelligence is good or it is disinformation. The holoreel balanced in one hand, ER0X with one eye closed weights and calculates the trajectory vector of the reel towards the projector in the corner of the room. Surely you must concede that there would be little perceivable strategic benefit in an attack against the CVA in Providence. I can also see little to be gained in such a development from a business perspective. His attention diverted back to the Amarr representative the mercenary affords himself a wry grin. IÆm sure you need not be reminded of the nature of my business. Though I will offer a little clarification for posterityÆs sake. There are two conditions either of which would have to be met for such an undertaking. The first being client based, to my knowledge no client has ever come forward with such a proposal. The second would be the result of either a direct or indirect attack by CVA forces on MC territory. The former would be in accordance to the objectives laid out by said client. The later would lead to very serious ramifications indeed. Further more your claims of a æHeretic AllianceÆ are a little, lets say misguided. In my dealings with them I have discovered them to be shades of grey rather than the black and white depiction youÆve presented. The Alliance forces in the west and south west have long acted as a protectorate; have policed the buffer zone between both the Blood raiders and the Sanshas territories. It could even be argued they have halted their progress by attacking the complexes, so much so that they themselves have torn down their static complexes in favour of a more mobile alternative. I have often been witness in my travels to many a GBC sortie deep in both regions, of that controlled space, dispatching countless squadrons and officers. Of course there may be some within the Alliance who have been found to be duplicitousà.. I digress. A quick flick of the wrist and the holoreel is sent whirring through the air. The trajectory vector precisely calculated. With this offensive movement of CVA forces into the Querious region, and with the understanding that it is not to be claimed æyetÆ, it would not be such a wild idiocy to assume of the Empire returning to a cooler more aggressive stance in the reclaiming. As such my statement æit is a black day in Amarrian historyÆ stands as is. Of course my contract inbox may well be bolstered as a result. The holoreel slams into its target, as the mercenary fully expected. The holo image flickers and springs into life. The scene unfolds as the camera zooms in through the star map. In the top left hand corner of the image emblazoned in green there is written one word,à Atioth. OOC: apologies for the delay in posting IÆve been a little busy the last two days, and also for any inconsistencies in naming conventions, these posts are my first tentative steps among the IC forums.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.