EVE Search - 1389 open for review

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

1389 open for review

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Hellmar	Posted - 2004.02.07 17:16:00 - [1] We have prepared patch 1389 which is a release candidate for an TQ upgrade on Monday. Please test it against Chaos and tell us what you think. Available at the Test Patch Page. The patch notes have not been finalized yet but Traveler keeps a good compilation here on patch review
DigitalCommunist	Posted - 2004.02.07 17:41:00 - [2] Conquerable Stations? Warp Field Disruptors? _____________________________________ Perpetually driven, your end is our beginning. "Can I be a consultant for EVE II?" - WhiteDwarf
Helison	Posted - 2004.02.07 17:48:00 - [3] Hellmar, are there any specialitys which has to be tested?
CT BadIronTree	Posted - 2004.02.07 17:53:00 - [4] we need some love :P put tech 2 ships in lotary :P ============================================ Colossus Technologies The first and oldest corp in eve! BadIronTree Head of Production CSM Chat Log September 25, 2003: Fuhry> Some things we simply cannot test, and therefore we just put it on Tranq. cross our fingers and then get into panic mode. --------------------------------------- playing (or beta testing)since Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:06 (beta 5) ---------------------------------------
Xailia	Posted - 2004.02.07 19:45:00 - [5] A few Intercepters have come out of the lottery already. "The sky above the port was the color of a television, tuned to a dead channel."
Sabahl	Posted - 2004.02.07 19:59:00 - [6] For the love of god, please leave the Damsel mission and Zor in the game. In case you missed it, here is the petition in the Missions forum with the rest of the playerbase saying the same thing.
Sara Kerrigan	Posted - 2004.02.07 21:33:00 - [7] Standings colored brackets still broken in 1389: the only one that works is player to player -5 gives yellow bracket. player to player +5 does not work, nor does player to corp +5 and -5, corp to player +5/-5, or corp to corp +5/-5. ______________ The Kerrigan Chronicles
Psychic Sue	Posted - 2004.02.07 22:17:00 - [8] does outlaw colouring work correctly now ? does one having such a red bracket actually has a sec-rating below -5.0 ?
Mr nStuff	Posted - 2004.02.07 22:38:00 - [9] A player shouldn't have a red bracket, unless your at war with them or they have such a nasty security status that your able to blast them anywhere in empire space. Everything else should be yellow or orange IMO. 5 R&D Agents, 10months, Zero BPO Offers.. Onboard navigational [Planetary Avoidance] computer. My account will be suspended at the end of the current play period. Expires on 19. September 2004
Darkcraft	Posted - 2004.02.08 00:16:00 - [10] so got to get these colours working, both in game and scanner related settings.
Halo Jones	Posted - 2004.02.08 00:52:00 - [11] I'm with theothers on the brackets here, change the colour alllocation, RED should signify danager and ability to fire, as in CORP WAR or OUTLAW. FYI, outlaw means sec lower than -5, unlike TQ currently autoscanner outlaw tab which means nothing of the sort. Corp Green should outrank Gnag BLue, so in empire space you are aware of which ships you are allowed to splash dmaage and which you are not without concord ganking you. Oberon Incorporated.
drunkenmaster	Posted - 2004.02.08 01:05:00 - [12] Quote: I'm with theothers on the brackets here, change the colour alllocation, RED should signify danager and ability to fire, as in CORP WAR or OUTLAW. FYI, outlaw means sec lower than -5, unlike TQ currently autoscanner outlaw tab which means nothing of the sort. Corp Green should outrank Gnag BLue, so in empire space you are aware of which ships you are allowed to splash damage and which you are not without concord ganking you. I agree with all this. Id rather gang outranked corp, and splash damage to gang did not cause concord to go ballistic. Too many people have lost too many ships over crappy splash damage to their friends. What would be nice is if concord popped up a box on the splashed users neocom, asking if they require concord assistance. But now I'm just dreaming... .
Toulak	Posted - 2004.02.08 01:50:00 - [13] Quote: What would be nice is if concord popped up a box on the splashed users neocom, asking if they require concord assistance. But now I'm just dreaming... That would be freakin awesome!
Skaz	Posted - 2004.02.08 03:19:00 - [14] Quote: Quote: I'm with theothers on the brackets here, change the colour alllocation, RED should signify danager and ability to fire, as in CORP WAR or OUTLAW. FYI, outlaw means sec lower than -5, unlike TQ currently autoscanner outlaw tab which means nothing of the sort. Corp Green should outrank Gnag BLue, so in empire space you are aware of which ships you are allowed to splash damage and which you are not without concord ganking you. I agree with all this. Id rather gang outranked corp, and splash damage to gang did not cause concord to go ballistic. Too many people have lost too many ships over crappy splash damage to their friends. What would be nice is if concord popped up a box on the splashed users neocom, asking if they require concord assistance. But now I'm just dreaming... Actually I think that drunken is on to something there about a popup box..... I wonder if that could be done...or if CCP is willing to try it. "No, I'm not alt.....even if I have been in Pator Tech School for 2 years..."
cashman	Posted - 2004.02.08 05:56:00 - [15] Edited by: cashman on 08/02/2004 05:57:26 Quote: For the love of god, please leave the Damsel mission and Zor in the game. In case you missed it, here is the petition in the Missions forum with the rest of the playerbase saying the same thing. I quote: Quote: The mission, Damsel in Distress, has had it's most difficult encounter removed. It was deemed too hard for a level 3 mission. ____________________________________ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Fto Cruise	Posted - 2004.02.08 11:27:00 - [16] A pop-up box would just obscure the view temporarily, cause a pause in the gameplay of that player who gets it and generally be a real pain in the ass! Best to wait till they FINALLY fix the bugs Manufacturers of the 425mm Railgun II
Stue	Posted - 2004.02.08 11:30:00 - [17] I hope they fixed the autoscanner sometimes not refreshing anymore until reboot.
Jim Raynor	Posted - 2004.02.08 12:02:00 - [18] Still no ship balance or missile changes? Argh. :\| ------ ROBBLE ROBBLE
Darkcraft	Posted - 2004.02.08 12:16:00 - [19] keep the green square for corp, and the blue square for gang. gang should have top priority over everything. if you want to have someone in ur corp show up as such when in gang, then change the corners of the blue squares to green. you can do the same for people you are at war with / have less than -5 security rating. although ganging them might not be a good idea. this way u can still see who is good and bad while still having the gang take priority. then everyones happy. oh and please add the conquerable stations in this patch, with any luck in tactical related systems and not just randomly in 0.0 space.
Rancid Mare	Posted - 2004.02.08 13:08:00 - [20] Edited by: Rancid Mare on 08/02/2004 13:09:23 can we keep zor in the game please. only like 100 peoples posting about it. Save Zor Rancid Mare of the EveMarshals. Our Webby Recruitement Videos here
Hakera	Posted - 2004.02.08 13:16:00 - [21] All we are saying...Give Zor a chance! Good to see autorepeat on missle launchers is back. Dumbledore - Eve-I.com
Helison	Posted - 2004.02.08 13:38:00 - [22] Edited by: Helison on 08/02/2004 13:44:14 A few issues with overtakeable stations in 1389: ) Docking cost per volume: Please allow lower costs than 0.1 ISK/m3 and don¦t allow to high costs. With 1000 ISK/m3 you would have to pay 10^9 ISK for docking, which would make a station unusable if the owner would leave the station. ) Please reset the docking fee and the docking restrictions when a station is overtaken. Otherwise it could be possible that nobody can dock to a station at all. Other approach: Exclude corpmembers of the owning corp from docking fees and docking restrictions. Further wishes: ) Send an evemail to directors, when the station is attacked. ) Make the market or escrow missions available for overtakeable stations. ) Option, that you can buy/build/repair a bigger armor for the station. ) Info-window where you can check the exact shield/armor of the station, which you are defending. Helison. PS: Stop whining about Zor
LeeL0o	Posted - 2004.02.08 14:16:00 - [23] Just btw, are there a Fix to mines? I noticed that they are still 5m¦ after the chnanges to last patch and there is no Launcher at all who can hold 5m¦ actually. Whould be nice to ballance the mines. I think they make to low dammage. at least 50-60 Points would be nice. And what are about the last missing Blueprints? Mining Drones lv I?, Cargo Expander Lv I. but i have to say.. nice Patch and it seems you dont have loose anytime. Thanks to CCP
Helison	Posted - 2004.02.08 15:04:00 - [24] @LeeL0o: Mines aren¦t fixed on Chaos till now. They are needing still 5m3! CCP, please fix this!
RobW1	Posted - 2004.02.08 15:06:00 - [25] How do CCP anticipate that we, as players, can set up the docking tax, so that our corp mates, or alliance mates pay no docking fee, or even VERY little, compared with non-alliance, or non corp? Is that possible atm? I mean it should be. Where does the docking tax go to? To the corp that took over the station?
cashman	Posted - 2004.02.08 17:53:00 - [26] Quote: Edited by: Rancid Mare on 08/02/2004 13:09:23 can we keep zor in the game please. only like 100 peoples posting about it. Save Zor [sarcasm]Wow! 1.7% actually want him to stay.[/sarcasm] ____________________________________ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
KIARiley	Posted - 2004.02.08 18:11:00 - [27] can a blue box be added to drones of fellow gang m8s to make it easy to identify them from possible enemy drones ?
j0sephine	Posted - 2004.02.08 18:16:00 - [28] "[sarcasm]Wow! 1.7% actually want him to stay.[/sarcasm]" ... Compared to number of people bothered enough to demand him go on the same forum, that's quite significant feedback.
Chai N'Dorr	Posted - 2004.02.08 18:18:00 - [29] Quote: \|cashman:\| [sarcasm]Wow! 1.7% actually want him to stay.[/sarcasm] Guess you don't know much about Forum statistics then...
LeeL0o	Posted - 2004.02.08 18:31:00 - [30] I guess they go to the place where also the Corptaxes go now. An non-used MySQL Database entry. I think it couldnt be bad if CCP take a eye on this.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.