| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Hellmar
   |
Posted - 2004.02.07 17:16:00 -
[1]
We have prepared patch 1389 which is a release candidate for an TQ upgrade on Monday. Please test it against Chaos and tell us what you think.
Available at the Test Patch Page.
The patch notes have not been finalized yet but Traveler keeps a good compilation here on patch review
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 17:41:00 -
[2]
Conquerable Stations?
Warp Field Disruptors?
_____________________________________
Perpetually driven, your end is our beginning.
"Can I be a consultant for EVE II?" - WhiteDwarf |
Helison
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 17:48:00 -
[3]
Hellmar, are there any specialitys which has to be tested?
|
CT BadIronTree
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 17:53:00 -
[4]
we need some love :P put tech 2 ships in lotary :P
============================================
Colossus Technologies
The first and oldest corp in eve!
BadIronTree Head of Production
CSM Chat Log September 25, 2003:
Fuhry> Some things we simply cannot test, and therefore we just put it on Tranq. cross our fingers and then get into panic mode.
---------------------------------------
playing (or beta testing)since Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:06 (beta 5)
---------------------------------------
|
Xailia
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 19:45:00 -
[5]
A few Intercepters have come out of the lottery already.
"The sky above the port was the color of a television, tuned to a dead channel." |
Sabahl
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 19:59:00 -
[6]
For the love of god, please leave the Damsel mission and Zor in the game.
In case you missed it, here is the petition in the Missions forum with the rest of the playerbase saying the same thing.
|
Sara Kerrigan
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 21:33:00 -
[7]
Standings colored brackets still broken in 1389: the only one that works is player to player -5 gives yellow bracket. player to player +5 does not work, nor does player to corp +5 and -5, corp to player +5/-5, or corp to corp +5/-5.
______________
The Kerrigan Chronicles |
Psychic Sue
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 22:17:00 -
[8]
does outlaw colouring work correctly now ? does one having such a red bracket actually has a sec-rating below -5.0 ?
|
Mr nStuff
|
Posted - 2004.02.07 22:38:00 -
[9]
A player shouldn't have a red bracket, unless your at war with them or they have such a nasty security status that your able to blast them anywhere in empire space.
Everything else should be yellow or orange IMO.
5 R&D Agents, 10months, Zero BPO Offers..
Onboard navigational [Planetary Avoidance] computer.
My account will be suspended at the end of the current play period.
Expires on 19. September 2004 |
Darkcraft
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 00:16:00 -
[10]
so got to get these colours working, both in game and scanner related settings.
|
Halo Jones
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 00:52:00 -
[11]
I'm with theothers on the brackets here, change the colour alllocation, RED should signify danager and ability to fire, as in CORP WAR or OUTLAW.
FYI, outlaw means sec lower than -5, unlike TQ currently autoscanner outlaw tab which means nothing of the sort.
Corp Green should outrank Gnag BLue, so in empire space you are aware of which ships you are allowed to splash dmaage and which you are not without concord ganking you.
Oberon Incorporated. |
drunkenmaster
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 01:05:00 -
[12]
 Quote:
I'm with theothers on the brackets here, change the colour alllocation, RED should signify danager and ability to fire, as in CORP WAR or OUTLAW.
FYI, outlaw means sec lower than -5, unlike TQ currently autoscanner outlaw tab which means nothing of the sort.
Corp Green should outrank Gnag BLue, so in empire space you are aware of which ships you are allowed to splash damage and which you are not without concord ganking you.
I agree with all this.
Id rather gang outranked corp, and splash damage to gang *did not* cause concord to go ballistic. Too many people have lost too many ships over crappy splash damage to their friends.
What would be nice is if concord popped up a box on the splashed users neocom, asking if they require concord assistance. But now I'm just dreaming...
.
|
Toulak
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 01:50:00 -
[13]
Quote:
What would be nice is if concord popped up a box on the splashed users neocom, asking if they require concord assistance. But now I'm just dreaming...
That would be freakin awesome!
|
Skaz
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 03:19:00 -
[14]
Quote:
Quote:
I'm with theothers on the brackets here, change the colour alllocation, RED should signify danager and ability to fire, as in CORP WAR or OUTLAW.
FYI, outlaw means sec lower than -5, unlike TQ currently autoscanner outlaw tab which means nothing of the sort.
Corp Green should outrank Gnag BLue, so in empire space you are aware of which ships you are allowed to splash damage and which you are not without concord ganking you.
I agree with all this.
Id rather gang outranked corp, and splash damage to gang *did not* cause concord to go ballistic. Too many people have lost too many ships over crappy splash damage to their friends.
What would be nice is if concord popped up a box on the splashed users neocom, asking if they require concord assistance. But now I'm just dreaming...
Actually I think that drunken is on to something there about a popup box.....
I wonder if that could be done...or if CCP is willing to try it.
"No, I'm not alt.....even if I have been in Pator Tech School for 2 years..." |
cashman
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 05:56:00 -
[15]
Edited by: cashman on 08/02/2004 05:57:26
Quote:
For the love of god, please leave the Damsel mission and Zor in the game.
In case you missed it, here is the petition in the Missions forum with the rest of the playerbase saying the same thing.
I quote:
Quote:
The mission, Damsel in Distress, has had it's most difficult encounter removed. It was deemed too hard for a level 3 mission.
____________________________________
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
|
Fto Cruise
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 11:27:00 -
[16]
A pop-up box would just obscure the view temporarily, cause a pause in the gameplay of that player who gets it and generally be a real pain in the ass!
Best to wait till they FINALLY fix the bugs
Manufacturers of the 425mm Railgun II |
Stue
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 11:30:00 -
[17]
I hope they fixed the autoscanner sometimes not refreshing anymore until reboot.
|
Jim Raynor
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 12:02:00 -
[18]
Still no ship balance or missile changes?
Argh. :|
------
ROBBLE ROBBLE |
Darkcraft
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 12:16:00 -
[19]
keep the green square for corp, and the blue square for gang. gang should have top priority over everything. if you want to have someone in ur corp show up as such when in gang, then change the corners of the blue squares to green. you can do the same for people you are at war with / have less than -5 security rating. although ganging them might not be a good idea. this way u can still see who is good and bad while still having the gang take priority. then everyones happy.
oh and please add the conquerable stations in this patch, with any luck in tactical related systems and not just randomly in 0.0 space.
|
Rancid Mare
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 13:08:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Rancid Mare on 08/02/2004 13:09:23
can we keep zor in the game please.
only like 100 peoples posting about it.
Save Zor
Rancid Mare of the EveMarshals.
Our Webby
Recruitement Videos here |
Hakera
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 13:16:00 -
[21]
All we are saying...Give Zor a chance!
Good to see autorepeat on missle launchers is back. 
Dumbledore - Eve-I.com |
Helison
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 13:38:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Helison on 08/02/2004 13:44:14
A few issues with overtakeable stations in 1389:
*) Docking cost per volume: Please allow lower costs than 0.1 ISK/m3 and don¦t allow to high costs. With 1000 ISK/m3 you would have to pay 10^9 ISK for docking, which would make a station unusable if the owner would leave the station.
*) Please reset the docking fee and the docking restrictions when a station is overtaken. Otherwise it could be possible that nobody can dock to a station at all.
Other approach: Exclude corpmembers of the owning corp from docking fees and docking restrictions.
Further wishes:
*) Send an evemail to directors, when the station is attacked.
*) Make the market or escrow missions available for overtakeable stations.
*) Option, that you can buy/build/repair a bigger armor for the station.
*) Info-window where you can check the exact shield/armor of the station, which you are defending.
Helison.
PS: Stop whining about Zor
|
LeeL0o
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 14:16:00 -
[23]
Just btw, are there a Fix to mines?
I noticed that they are still 5m¦ after the chnanges to last patch and there is no Launcher at all who can hold 5m¦ actually.
Whould be nice to ballance the mines. I think they make to low dammage. at least 50-60 Points would be nice.
And what are about the last missing Blueprints?
Mining Drones lv I?, Cargo Expander Lv I.
but i have to say.. nice Patch and it seems you dont have loose anytime.
Thanks to CCP
|
Helison
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 15:04:00 -
[24]
@LeeL0o: Mines aren¦t fixed on Chaos till now. They are needing still 5m3!
CCP, please fix this!
|
RobW1
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 15:06:00 -
[25]
How do CCP anticipate that we, as players, can set up the docking tax, so that our corp mates, or alliance mates pay no docking fee, or even VERY little, compared with non-alliance, or non corp? Is that possible atm? I mean it should be.
Where does the docking tax go to? To the corp that took over the station?
|
cashman
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 17:53:00 -
[26]
Quote:
Edited by: Rancid Mare on 08/02/2004 13:09:23
can we keep zor in the game please.
only like 100 peoples posting about it.
Save Zor
[sarcasm]Wow! 1.7% actually want him to stay.[/sarcasm]
____________________________________
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
|
KIARiley
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 18:11:00 -
[27]
can a blue box be added to drones of fellow gang m8s to make it easy to identify them from possible enemy drones ?
|
j0sephine
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 18:16:00 -
[28]
"[sarcasm]Wow! 1.7% actually want him to stay.[/sarcasm]"
... Compared to number of people bothered enough to demand him go on the same forum, that's quite significant feedback.
|
Chai N'Dorr
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 18:18:00 -
[29]
Quote:
|cashman:|
[sarcasm]Wow! 1.7% actually want him to stay.[/sarcasm]
Guess you don't know much about Forum statistics then...
|
LeeL0o
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 18:31:00 -
[30]
I guess they go to the place where also the Corptaxes go now. An non-used MySQL Database entry.
I think it couldnt be bad if CCP take a eye on this.
|
RobW1
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 18:51:00 -
[31]
Two further issues I've just encountered...
1. Kill an NPC, and you get a cargo can. If it is multiple items, and you highlight them all, and drag them to your cargo hold - only one items moves
2. Sometimes the conversation window seems to scroll right back up to the top, not downwards.
|
Helison
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 19:33:00 -
[32]
Quote:
How do CCP anticipate that we, as players, can set up the docking tax, so that our corp mates, or alliance mates pay no docking fee, or even VERY little, compared with non-alliance, or non corp? Is that possible atm? I mean it should be.
You can adjust the amount, which someone has to pay, by the standing to someone.
Quote:
Where does the docking tax go to? To the corp that took over the station?
Yes
|
dalman
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 19:35:00 -
[33]
Quote:
1389
BugFix for ResignFromCEO and multiple PerformSessionChange calls. (TQ)
Does this mean that gang-invite while jumping/docking now works?
In that case, w00t!!!
M.I.A. since 2004-07-30 |
Leno
|
Posted - 2004.02.08 21:38:00 -
[34]
sorry any chance someone can say what all is being added or at least where i can find full info, thanks.
---------------
RIP - Smoske, My Friend
|
Thomas Epsilon
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 06:17:00 -
[35]
Quote:
sorry any chance someone can say what all is being added or at least where i can find full info, thanks.
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=23069
|
Sabahl
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 07:47:00 -
[36]
Quote:
Quote:
|cashman:|
[sarcasm]Wow! 1.7% actually want him to stay.[/sarcasm]
Guess you don't know much about Forum statistics then...
And also, if you're going to argue about small percentages of people posting regarding content in the game, why are we even bothering to discuss stuff on this thread in the first place?
|
ElricUK
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 15:07:00 -
[37]
With regards to the 'Do you require assistance' idea posted earlier. Why not when you are attacked, have a descrete button (red?) appear somewhere with the offenders name close to it, indicateing that concord are on their way to deal with said person on your behalf. Then you could click on that button to 'cancel' their assitance?
|
LeeL0o
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 16:29:00 -
[38]
We need a Vote option on the Login screen.
With a Link where you can Comment like now in the Dev Blog.
So have all players the possebility to vote.
|
Grey Area
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 17:19:00 -
[39]
Edited by: Grey Area on 09/02/2004 17:21:23
Quote:
A pop-up box would just obscure the view temporarily, cause a pause in the gameplay of that player who gets it and generally be a real pain in the ass!
Best to wait till they FINALLY fix the bugs
Yes you're right, it would. There's another option - a button, like the buttons that are now in for scanner, drones, cargo and autopilot. It only works if you've taken damage in the last 60 seconds, and if you press it, Concord turn up. They don't turn up if you're at war with the source of the damage. How hard can it be?
If we do want to complicate things slightly, it could flash when it's available to be used.
=========================================
* I'm ALLOWED to cheat. I'm a STARSHIP. *
========================================= |
F4ze
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 17:31:00 -
[40]
I am now having problems with chat window scrollbars not going down. Never had that before.
|
Multilok
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 18:17:00 -
[41]
Quote:
1384
No real entries
WTF ?!?
|
Zzyxx
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 20:08:00 -
[42]
We want Zor!
---------------------------
The silverpilot in a Muninn |
Belgarath
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 21:02:00 -
[43]
Bug no 1 : cant load Giant (in space) from ship-cargo, not single items, not "all" Items.
load from Giant (in space) into ship-cargo no problem.
Bug no 2: change ships in space: new ship has standard-attributes (cpu & Powergrid), no fitted item, no skill is working.
This bug is ingame from build 964 to build 1389.
Think, its time to fix it.
thank you
Belgarath, the lonesome wolf
|
Jadrut
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 21:41:00 -
[44]
the pirate spawns in 0.4 and below are now too pussified i would like, if possible for the 1378 respawns to return plz
|
Jadrut
|
Posted - 2004.02.09 22:17:00 -
[45]
uhh cancel that
|
Astraios
|
Posted - 2004.02.10 07:47:00 -
[46]
Still cant remove bookmarks from people an places, there permanently there since the patch before this most recent one. :(
Also I still get blanks spots when I type to friend in chat rooms. Like the space the text takes up shows up but its totally blank. It usually takes 2-3 messages to make them appear.
I feel the smartest thing you guys did was add the right click anywhere and toggle all things in that system, genius.
|
Sirilonwe
|
Posted - 2004.02.10 08:51:00 -
[47]
for the bookmark, i've found a workaround: simply left click before on the bookmark to highlight it, and then right click and remove it.
_______________________
DSU Recrute!
Corporation PVP FR, nous formons les nouveaux joueurs. Travail salariÚ. Contactez moi ingame.
Forums DSU |
Chrome Tsunami
|
Posted - 2004.02.10 13:36:00 -
[48]
Edited by: Chrome Tsunami on 10/02/2004 13:37:23
There's a better workaround for the bookmarks. Make a folder - drag all the bookmarks you wanna delete into it, then delete the folder. Works like a dream.
|
DarKRealm
|
Posted - 2004.02.10 15:54:00 -
[49]
Quote:
A player shouldn't have a red bracket, unless your at war with them or they have such a nasty security status that your able to blast them anywhere in empire space.
Everything else should be yellow or orange IMO.
hmm.. this should work? i changed all settings but all colors are red :(
|
Bretti
|
Posted - 2004.02.11 11:32:00 -
[50]
I'm getting problems with chat, too.
When the text hits the bottom of the window from a clean sheet (just after logon), the scrollbar will form, but will be locked to the top of the window instead of the bottom, meaning that no more chat comes up after I've had a full window of it.
I can manually scroll down to get it started, but it's a bother.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |